Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 25 …and subsidiary systems such as command and control, radioelectronic combat (REC), and reconnais- sance data link…
  • p. 31 …Some of these submarines might alternatively have missions of minelaying near NATO naval bases or patrolling…
  • p. 33 …The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against…
  • p. 42 …The USSR attributes a littoral of Europe have significant capabilities in either broad range of missions…
  • p. 51 …Improved models of the radio-controlled The SA-9 and ZSU-23-4 are probably with…
  • p. 55 …All Pact countries have well-organized mobili- direct control of the VGK to tactical-level missions…
  • p. 58 …These have pervasive control over the soldier's activities and commanders are expected to be closely…
  • p. 59 …Frontal Aviation missions include counterair, ground attack, Warsaw Pact Fixed-Wing Tactical Aircraft reconnaissance, electronic warfare…
  • p. 62 …Pilot Training and Proficienc. 3Y US stand- facilities, hardening command and control facilities, and establishing pipeline…
  • p. 66 …control system which is designed to provide the coordination necessary to conduct close-in missions when…
  • p. 68 major ground formations is used by tactical controllers conventional weapons or to have an operational weap…
  • p. 71 …countries, are tailored primarily for control of guished by missions: antiship strike, reconnaissance those two seas…
  • p. 75 …missions of the Warsaw Pact's general purpose naval forces are to exercise sea control 110…
  • p. 84 …this mission. The combat radii of Soviet ASM-equipped naval Capabilities for Exercising Sea Control in…
  • p. 85 …signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the second view are the Director, Defense…
  • p. 87 …the Soviets, Poles, and East Germans other missions. Most bombers would be required for have the…
  • p. 118 …would be detached from national control. Re- - The Western TVD. This theater would include, sidual forces…
  • p. 122 …and control functions is central to Soviet control and integration of Pact military operations. Such groups…
  • p. 134 …against HEAT ammunition, the Soviets have incorpo- control and combat support communication links. rated composite or…
  • p. 135 …The Air Operation have been ascertained from classified missions assigned to the NSWP forces are intended…
  • p. 141 …Pact air forces to perform their primary missions in poor flying weather. ould be the preferred…
  • p. 143 …Others believe that no judgment with flying combat missions at low altitudes or over long any…
  • p. 158 …The establishment of control of the Norwegian drastically the likelihood of a major, preemptive at- and…
  • p. 163 …aircraft carrier probably would be unable secondary mission of antiship attack. The Kiev prob- to cope…
  • p. 175 …be building a mand and control and electronic warfare missions. force capable of siniultaneously lifting much…
  • p. 176 …The Pact's early warning network is scheduled current roles of sea control in limited areas…
  • p. 178 …We do not know how the Soviets assess the achieving sea control and in providing support…
  • p. 182 …subma- to control Pact forces once they are released from rines with peripheral missions declines, some…
  • p. 186 …Soviet sea control capabilities gravity to require an early Soviet counteraction. The against US carrier and…
i ~ToP
similar to the Scaleboard missile in range capability clear capabilities to be prepared for the more serious
but probably has improved accuracy and warheads. nuclear war contingency.
165. Soviet Nuclear Weapons Storage Sites in
161. Nuclear Artillery. The Soviets have 250 to 300 Eastern Europe. There are 23 Soviet storage sites in
nuclear-capable artillery pieces in their forces in the Eastern Europe, at least some of which almost certain-
western USSR. Nuclear-capable 203-mm self-proEleven of them are
pelled guns and 240-mm self-propelled mortars have located at Soviet tactical airfields, and 12 are isolated
been identified in two heavy artillery units there. Five installations for the storage of warheads for tactical
other heavy artillery units there are equipped with isileand rthe figre II-27.)
obsolete 203-mm and 240-mm weapons. No Soviet missiles and rockets. (See figure 11-27.)
heavy artillery units have been identified outside the
USSR. it is also
believed-ulilely that these installations, with their
extensive security, high-quality support facilities, and
in most instances apparently continuous occupation by
. Soviet troops, would be maintained simply as future
l'here is n o reliable evi staging points for warheads moved from the USSR in
dence that the Soviets have nuclear rounds for their time of tension or after a conflict began. We do not
152-mm artillery pieces-the largest now in the forces believe that the NSWP countries operate or control
in Central Europe. any of the nuclear storage sites in Eastern Europe.
162. Soviet nuclear artillery developments suggest 166.
that the expanded use of Frontal Aviation is regarded
as only a partial solution to the problems of providing
close-in nuclear support to Pact ground forces. Soviet
writings have long acknowledged that, because
NATO's nuclear-capable artillery would be deployed
close to the battleline, Pact artillery fire would be the
most effective and responsive means for destroying it.
163. Naval Forces. All fleets in the Soviet Navy are
also equipped with nuclear-capable weapon systems There is no firm evidence regarding the mix of
for use in theater warfare. Virtually all of the USSR's weapons stored in these bunkers, the portion of the
operational submarines carry nuclear interior space used for storage, or that reserved for
torpedoes, and at least half of the missiles on board -arhead_assembh, maintenance and checkout.
Soviet cruise-missile submarines are equipped with
nuclear warheads. This loading reflects the Soviet
belief that, although war could begin conventionally in
Europe, it would be fought under constant threat of 167. Depending on the type stored and storage
escalation to the use of nuclear weapons. practice, the storage sites in Eastern Europe could hold
a total of 370 to 1,070 tactical nuclear bombs, and
1,700 to 2,900 FROG and Scud warheads. Table II-11
contains the-range_of estimatesof-storage caoacitvt
164. During the conventional phase of hostilities,
about a third of the Navy's strike aircraft probably
would be held in reserve for nuclear operations.
Several Soviet writers also have indicated that a
"large" reserve of submarines and nuclear-capable 168. There is no firm evidence on Pact require-
surface ships might be withheld until the transition to ments for tactical nuclear warheads and bombs in
nuclear war. The Soviets evidently see the risk of Central Europe. It seems clear, however, that the
escalation to nuclear war to be so high that they are Soviets currently consider their requirements to be
willing to sacrifice a substantial degree of their nonnu- higher than those envisioned by Pact planners as late
11-47
Top~e

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.