Documents / FOIA release

/specialCollection/BerlinWall/1961-Summer/1961-07-12c.pdf

Central Intelligence Agency · 163 pages · text by GLM-OCR

This Top Secret study by the Interdepartmental Coordinating Group on Germany and Berlin, dated July 12, 1961, and released by the Central Intelligence Agency, answers NSC Directive No. 58 of June 30, 1961. It sets out courses of action for the Berlin crisis but does not judge their merits. It covers imminent presidential decisions, a three-phase timetable running to January 1, military preparations and mobilization, covert action, economic sanctions, public information, negotiating positions and checkpoint procedures for East German personnel.

  • p. 27 …Soviet-held Liberty ship. (b) With the cooperation of certain foreign governments establish a date for…
  • p. 33 …By the Secretary of Defense, in cooperation with the Director of OCDM, activating the Civil Reserve…
  • p. 125 …September 9 President requests all citizens to cooperate in objectives of the Defense Production Act. September…
  • p. 134 # SECRET # Appendix B The Swiss also are increasingly cooperating, but there are limits to the extent…
  • p. 135 …Should the present situation really develop into a substantial gold outflow, despite the cooperative efforts of…
  • p. 138 …available as a result of coordination and cooperation with our Allies. Actions to be taken under…
  • p. 142 …and Defense and the Director of USIA. Cooperation of the major radio-TV networks should be…
  • p. 143 …In other cases, the facilities and resources of the four may differ, thus making local cooperation…

Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.

## TOP SECRET

(5) Before such action could be fully affective in the above areas, understandings should be reached with the non-Bloc nations contiguous to the individual areas that they will not hinder our efforts to harass Soviet/GDR shipping. Area (a), Danish Belts and Kiel Canal, for example, would require at least passive approval of the operation by Norway, Sweden, Denmark and West Germany.

(6) Attempt to persuade Allied or other non-Bloc nations controlling the waterways referred to in subparagraph (4) to refuse rights of passage to, or to interfere by administrative delays and requirements with the passage of, Soviet and GDR shipping.

(7) As a form of legal harassment, consideration might be given to the following courses of action with respect to the aforementioned ships:

(a) As a test case, undertake the repossession of a Soviet-held Liberty ship.

(b) With the cooperation of certain foreign governments establish a date for the seizure and detention of all out-of-area US-titled Soviet merchant ships (emphasis to be placed on seizing and detaining the maximum number of Liberty's) on grounds that efforts to effect the return of these ships by negotiation have been exhausted.

(8) Deny Soviet and GDR shipping access for repairs, refuelling or commerce to ports controlled by US, Britath, France or West Germany, and encourage other nations to harass such shipping by denial of access or by administrative delays and requirements.

(9) The question of whether one or all of the above areas and measures would be undertaken should be resolved at the time in the light of the nature of the action against Berlin and the United States and Allied forces available.

b. Air Harassments. As in the case of naval harassments, air harassments and reprisals also provide a broad spectrum of possible alternatives such as the following:

(1) Issue orders

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 163 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.