Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document An Introduction To The Statistical Drake Equation

Defense Intelligence Agency · 55 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Agency reference document, dated 11 March 2010, is one of the advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) program. It introduces the Statistical Drake Equation, which replaces each factor of Frank Drake's 1961 equation with a uniform random variable to estimate how far away the nearest extraterrestrial civilization is. In the worked example, there is a 75% probability that the nearest civilization lies between 1,361 and 3,979 light years from Earth.

UNCLASSIFIED/ /f81il 8ffll1Als WliEii SUllslf
that the mean value of the lognormal random variable N is actually of the same order as the classical N given
by the ordinary Drake equation, as one might expect from a good statistical generalization.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Drake equation is a now famous result
(see ref. [ l] for the Wikipedia summary) in the
fields of SETI (the Search for ExtraTerrestial
Intelligence, see ref. [2J) and A~trohiology (~ee ref.
[3J). Devised in 1960, the Drake equation was the
fiN \Cientific attempt to estimate the number N of
ExtraTerrestrial civilizatiom in the Galaxy with
which we might come in contact. Frank D. Drake
(see ref. [41) proposed it as the product of seven
factors:
N = N.1·· /j! -ne· .fl ·.Ii· _fi-· fl.. (I)
Where:
I) N1· i~ the estimated number of stars in our
Galaxy.
2) fp is the fraction (= percentage) of such stars
that have planets.
3) ne is the number "Earth-type'' such planets
around the given star: in other words, ne is
number of planets, in a given stellar system,
on which the chemical condition~ exist for life
to begin its course: they arc ''ready for life,"
4) .fl is fraction (- pcn:cntagc) of such "ready for
life" planets on which lite actually starts and
grows up (but not yet to the "intelligence"
level).
5) .fi i~ the fraction (= percentage) of such
''planets with life fonns" that actually evolve
until some form of "intelligent civilization''
emerges (like the firsL historic human
civilizations on Earth).
6) .fc is the fraction (= percentage) of such
"planets ,vith civilizations" ,vhere the
civilizations evolve to the point of being able
to communicate acrms the interstellar
distances with other (al leas!) similarly
evolved civilizations. As far as we know in
2008, this meam that they must be aware of
the Maxwell equation~ governing radio waves,
as well as of computers and radioa\tronomy
(at lea~t).
7) .fL is the fraction of galactic civiliza!iom alive
at the time when we, poor humans, attempt to
pick up their radio signals (that they throw out
into space just as we have done since 1900,
,vhen Marconi started the transatlantic
trammis~ions). In other words. ft is the
29
number of civilizations nmv transmitting and
receiving, and this implies an estimate of·'how
long will a tedmological civilization live?"
!ha! nobody can make at the moment. Also.
are they going to destroy themselves in a
nuclear war, and thus live only a few decade~
of technological civilization? Or are they
~lowly becoming wiser, reject war, speak a
~ingle language (like English today). and
merge into a single "nation'', thu~ living in
peace for ages? Or will robots take over one
day making "flesh animals" disappear forever
(the so-called '·post-biological universe")?
No one knows ..
But let us go back to the Drake equation ( I).
In the fifty years of its existence, a number of
suggestions have been put forward about the
different numeric values of its seven factors. Of
course, every different set of these seven input
numbers yields a different value for N and we can
endlessly play that way. Bui we claim that these
are like ... children plays!
We claim the classical Drake equation (I), as
we ~hall call it from now on to di~tinguish it from
our statistical Drake equation to he introduced in
the coming sections, well, the classical Drake
equation is scientifically inadequate in one regard
at least: it just handles sheer numbers and does not
associate an error bar to each of its seven factors.
At the very least, we want to associate an error
bar to each D;.
Well, we have thus reached STEP ONE in our
improvement of the classical Drake equation:
replace each sheer number by a probability
di.~tribation!
The reader is now asked to look al the Bow
chart in the next page as a guide lo this paper,
please.
2. STEP I, LETTING EACH FACTOR
BECOME A RANDOM VARIABLE
In this paper we adopt the notations of the
great book "Probability, Random Variables and
Stochastic Processes" by Athanasios Papoulis
( 1921-2002), now re-published as Papoulis-Pillai,
UNCLASSIFIED/ ;rett err1e1,rc USE OHEI

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 55 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.