Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Maverick Inventor Versus Corporate Inventor

Defense Intelligence Agency · 19 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated 30 March 2010 and produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program, compares lone maverick inventors with corporate inventors working in large organizations. It focuses on unconventional energy and propulsion, including free energy and antigravity claims. It sorts inventors into five types. It concludes that trained maverick inventors (Types 3 and 4) are the most likely source of the next innovations, and that untrained inventors deserve only casual watching.

  • p. 2 …a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Defense Intelligence Agency, l…
  • p. 4 …Where Will the Next Major Innovations Arise? Introduction Technological innovation has been advanced by several sectors…
  • p. 8 …Perhaps the most famous and effective think tank was the vast agency known as the Manhattan…
  • p. 13 …Some of the more advanced Type 2 inventors realize they need to start with a more…
  • p. 16 …the inventor type most likely to produce the necessary innovations in the areas of advanced primary…
  • p. 17 …the "pedantic prudes" who consider that the process is already at the end-point of advancements…
  • p. 19 …32 Millis, M.G., "The NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Project: Methods of Advanced Research,N AIAA Professional…
UNCLASSIFIED/ fffHl 8PPitltllt tJ31! '51CE I
Table 1. Types and Examples of Think Tanks
Tvne Examoles
Universities Radlab, MIT, Cambridae, MA
Government Sandia National Laboratories,
Albuquerque, NM
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
Livermore, CA
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
NY
NASA (for example, Glenn Research
Center Brook Park OH)
Quasi-Government/Military DARPA, Arlinqton, VA
Corporate GM Research Laboratory, Warren, MI
Alcatel/Lucent - Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ
Skunk Works, Palmdale, CA
Privately Funded Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics,
Waterloo, Canada
Institute for Advanced Studies, Austin, TX
SARA (Scientific Applications & Research
Associates), Cvnress, CA
Independent, Nonprofit Battelle, Columbus, OH
SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute),
Palo Alto, CA
Austrian Research Centers, Seibersdorf,
Austria
These entities typically arose in response to a particular need or crisis. Perhaps the
most famous and effective think tank was the vast agency known as the Manhattan
District. Less well known to the public was, for example, the RadLab at MIT.
Except in the case of privately funded organizations, they all support many hundreds to
thousands of researchers, of which a variable proportion could be termed "inventors."
Even the smaller entities support a dozen or so highly motivated scientists and
engineers easily classified as inventors.
A benefit of being an inventor in a large organization is access to information. The
corporate inventor can quickly determine whether a certain avenue of approach has
3
UNCLASSIFIED/ ,'FQII. QFFlliil,tik I lili O_,k¥

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 19 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.