Documents / FOIA release

/specialCollection/BerlinWall/1961-Summer/1961-07-12c.pdf

Central Intelligence Agency · 163 pages · text by OCR

This Top Secret study by the Interdepartmental Coordinating Group on Germany and Berlin, dated July 12, 1961, and released by the Central Intelligence Agency, answers NSC Directive No. 58 of June 30, 1961. It sets out courses of action for the Berlin crisis but does not judge their merits. It covers imminent presidential decisions, a three-phase timetable running to January 1, military preparations and mobilization, covert action, economic sanctions, public information, negotiating positions and checkpoint procedures for East German personnel.

  • p. 17 …Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF), and the Military Sea Transport Service (MSTS). (5) Increase US war reserve…
  • p. 20 …air and remainder of the division by sea as follows: a. Two battle groups by airlift…
  • p. 21 …from British ports and in the Norwegian Sea. If this movement were carried out during July…
  • p. 23 …Since denial of the right to navigate freely on the high seas would unquestionably be viewed…
  • p. 26 …Soviet and GDR shipping on the high seas for a wide range of reasons such as…
  • p. 29 …For full control of the high seas and international airspace, mobilization measures involving activation of naval…
  • p. 36 …Review readiness status of all STRAC units and supporting units, together with appropriate sea and air…
  • p. 66 …UK would be hampered by commitments under the International Convention on Safety of Life at Sea…
# ECONOMIC SANCTIONS AND THEIR POSSIBLE PHASES OF APPLICATION

## PHASE III (cont'd)

Nature of Allied Harassment, Countermeasures or other Action	Countries Taking Action	US Action Agencies	General Comment
10. Terminate trade agreements involving Soviet bloc countries.	10. NATO Powers	10. State	10. US has no legal problems with respect to USSR but has no trade agreements with it. Legal and other problems arise with respect to other bloc countries particularly Poland and Czechoslovakia.

No new powers would be required for cancelling quotas for imports into UK, but some trade is carried on outside the agreements. Existing import licenses (valid for three months) would have to be honored.
11.a. Deny all exports to Soviet bloc countries.	11.a. NATO Powers	11.a.State Commerce Treasury AEC	11.a. US could encounter some legal problems relating to agricultural sales to Poland, since this could constitute a violation of any surplus agricultural commodities agreement then in force. No other US legal problem. System of international control would be required for effective implementation (see Appendices B and C).
b. Stop all Western imports from Soviet bloc countries.	b. NATO Powers	b.State Commerce Treasury	b. US has necessary legal authority (see Appendices B and C).

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 163 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.