Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Air Forces: Support of Strategic Operations in Central Europe, CIA/DI/SOVA Intelligence Assessment, January 1985.

Central Intelligence Agency · 95 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency Directorate of Intelligence assessment, dated January 1985, examines how Warsaw Pact air forces would support large strategic operations in Central Europe. It concludes that the Soviets see NATO air power as the greatest threat to a Pact ground offensive. They revised their air supremacy plans in 1980 and 1981 to use sector-concentrated raids and a defensive air operation. The assessment also finds that heavy aircraft losses and limited deep attack capability would remain serious problems. The document has no UFO content.

  • p. 6 'op\Secret %writingsindicate that the newly created wartime theater high command headquarters was designated as the…
  • p. 10 …appendix D wartime of high command headquarters in the most important TMOs as extensions of the…
  • p. 23 …of the initial aircommand, front, and army headquarters, to allow operation also emphasizes the need to…
  • p. 31 …be conducted under the direction of the headquarters of the Sovict Air Defense Forces in Moscow…
  • p. 35 …increasingly difficult a large number of cooperating headquarters. It would problem for the Pact air defense…
  • p. 49 …day during a rapidly presumably high command headquarters would plan moving Pact offensive. Thus, for example…
  • p. 90 …protection for aviation formations and army aviation headquarters airborne and amphibious operations and for strike elements…
  • p. 91 …Front air forces headquarters and corps-size groupings of tactical-level forces. Oper- would coordinate and…
  • p. 93 …Tactical forces ducted for the General Staff and the TMO high have headquarters staffs of limited…
  • p. 94 …Intelligence collection per- formed for ground army and division headquarters, primarily to support the planning and…
Top Secret
Future Soviet Initiatives. We believe the Soviets probably are giving high
priority to new long-term initiatives aimed at improving their prospects for
winning air supremacy in Central Europe. We base this conclusion on the
great importance that the Soviets place on achieving this objective and on
our judgment that the Soviets probably are not content with the less
desirable alternatives to the theaterwide air operation that they recentlyhave developed as a matter of necessity. The Soviets' intentions are not
clear, but some of the initiatives that they might pursue could alter the
character of their air supremacy campaign:
- The Soviets may hope that extensive force modernization with the new
SU-27 and MIG-29 fighters will improve the air balance by the mid-
19 9 0s enough to justify a return to the theaterwide air operation as their
best option at the outset of war.
-- - The deployment of large numbers of these advanced fighters also could,
in conjunction with improved NATO airfield hardening and intelligence
warning capabilities, lead the Soviets to rely more heavily on air-to-air
combat to destroy NATO air forces in the air operation.
- The widespread use of terminal guidance on Soviet short-range ballistic
missiles by the early-to-middle 1990s could give these conventionally
armed missiles a major airfield pin-down role in the air operation as a
prelude to the bomber attacks. This could help the Pact achieve tactical
surprise and make NATO airfields more lucrative targets.
- The Soviets may eventually develop special air defense suppression
drones and eflicient air-delivered airfield attack munitions, which could
allow them to execute the air operation using considerably fewer aircraft
and less rigid and predictable employment concepts.
iup,S~crct vi

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 95 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.