Documents / Report
This Defense Intelligence Agency reference document, dated 11 March 2010, is one of the advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) program. It introduces the Statistical Drake Equation, which replaces each factor of Frank Drake's 1961 equation with a uniform random variable to estimate how far away the nearest extraterrestrial civilization is. In the worked example, there is a 75% probability that the nearest civilization lies between 1,361 and 3,979 light years from Earth.
UNCLASSIFIED//FQA: QFFI&l11J.k W&liii Q•lklf ILY : ,, hm:ted to J. l1J.li l:.:ae ,:p,:_, , - ,) -f::i1 _y , :}1 and the fu ,,t moment c:' _\ 1~ ftxe-d at :; fae:1 the u1.1Xl.llu:.m. eu:iopy -:--::cm,, \,;lien p:x: 1 ' .1- -t' ' Now, we wish to point out that there is a third possible case, other than the two given by Shannon. This is the case when the probability density function p(x) is limited to a FINITE INTERVAL as x s b. This is obviously the case with any physical POSITIVE random variable, such as a distance, or the number N of extraterrestrial communicating civilizations in the ,". And it is easy to prove that for any such finite random variable the maximum entropy distribution is the UNIFORM distribution over as x sh. Shannon did not bother to prove this simple theorem in his 1948 papers since he probably regarded it as too trivial. But we prefer to point out this theorem since, in the language of the statistical Drake equation, it sounds like: "Since we don't know what the probability distribution of any one of the Drake random variables D, is, it is safer to assume that each of them has the maximum possible entropy over a, sxsb,, i.e., that D, is UNIFORMLY distributed there. The proof of this theorem is along the same lines as for the previous two cases discussed by Shannon: We start by assuming that a; SxSb,. We then form the linear combination of the entropy integral plus the normalization condition for D; where A is a Lagrange multiplier. Performing the variation, one finds -logp(x)-1 +/4 =0 that is: p(x)= ,,; 1 _ Applying the normalization condition (constraint) to the last expression for p(x) yields J,, ( ) JI>, )-1 )-IJI>, )-1( )l= px dx= e· dx=e· d.1.·=e· h,-a, "' "' "' that yields b, -(1 1 26 UNCLASSIFIED//COP OFFICIO I 1155 Q•lk¥
Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 55 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.