Documents / Report
This Defense Intelligence Agency reference document, dated 11 March 2010, is one of the advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) program. It introduces the Statistical Drake Equation, which replaces each factor of Frank Drake's 1961 equation with a uniform random variable to estimate how far away the nearest extraterrestrial civilization is. In the worked example, there is a 75% probability that the nearest civilization lies between 1,361 and 3,979 light years from Earth.
UNCLASSIFIED/;CFQA: QFFl&lallk 1!181! 8Hk¥ Having so done, the next question is: How can we find out the PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION for each D,? For instance, shall that be a Gaussian, or what? This is a difficult question, for nobody knows, for instance, the probability distribution of the number of stars in the galaxy, not to mention the probability distribution of the other six variables in the Drake equation (7). There is a brilliant way to get around this difficulty, though. We start by excluding the Gaussian because each variable in the Drake equation is a POSITIVE (or, more precisely, a non-negative) random variable, while the Gaussian applies to REAL random variables only. So, the Gaussian is out. Then, one might consider the large class of well-studied and positive probability densities called "the gamma distributions," but it is then unclear why one should adopt the gamma distributions and not any other. The solution to this apparent conundrum comes from Shannon's Information Theory and a theorem that he proved in 1948: "The probability distribution having maximum entropy(= uncertainty) over any FINITE range of real values is the UNIFORM distribution over that range," This is proven in Appendix A of the present document. So, at this point, we assume that each of the seven D1 in (7) is a UNIFORM random variable, whose mean value and standard deviation is known by the scientists working in the respective field (let it be astronomy, or biology, or sociology). Notice that, for such a uniform distribution, the knowledge of the mean value 1-'n. and of the standard deviation rr/), automatically determines the RANGE of that random variable in between its lower (called a,) and upper (called h;) limits: in fact these limits are given by the equations (the "surprising" factor .Ji in the above equations comes from the definitions of mean value and standard deviation: please see equations (12), (15) and (17) in Appendix B for the relevant proof). So the uniform distribution of each random variable D, is perfectly determined by its mean value and standard deviation, and so are all its other properties. The next problem is the following: OK, since we now know everything about each uniformly distributed D,, what is the probability distribution of N , given that N is the product (7) of all the D,? In other words, not only do we want to find the analytical expression of the probability density function of N, but we also want to relate its mean value flN to all mean values Jin, of the D,, and its standard deviation rrN to all standard deviations rrn, of the D, . 12 UNCLASSIFIED/ /f81il 8fFl&l1l1k I :iii ADIi X (8)
Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 55 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.