Documents / FOIA release

1995-10-01a- CIA Conference Report: THE CHALLENGE OF ETHNIC CONFLICT TO NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ORDER IN THE 1990S GEOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVES 01-Oct-95

Central Intelligence Agency · 205 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, dated October 1995, contains the proceedings of a conference on ethnic conflict held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored it. Academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials presented papers on ethnic and territorial conflict in Eastern Europe, Western Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. They also discussed what these conflicts mean for US policy. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 120 C00123268 Until now, most China scholars have dismissed the Anderson (1983), it is the feeling of…
  • p. 121 …In Ben Anderson's terms, Dr. Sun was engaged in "stretching the short, tight skin of…
  • p. 126 C00123268 References Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflec- Friedman, Edward 1993. "China's North-South Split tions…
  • p. 133 …the ruins of ancient civilizations (Anderson; 1991). The same passions that inflamed modern European Understanding the…
  • p. 135 C00123268 References Anderson, Benedict 1991. Imagined Communities: Hickey, Gerald 1982. Sons of the Mountains, Yale Reflections…
  • p. 182 …House, eds., London: Croom Helm, 1984, J. Anderson, "Nationalist ideology and territory," in pp. 168-190…
C00123268
US Policy Perspectives: rights, not group entitlements. Second, it calls for a
A Conceptual Approach Europe that is both more united and more autono-
mous. More autonomous in the sense that decisions
are made-on a practical, not ideological basis-at
Jon Gundersen the lowest possible administrative level. At the same
US Department of State time, autonomy can lead to anarchy and increased eth-
nic strife unless guided by universal, shared values.
Americans are uncomfortable with ethnic politics. Therefore, the paper suggests ways to create civil
Why shy away from distinction based on race, reli- societies in the East and to integrate these societies
gion, or nationality-at least in our public rhetoric. into a democratic family of nations.
During the Cold War, ethnic conflicts were under-
standably ignored by Western policymakers. Forty
plus years of finely crafted and cleared NATO talking Ethnic Issues in Bipolar World
points provided all the answers we seemed to need in
a bipolar world. In a brave new Europe, without an Since the end of World War II, we viewed our policy
identifiable enemy, we now have to think for a living. in Europe through the optics of the Cold War. The pol-
icy of containment-with NATO as its operative man-
The ethnic killing fields of Bosnia confronted the ifestation-aimed at providing collective defense
West with a number of options-all of them unattrac- against a real Soviet threat. In this regard, the policy
tive. Compassion fatigue set in when our initial was extraordinarily successful. We deployed our
attempts to draw up convoluted ethnic maps were forces and accomplished our mission without a shot
rejected and scenes of starving babies became all to being fired. In the process, we helped build viable
commonplace on CNN. Was this fratricide not a democracies and, ultimately, witnessed the systematic
uniquely Balkan curse, Europeans silently wondered? and systemic defeat of our main adversary.
Could we not quarantine the carriers? This approach,
of course, provided a convenient rationale for Western In a bipolar world, however, other issues, such as eth-
noninvolvement. It is also proved to be wishful and nic conflicts, were largely ignored by Western policy-
dangerous thinking, makers. In the West, the emphasis was on centrally
organized solutions to security and economic prob-
Setting aside the humanitarian rationale, there is a lems; for example, NATO and the EC. While these
compelling strategic argument for Western engage- organizations have fulfilled their primary Cold War
ment. The nations of the East already perceive them- missions of uniting Western Europe, they have tended
selves in a political, economic, and security vacuum. to avoid, perhaps understandably, issues such as
Without a sense of being part of a larger community- national identity, regional autonomy, and ethnic con-
governed by accepted rules of behavior-neo-Com- flict. Few commentators were prepared, for example,
munist and ethnic nationalists may once again set the for the anti-Brussels backlash following Maastrict. In
rules. Already the unprecedented flows of refugees the East, more ominously, long-simmering ethnic dis-
from the East have spilled over even to prosperous putes remained submerged or suppressed by totalitar-
avenues of Paris and Frankfurt. Xenophobia and eth- ian regimes controlled by Moscow. There was no
nic politics have become forces to be reckoned with chance to resolve differences in an open and evolu-
throughout the West. tionary manner. Moreover, generations of Western
diplomats, scholars, and journalists working out of
Ethnic conflict will be on the international agenda for Moscow-and Belgrade-rarely journeyed to the
the foreseeable future. This paper traces the historic provinces. If they did, they were greeted by party loy-
and philosophical reasons why Americans have been alists who owed their positions to the central authori-
so ill prepared to confront the issue and then suggests ties. In a sense, we tacitly accepted the Leninist
a conceptual framework to deal with ethnic conflict in imposed view of the new man shorn of ethnic identity.
Europe. First, it argues that we should look at the eth-
nic issue through the prism of individual and human
178

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.