Defense Intelligence Reference Document Anomalous And Subacute Field Effects On Human Biological Tissues

UNCLASSIFIED//5O9 OFFICIO k WEE 'iPlb¥
prestigious organization known to be interested in field effects. The authors consider
the case when the charge carriers are ions in a fluid flowing through a tube. The ions
are free to move but obviously confined within a specific volume. The team then poses
the question: what happens when you apply a static magnetic field modulated by
Johnson Noise (a function of calcium currents in closed tubes, non-linearly dependent
on temperature in the presence of ULF).
The answer, they say, is a resonance effect in which the ionic currents grow stronger.
The strength of the resonance depends on the size of the capillary and the strength of
the field. The authors have worked out how this effect might play out in the human
body, and cause stasis under certain conditions and small vessel damage, as a function
of the concentration of calcium in the microcirculation. A recent peer-review (well
beyond the capabilities of this author) has found the work promising [31].
C. SOME THOUGHTS ON NEUROLOGICAL CORRELATES
From this brief summary it can be seen that not only are incident energies,
wavelengths, and durations of exposures independent variables of gross injury, but
they also are variables as to tissue type. This might be expected, because the injury to
nerve and other cell types must be secondary to alteration of the molecular and
biochemical structures. In the case of nerves/neurons in peripheral or central nervous
system components, the action potentials and subsequent release of end-plate,
ephaphtic, or synaptic neurotransmitters are known to be related to the currents
induced across the membranes by direct EMF, or induced B-Fields.
The electrophysiology should allow inferences to be made as to incident energies and
bandwidths to the extent we can infer or discover the near-field RF qualitative and
quantitative measures. What can not be overly emphasized, is that when one looks at
the literature of anomalous cases, including claims from the most reliable sources, the
extent and degree of injuries are consistent across patients who are injured, compared
to witnesses in the far-field, who are not.
For example, in the cases this reviewer has studied, the directionality and the times of
the known RF/ EM exposures and the injury severity and patterns are highly
consistent: There are no significant differences in either the reported acute effects
(symptoms) or the physician-observed (signs) between the case of three antenna
engineers and the Cash-Landrum cases.
This pathophysiological observation is a convincing one: "Something" is causing these
near fieldx1 injuries, the energy deposition and conditions follow our "real-world"
neurological experience. It seems highly unlikely that imagination or delusion of
laypersons could mimic the science of thermal injury patterns, electrophysiology,
immunology, and neurology in a non-linear dose-response manner ... and incorporate the
biophysics of wavelength and eV effects (1 eV = 1.6 x 10· 19 joules).
""Near-Field" as a term in this and companion studies refers to the subjective distance, in part. between the
injured patient and the presumptive energy source, be it an RF/ EM antenna, source of microwaves, or
unidentified object. We use the term also to imply relatively limited spatio-temporal exposures (within 10s of
meters), times before acute (minutes to hours to one day) or subacute (up to 72 hours) periods between exposure
and signs and symptoms of actual injury. An object, or in this case a human body in the near field where
electromagnetic waves are incident yet to be fully formed due to the perturbation. But to first and second orders,
inferences and calculations of wavelength and energy depositions can sometimes be made with good reporting and
data from the events.
12
UNCLASSIFIED/, FOR OFFICIAL USE one,