Documents / FOIA release

/specialCollection/BerlinWall/1961-Summer/1961-07-12c.pdf

Central Intelligence Agency · 163 pages · text by OCR

This Top Secret study by the Interdepartmental Coordinating Group on Germany and Berlin, dated July 12, 1961, and released by the Central Intelligence Agency, answers NSC Directive No. 58 of June 30, 1961. It sets out courses of action for the Berlin crisis but does not judge their merits. It covers imminent presidential decisions, a three-phase timetable running to January 1, military preparations and mobilization, covert action, economic sanctions, public information, negotiating positions and checkpoint procedures for East German personnel.

  • p. 92 …the above actions /designed to provide a capability for dealing with the Berlin problem in advance…
  • p. 96 …the above actions designed to provide a capability for dealing with the Berlin problem in advance…
  • p. 98 …The Berlin preparedness measures and public reaction thereto might engender hoarding, scare buying, advance stocking, speculative…
  • p. 99 …the change is due to the conjunction of high levels of economic activity in other advanced…
  • p. 100 …However, it is only prudent to plan in advance to deal with the unfavorable contingencies described…
  • p. 130 …the change is due to the conjunction of high levels of economic activity in other advanced…
  • p. 145 …The Soviets justify their demand for the conclusion of separate peace treaties with the "two German…
## ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AND THEIR POSSIBLE PHASES OF APPLICATION

Mature of Allied Harassment, Countermeasures or other Action	Countries Taking Action	PHASE III (cont'd)
US Action Agencies	General Comment
11. d. Institute total trade embargo. Cut off all Western financial facilities to (prohibit current transactions with) UESR and other bloc members and their nationals.	11.d. NATO Powers	11.d. State Commerce Treasury	11.d. US would experience no legal problems in doing this (see Appendix B).
UK could curtail or stop activities of Communist controlled banks in UK. New legislation would be required for placing ban on accounts of Soviet bloc nationals using ordinary banking facilities. Some would apply in all Sterling Area countries. Because of large number of countries using sterling, it would be very difficult to arrange for its total denial from all sources to Soviet bloc.
12. Expel Soviet technical experts and foreign trade officials without diplomatic immunity from NATO countries.	12. NATO Powers	12. State	12. UK would have no legal or administrative problem.
13. Close Soviet trade missions, including Antorg offices.	13. NATO Powers	13. State Commerce Justice	13. UK would have no legal problem.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 163 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.