Documents / FOIA release

1995-10-01a- CIA Conference Report: THE CHALLENGE OF ETHNIC CONFLICT TO NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ORDER IN THE 1990S GEOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVES 01-Oct-95

Central Intelligence Agency · 205 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, dated October 1995, contains the proceedings of a conference on ethnic conflict held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored it. Academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials presented papers on ethnic and territorial conflict in Eastern Europe, Western Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. They also discussed what these conflicts mean for US policy. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 50 …Muslim Serbs and Muslim Croats never defined them- selves as a people. They never said that…
  • p. 51 …If the standing why the Albanians never claimed Kosovo. Serbs really attempt to annihilate the Kosovar…
  • p. 62 …be taught as a second foreign language, never of relative insulation from other countries' problems as…
  • p. 78 …It never majority? Should the leftover colonials learn the was. It might be useful, instead, to…
  • p. 91 …As such, the ability of states to get from their people what they want has never…
  • p. 92 …much as they fight with other groups, and the same The peoples of Africa never chose…
  • p. 93 …I never would have sent them in the about election monitors. Is that sufficient to tide…
  • p. 109 …the provisions of this agreement were never imple- mented, and Kurdish autonomy became a dead issue…
  • p. 110 …only by those remaining in Lebanon, that prospect was never accepted by Muslims. The absence of…
  • p. 112 …field, several cities, and a population of never known democracy. Other hopes can be enter- 15…
  • p. 114 …But in this region we can never say never, as evi- Discussant: Mildred Berman denced by…
  • p. 116 …Although Sovietologists could never have predicted Introduction: The Disuniting of China the rapid events that dismantled…
  • p. 119 …The Chinese, in my opinion, never take China for granted, culturally, politically, or otherwise. This is…
  • p. 120 …Few have questioned how the Han became the 94-percent National identities, although imagined, are never…
  • p. 121 …be one reason why these categories have never been China is made crystal clear from his…
  • p. 123 …The Uighur will known as a "Ku Cong" nationalist, seeking recogni- never become independent as long…
  • p. 133 …such actions are sometimes trag- conflict should never be justified. Intervention, as we edies writ in…
  • p. 141 …guarantee Sociocultural identities in South Asia have never been some semblance of fair representation in the…
  • p. 147 …Although never posing a tional sentiment in regard to the controversial destruc- serious challenge to Congress…
  • p. 157 …The people in Kashmir are never represented the Sikh rank and file. alienated to a degree…
  • p. 166 …These are the people who have never had any form of internationally recognized status and who…
  • p. 169 …as we should not underestimate the state boundaries in illegal immigrants and never get counted. 159
  • p. 177 …The French nation never managed to incorpo- not co-opt civilians speaking German, Italian, and rate…
  • p. 186 …still hate Turks is that there has never been context is a complicated array of things…
  • p. 204 …In alluding to the statement by You are never going to have total agreement on mov…
C00123268
General Discussion The other thing we are seeing in Russia is not only the
non-Russians asking for or demanding as much inde-
QUESTION: Dr. Wixman, if we accept your analogy pendence or autonomy as they can get but also Rus-
that the disintegration of the Soviet Union can be sians declaring their independence as republics. So a
compared with the disintegrations of previous federation of maybe 88 republics may exist when
empires, can we also look at the Russian federation everything is finished. Russian localism is, in part, a
now as an empire? Is there a possibility of the Russian response and a reaction against minority nationalism,
federation also disintegrating like the Soviet Union? particularly among the nationally conscious groups
like the Tatars, but it also may reflect a limited level of
DR. WIXMAN: For the most part, no. There are very Russian nationalism itself that would be more centrip-
few regions of the Russian federation within which etal in its orientation.
the Russians are not the vast majority. Siberia and the
Far East is now-whatever it was before-extremely QUESTION: Of the 22 republics within the current
Russian in makeup. Russian federation, one has seceded, several others
have threatened to secede, and some are developing
The Russian Federation is basically Russia. The big- their own economic policies-in other words, eco-
gest threat to Russia today in terms of its internal terri- nomically seceding. Is the center giving power to the
torial integrity is not going to come from minorities. If regions or are the regions taking power from the cen-
I had to guess where a problem might arise, and I was ter? In the latter case, is it really a camouflage confed-
just there for the sixth time in .10 years, it is in the eration?
Russian Far East. I think that the Russians are going to
have more problems dealing with Russian territories DR. KAISER: This looks more to me like localism
that perceive themselves as different and that resent and regionalism than it does territorial nationalism. It
Muscovite rule than from the minorities themselves. is similar to the previous disintegrative process, but it
There is a strong movement in the Far East for that. does not appear as though an impetus for outright
independence exists to the same degree that it did at
DR. KAISER: I agree with parts of what Dr. Wixman the level of the Union republics. I should add a caveat
has said. As I indicated in my presentation, a sense of here: not all Union republics were equally secession-
national consciousness is something that typically pre- ist, and the Central Asian republics were not necessar-
cedes the drive for independence, and it is really ily all that proindependence when this process first
absent for the most part in a lot of these smaller non- began. It was the Baltic states that were pushing this
Russian groups to the east. One region that Dr. Wix- forward, and a kind of diffusion occurred from there.
man didn't mention, which I think is critically impor- Some of the republics even accepted independence as
tant, is the North Caucasus. It is an area without a a fait accompli after August 1991.
large Russian population. Russians are leaving that
area too, setting up the conditions through which a ris- In short, all the groups do not have to be nationalistic,
ing call for independence may occur. but the wave of territorial nationalism that is needed to
get the ball rolling toward the ultimate point of disin-
The Chechen republic, first of all, declared its inde- tegration currently does not appear to exist within the
pendence from the Chechen Ingush ASSR and Russian Federation.
declared its independence from Russia. It is the only
one that has actually declared its outright indepen- DR. WIXMAN: The real issue within the Russian
dence. At the same time, a lot of the North Caucasian state-with the few exceptions of some of the nation-
peoples have joined together in a confederation. They als on the periphery who are really inconsequential to
are still a part of Russia but almost once removed in
that sense.
71

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.