Documents / Report
This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated 12 January 2010, is one of a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) program. It reviews materials for launch vehicles, space vehicles and reusable rocket engines, including aluminum alloys, polymer and metal matrix composites, titanium and nickel alloys, ceramics and titanium aluminides. It concludes that newer materials and design methods offer many ways to improve structural efficiency and cost compared with the space shuttle.
UNCLASSIFIED/;fFOR OFFISIIL Uill Otlla¥ not technology dependent but are cost intensive, no matter what technology is employed to meet the requirements. An additional characteristic of PMC structures-one related to the laminated construction of components made by hand layup or automated tow placement methods-is their susceptibility to fonnation of delaminations when impacted perpendicular to the plane of the plies. Thfs is due to the mismatch in bending stiffness between adjacent plies that have different unidirectional fiber orientations. This mismatch causes shear stresses to develop that can exceed the shear strength of the interlaminate bonds, causing small, embedded cracks to form. Under subsequent in plane compression loading, the laminates bow because of the Poisson stresses and separate because of the lack of an interlaminar bond to hold them together. In significant compression loads, the laminates buckle, and this leads to structural failure. This phenomenon, called compression after impact, is an insidious failure mode because the delaminations are not externally detectable unless ultrasonic inspection methods are used. Sources of such an impact include dropped tools, foreign objects (for example, meteorites), and, perhaps most commonly, hail storms. Ultrasonic inspection, if required, is expensive and time consuming. The latter concern in tum affects vehicle availability and turnaround time. PMC parts made using RTM typically have reinforcing fibers in the through-thickness direction, so concerns about compression after impact are minimal. The maximum temperature at which PMCs can be used is limited by PMCs' susceptibility to oxygen degradation of the polymeric matrix. The maximum-use temperature for prolonged exposure is determined by the thermal oxidative stabrlity (TOS) of a particular resin. The TOS, like any chemical reaction, is determined by both time and temperature. The glass transition temperature (T9) of the polymeric matrix also imposes strength and dimensional stability limitations independent of the TOS limits. This is particularly true for thermoplastics. However, the TOS limits usually impose lower temperature limits than T9 if prolonged thennal exposure is contemplated. Three distinct classes or groups of resins exist, each with a successively higher temperature capability. These are conventional epoxies and most thermal plastics, bismaleimides (BMis), and linear polyimides. The first class is limited by TOS to about 125° Celsius. BMis can be used to about 175° Celsius. Linear polyimides, such as the in situ polymerization of monomer reactants (PMR) group of thermosetting formulations, can be used to about 300° Celsius. Many of the PMR resins contain the hazardous compound methylenedianiline, which requires special care during use, including protective clothing to limit personnel exposure (for example, during ply cutting and hand layup). This requirement reduces productivity, adds cost, and creates a degree of liability concern for the manufacturer of the PMC components. For RTM, the BMis and PMR resins typically have higher viscosity and require commensurately higher injection temperatures to reduce the viscosity to manageable levels for reasons discussed earlier. New resins are constantly b.eing developed, including some with attractive properties. However, many of the sources of these resins are startup companies that exist on R&D funding, often in the form of LJ.S. government SBIR (Small Business Innovative Research) projects. Such companies are good at innovation but often have limited experience transitioning new products from the laboratory to large-scale production. Furthermore, in the current economic climate, access to sufficient capital to set up production-scale capacity can be a formidable problem for a small company. Larger companies (for example, BASF, DuPont, GE Plastics) typically are not interested 6 UNCLASSIFIED 1 <FOR OFFICl0L !155 ODIi ¥J I
Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 27 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.