Documents / FOIA release
This Central Intelligence Agency Directorate of Intelligence assessment, dated January 1985, examines how Warsaw Pact air forces would support large strategic operations in Central Europe. It concludes that the Soviets see NATO air power as the greatest threat to a Pact ground offensive. They revised their air supremacy plans in 1980 and 1981 to use sector-concentrated raids and a defensive air operation. The assessment also finds that heavy aircraft losses and limited deep attack capability would remain serious problems. The document has no UFO content.
“Headquarters”10 pages
TopScret to obtain sector air balance advantages. Our analysis lank sectors-especially airfields housing units with of the air balance indicates that sufficient advantages nuclear roles-to justify expending ful-scale massed could be achieved easily by dividing the Western air raids on them. Nevertheless, with a substantial TMO into several relatively narrow "operational reinforcement advantage, the Sovicts probably could axes," such as the five or six that the Soviets describe devise a set of three attack sectors that would permit in their writings about front and army operations (as favorable air balance advantages in each sector by shown in figure 5). We believe the Soviets plan to use distributing the targets more evenly. Moving the air no more than three sectors in the air operation, operation sector boundaries away from the front however, because their military writings state that sector boundaries would, however, be done at the they expect to conduct only six to eight massed air expense of a more complex command and control raids in the operation and that repeated attacks must arrangement. be made against each target airfield (and hence against each sector), Using more than three attack Our preliminary analysis indicates that the Soviets sectors would, according to our analysis, also run are more likely to favor a system of two attack sectors counter to other operational considerations. Each of than they are a set of three sectors, regardless of four or more sectors probably would be too narrow to whether the Pact has three or four first-echelon accommodate more than one major air defense pene- fronts. A two-sector scheme probably permits the tration corridor. We believe the Pact airspace man- Pact to achieve its best possible combination of air agement system would be overwhelmed if the Pact balance advantages in all sectors, because most or all tried to funnel through a single corridor a massed air of the powerful Soviet front air forces in the center of raid of the magnitude contemplated in Soviet writ- the TMO could participate in both attack sectors. It ings. Mijor reductions in the size of the raids would also has the advantage of reducing to a minimum the necessarily prolong the operation. Moreover, the number of massed air raids (and hence the length of greater the number of sectors used, the longer it time) required to subject NATO's nuclear forces in all would take the Pact to subject the NATO nuclear sectors of the TMO to intensive air attacks. Similarly, forces in all of the sectors to intensive air attacks.E it allows repeated airfield attacks to be made in each sector of the TMO in the shortest possible time. A two-sector system also could case airspace tanage- The Soviets could simplify command and control of mient burdens somewhat by increasing the spacing the massed air raids by using three air operation between the penetration corridors to match that envi- sectors that correspond with the sectors of responsibil- sioned by the Soviets in TMO-wide massed raids (as ity of their typical three first-echelon fronts, but we illustrated in figure 10). Additionally, command and believe this advantage would be overshadowed by control might be simplified in a four-front disposition failure to satisfy their air balance requirements. Coor- if the boundary between the air operation attack dination and airspace management could be simpli- sectors was made to correspond with the boundary fled by using only a single front air force in each separating the objectives of the two fronts in the massed raid and by drawing on the same front for all center. Despite all of the benefits inherent in a two- the other joint forces front participants. According to sector system, however, in our calculations (figure 19) our air balance calculations, this scheme would allow the Pact still must achieve a distinct reinforcement the Pact to easily achieve doctrinally favorable air lead over NATO to create better than a marginally balance advantages in the coastal and southwestern favorable sector air balance advantagd front sectors, but it would result in almost no chance of obtaining a suflicient advantage in the critical central front sector (figure 18). In our calculations, this is because the central sector would contain over 70 percent of the NATO air forces' combat potential in the TMO. We believe this scheme also is flawed because here may be too few airfield targets in the 75 TokpSecret
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 95 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.