Documents / Document

Condign volumes 1 to 3

Internet Archive · 258 pages · text by GLM-OCR

This is Volume 2 of the Ministry of Defence report 'Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region', Defence Intelligence Staff Scientific and Technical Memorandum 55/2/00, dated February 2000 and received 7 December 2000. It gathers 25 working papers on natural and man-made phenomena, meant as a reference for analysing UAP reports. The papers cover ball lightning, radar detection, balloons, satellites, mirages, plasma and similar subjects. One paper compares magnetic field experiments on human volunteers with close encounter reports. It concludes that effects from such fields are 'uncannily similar' to what witnesses describe.

Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.

# UNCLASSIFIED SECRET UK RESTRICTED

## DETECTION OF UAPs BY RADAR

## 5.26

1. X X X X X

(a) The target must be radar-reflective. (See Appendix A5)

(b) A minimum detectable signal must return to the radar receiver to satisfy the radar receiver - S/N requirements (i.e. minimum detectable signal).

(c) The signal must be displayed (i.e. in a modern system which uses preset thresholds the display/processing threshold must be adequate for the target being inspected).

For a target track to be formed (a), (b) and (c) must be repeated at the radar's inspection (i.e. update) rate. In modern systems supposed 'spurious' random responses are likely to be rejected/filtered and unless they fulfil 'plot' requirements, will never be declared from successive plots into 'tracks'. Hence, they will not be seen as targets.

2. There is a significant absence of radar plots/tracks on UAPs. It should be borne in mind that, statistically, it is inconceivable that all UAPs in the UKADGE are reported by direct (human) sightings). In fact, there must be many more UAPs unreported which are within radar coverage but not within human sightlines (e.g. due to cloud cover, reduction of observers in sparsely populated parts of the UK etc.). Why, therefore, are not at least even a reasonable proportion of these reported by military or civil radars, either at sea, over land or by aircraft radars?

3. Possible Explanations A number of explanations are possible. The conditions at

para 1 above are not being met for one or more reasons:

a. For some reason the radar reflectivities of these unidentified objects are extremely low.

b. Because they do not 'communicate' or appear where aircraft are expected they are ignored by the operators (or the automatic processing systems) as spurious/short-lived observations.

c. Those seen are taken to be caused by flocks of birds.

d. When moving fast they exceed the upper Doppler/Velocity capability of the system. This may be, firstly, beyond the Doppler measurement capability of the particular type of radar $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $ $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $

e. The target cannot be seen because there is no radar sightline (e.g. terrain screening/low altitude). This can only be the case on a limited number of occasions, subject to range.

f. $ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $

$ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $

$ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $

$ \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times \times $

g. The object absorbs RF energy at least at the usual wavelengths in use and hence is not detected.

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 258 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.