Documents / Report
This Defense Intelligence Agency reference document, dated 11 March 2010, is one of the advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) program. It introduces the Statistical Drake Equation, which replaces each factor of Frank Drake's 1961 equation with a uniform random variable to estimate how far away the nearest extraterrestrial civilization is. In the worked example, there is a 75% probability that the nearest civilization lies between 1,361 and 3,979 light years from Earth.
UNCLASSIFIED/ /f81il 8ffll1Als WliEii SUllslf that the mean value of the lognormal random variable N is actually of the same order as the classical N given by the ordinary Drake equation, as one might expect from a good statistical generalization. I. INTRODUCTION The Drake equation is a now famous result (see ref. [ l] for the Wikipedia summary) in the fields of SETI (the Search for ExtraTerrestial Intelligence, see ref. [2J) and A~trohiology (~ee ref. [3J). Devised in 1960, the Drake equation was the fiN \Cientific attempt to estimate the number N of ExtraTerrestrial civilizatiom in the Galaxy with which we might come in contact. Frank D. Drake (see ref. [41) proposed it as the product of seven factors: N = N.1·· /j! -ne· .fl ·.Ii· _fi-· fl.. (I) Where: I) N1· i~ the estimated number of stars in our Galaxy. 2) fp is the fraction (= percentage) of such stars that have planets. 3) ne is the number "Earth-type'' such planets around the given star: in other words, ne is number of planets, in a given stellar system, on which the chemical condition~ exist for life to begin its course: they arc ''ready for life," 4) .fl is fraction (- pcn:cntagc) of such "ready for life" planets on which lite actually starts and grows up (but not yet to the "intelligence" level). 5) .fi i~ the fraction (= percentage) of such ''planets with life fonns" that actually evolve until some form of "intelligent civilization'' emerges (like the firsL historic human civilizations on Earth). 6) .fc is the fraction (= percentage) of such "planets ,vith civilizations" ,vhere the civilizations evolve to the point of being able to communicate acrms the interstellar distances with other (al leas!) similarly evolved civilizations. As far as we know in 2008, this meam that they must be aware of the Maxwell equation~ governing radio waves, as well as of computers and radioa\tronomy (at lea~t). 7) .fL is the fraction of galactic civiliza!iom alive at the time when we, poor humans, attempt to pick up their radio signals (that they throw out into space just as we have done since 1900, ,vhen Marconi started the transatlantic trammis~ions). In other words. ft is the 29 number of civilizations nmv transmitting and receiving, and this implies an estimate of·'how long will a tedmological civilization live?" !ha! nobody can make at the moment. Also. are they going to destroy themselves in a nuclear war, and thus live only a few decade~ of technological civilization? Or are they ~lowly becoming wiser, reject war, speak a ~ingle language (like English today). and merge into a single "nation'', thu~ living in peace for ages? Or will robots take over one day making "flesh animals" disappear forever (the so-called '·post-biological universe")? No one knows .. But let us go back to the Drake equation ( I). In the fifty years of its existence, a number of suggestions have been put forward about the different numeric values of its seven factors. Of course, every different set of these seven input numbers yields a different value for N and we can endlessly play that way. Bui we claim that these are like ... children plays! We claim the classical Drake equation (I), as we ~hall call it from now on to di~tinguish it from our statistical Drake equation to he introduced in the coming sections, well, the classical Drake equation is scientifically inadequate in one regard at least: it just handles sheer numbers and does not associate an error bar to each of its seven factors. At the very least, we want to associate an error bar to each D;. Well, we have thus reached STEP ONE in our improvement of the classical Drake equation: replace each sheer number by a probability di.~tribation! The reader is now asked to look al the Bow chart in the next page as a guide lo this paper, please. 2. STEP I, LETTING EACH FACTOR BECOME A RANDOM VARIABLE In this paper we adopt the notations of the great book "Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes" by Athanasios Papoulis ( 1921-2002), now re-published as Papoulis-Pillai, UNCLASSIFIED/ ;rett err1e1,rc USE OHEI
Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 55 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.