Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Air Forces: Support of Strategic Operations in Central Europe, CIA/DI/SOVA Intelligence Assessment, January 1985.

Central Intelligence Agency · 95 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency Directorate of Intelligence assessment, dated January 1985, examines how Warsaw Pact air forces would support large strategic operations in Central Europe. It concludes that the Soviets see NATO air power as the greatest threat to a Pact ground offensive. They revised their air supremacy plans in 1980 and 1981 to use sector-concentrated raids and a defensive air operation. The assessment also finds that heavy aircraft losses and limited deep attack capability would remain serious problems. The document has no UFO content.

  • p. 16 …Europe primarily to support the Combined Baltic Sea Fleet, (thc FRG. Dcnmark the Nethertands, and Belgium…
  • p. 32 …303}5 12-54 Smolensk strategic air army and the Baltic Sea Fleet egional opera- air…
  • p. 42 …between the twostrategic zone and the North Sea. Most primary sectors a series of operational phases…
  • p. 44 …would be carriers operating in the North Sea. This mission aircraft in the open, but the…
  • p. 50 …Sea Fleet-also a Western TMO asset-is responsible for targets in the North Sea, We…
  • p. 51 …The depth of airstrikes Sea. Medium bomber targets are not likely to bewould be limited by…
  • p. 52 …Sea Fleet 0 35b 5the FEBA (including Denmark and the polish-DR Front 75 25Baltic Sea…
  • p. 54 …missile strike air division of the Baltic Sea Fleet AF have nuclearof the Smolenk SAA. e…
  • p. 57 …a Targets within the strike demarcation line except those covered by the Baltic Sea Fleet. b…
  • p. 62 …doing, they would seal off the Baltic Sea, securing the establishment of a penetration corridor through…
  • p. 63 …Sea a rrq sit fodee tn na a foce th r andr securingF}the sea ar…
  • p. 64 …as joint operations between the Combined Baltic Sea Fleet and the - coastal (normally Polish-GDR) front…
  • p. 65 …and missile force of the Combined Baltic Sea Fleet in supporting capabilities and are heavily dependent…
  • p. 66 …and could be\ajrcraft fromn the Baltic Sea Fleet The Blinder recon---objects of final reconnaissance…
  • p. 79 …and possibly aircraft carriers in the North Sea front air force-usually the fifth front in…
To Secet
Figure 15 (continued)
Estimated Available Fighter Cover on Day Five of the War'
..............
Force Available Resources Tasked Aircraft on Station
Sorties __
Aircraft Pilots Day Night
Polish-GDR Front 65 125 216 to 324 Four to eight Two
Legnica SAA 80 155 240 to 360 F-ur to right Two
Data have been rounded to the nearest 5. performance capabilities, without compensating for representativedThe S tylally task a sortie rate of two regimental sorties on operational planning considerations. Ground control of interceptorsday 6 ut we believe they might specify the maximum is assumed not to be a limiting factor on these intercept radiiplannin -rge-ra of three regimental sorties to be flown in because shipboard controllers could be used. The Polish aircraft aresupport of the amphibious operation on day one of the landing (the MIG-21 Fishbeds, and the Legnica SAA aircraft are assumed to benumber spread in the tabulation reflects the difference between M IG-23 Floggers. (Two of the Legnica SAA regiments, howeverdaily sortie rates of two and three). We believe that a regimental arc currently operating the less capable MIG-21 Fishbed but arc
sortic is a standard firepower and logistics calculating factor that scheduled to reequip with the SU-27 Flanker during the mid-equates to 40 aircraft sorties for a Soviet fighter regiment. We 1980s-which we believe probably will have a radius of actionestimate a Polish regimental sortie to be about 36 aircraft sorties. similar to the Flogger's
Soviet planning norms specify that pilots can fly an average of two u We assume that the Polish tactical fighter division and thesorties a day, but no more than three flights in any one 24-hour Legnica SAA fighter division are committed entirely to the am-period. Aircraft, however, are said to be capable of making four to phibious operation, leaving only two GDR NAD fighter wings tosix fights in 24 hours under surge-operating conditions. A sortie provide all fighter support for coastal front operations and northernrate of either two or three regimental sorties can thus be supported GDR airspace security. We also assume that both divisions havewith the postulated resources available (each aircraft would fly suffered 2 5-percent attrition during the first four days of combatthree-to-five-combat sorties, and each pilot would perform an and have operational readiness rates of 80 er enthescirures areaverage of about 1.5 or 2.5 flights a day). representative of datr The estimated number of aircraft that could be maintained on r We assume that the uto-coi at aircrat ratto was 14:1 at thestation in the fighter cover orbits is based on the assumptions that outset of the war and that noneof the pilots shot down during thethe aircraft always operate in two-ship formations, that each flight first four days of combat had returned for duty with their units.of fighters would spend about 20 minutes on station. and that the
fighter cover would be maintained around the clock. We also
assume that at least two-thirds of the fighter cover sorties would be
flown during daylight when NATO would be expected to mount the
heaviest opposition. The number spread reflects the difference
between a daily sortie rate of two or three and provides for an
intensified level of efort during part of daylight. The intercept radii
that are 75 to 90 km beyond the fighter orbits depicted on the map
were estimated using Soviet operational planning data. They reflect
the average coverage for a fighter carrying one external fuel tank,
four air-to-air missiles, and fuel allowance for five minutes of
combat at "military power." These radii would be greater if they
were based on US technical estimates of maximum aircraft
contributed by Poland, the USSR, and the GDR."=
amphibious landings have been direct-
y supported by airborne landings.
Participants. Amphibious hinding operations in the
Baltic area would be conducted as joint operations
between the Combined Baltic Sea Fleet and the -
coastal (normally Polish-GDR) front. The amphibious
assault landing forces in these operations would be
55 Top ecret

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 95 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.