Documents / FOIA release

1995-10-01a- CIA Conference Report: THE CHALLENGE OF ETHNIC CONFLICT TO NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ORDER IN THE 1990S GEOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVES 01-Oct-95

Central Intelligence Agency · 205 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, dated October 1995, contains the proceedings of a conference on ethnic conflict held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored it. Academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials presented papers on ethnic and territorial conflict in Eastern Europe, Western Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. They also discussed what these conflicts mean for US policy. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 120 C00123268 Until now, most China scholars have dismissed the Anderson (1983), it is the feeling of…
  • p. 121 …In Ben Anderson's terms, Dr. Sun was engaged in "stretching the short, tight skin of…
  • p. 126 C00123268 References Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflec- Friedman, Edward 1993. "China's North-South Split tions…
  • p. 133 …the ruins of ancient civilizations (Anderson; 1991). The same passions that inflamed modern European Understanding the…
  • p. 135 C00123268 References Anderson, Benedict 1991. Imagined Communities: Hickey, Gerald 1982. Sons of the Mountains, Yale Reflections…
  • p. 182 …House, eds., London: Croom Helm, 1984, J. Anderson, "Nationalist ideology and territory," in pp. 168-190…
C00123268
repugnant to a pluralistic society such as the United first time in over 400 years, no major power sought
States. Ultimately, instability is not caused by demo- hegemony in Eastern Europe. With visions of a new
cratically expressed claims by individuals and Marshall Plan, the nations of Central and Eastern
national communities but by the denial of these Europe and the former Soviet Union understandable,
claims. if naively, believed that the West would willingly open
its doors-and coffers-to their former adversaries.
The above solutions should be categorically rejected. Despite rhetorical sympathy, this has not been the
Other policy prescriptions offer more traditional solu- case. Perhaps it was inevitable, but new (and age-old)
tions. In the name of stability, the Realpolitik school problems-ethnic strife, ultranationalism, and mas-
calls for working within the existing state system. The sive migration-quickly replaced Soviet Commu-
so-called Sonnenfeld Doctrine of the mid-1970s, in nism as the primary threats to Europe. When the walls
effect, accepted the status quo in Europe; that is, came down in the East, economic and other barriers
spheres of American and Soviet influence. The propo- were erected in the West. European governments,
nents of this school emphasize Principles 3 and 4 of beset by recession, worried more about halting the
the Helsinki Final Act, respectively the inviolability of westward flow of goods and people than about inte-
frontiers and respect for territorial integrity. What they grating the economies of the East into the European
fail to recall is that the Helsinki Final Act is a care- Community.
fully balanced document based on centuries of sad
European history. Using time-honored Jesuitical logic, Adrift between East and West, the countries of the
the Helsinki drafters declared that "all principles are former Warsaw Pact perceive themselves in a politi-
equal." The first Helsinki principle, for example, notes cal, economic, and security vacuum. And dema-
that "frontiers can be changed by peaceful means and gogues, often seeking ethnic scapegoats, plow fertile
agreement. Thus the United States recognized the fields of public discontent. Without a sense of being
peaceful unification of Germany in 1990 and the part of a larger community-governed by accepted
peaceful dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. rules of behavior-neo-Communist and ethnic nation-
alist may once again set the rules.
The Wilsonian model, on the other hand, stresses the
promotion of ethnic rights through national self-deter-
mination. It has certain academic allure. However, as The Nation-State and Ethnic Rights
much as European statesmen paid lipservice to this
ideal at Versailles, it was more honored in the breech What type of state structure can best protect the ethnic
than the observance in the interwar period. Moreover, groups of Europe? The European nation-state has
carried to its discouragingly logical conclusion, this been both the traditional protector and persecutor of
model, like Russian nesting dolls, might well lead to a indigenous ethnic groups. Historically, both Germany
state structure composed of increasingly small (and and Russia have assumed a special responsibility for
untenable) states-Yugoslavia divided into five or six their ethnic counterparts wherever they might live.
states; Bosnia divided into three states; or the Soviet (Even today, Germany grants automatic citizenship to
Union divided into 15 states, Russia (or Georgia) all ethnic Germans.) These same nation-states, how-
divided into x states, ad infinitum, ever, have a melancholy history regarding the treat-
ment of-other minority ethnic and religious groups. By
the same token, the decline of the nation-state, partic-
From Marx to Milosovic ularly in the East, can also lead to increased ethnic
tensions, as we have witnessed in the former Yugosla-
For many the collapse of the Soviet Union represented via. If the traditional nation-state system has often
the ultimate triumph of Western liberal democracy.
Marxist-Leninism had been thoroughly discredited
as a method of-organizing society. Moreover, for the
180 -

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.