Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 11 …Forces in the Moscow, volga, Ural, and Turkestan Military Districts could be used against NATO or…
  • p. 27 …initiate such use, although the possibility cannot be entirely excluded. DIA, NSA, Army, Navy, and Air…
  • p. 28 …DIA and Navy estimate that six to 10 reserve submarines could be brought to operational status…
  • p. 29 …CIA, State, NSA, and Navy estimate that the performance characteristics, deployment patterns, training programs, and exercise…
  • p. 30 …DIA, NSA, Army, Navy, and Air Force hold that the Soviets might choose to attack with…
  • p. 31 …Likelihood of Soviet Use of Nuclear Weapons at Sea Before Their Use on Land. Navy judges…
  • p. 56 Aviation (VTA) were used simultaneously, only one increasing amount of complex equiprnent entering the fully equipped…
  • p. 70 …but Aeroflot's 160 AN-12s could be used to lift heavy During peacetime, these Cubs…
  • p. 79 designed primarily for use against large-area targets, and speeds and maximum ranges of from 80…
  • p. 82 …The Pact navies must seek out Bear D aircraft. The Kiev can also receive targeting Western…
  • p. 84 …The Pact countries can concentrate ASW forces and use Pact navies maintain the bulk of their…
  • p. 85 …NATO placed on resources by the Soviet Navy's other mis- decision not to deploy carrier…
  • p. 87 …Thus the Pact would German Navies are capable of transporting less than probably commit few bombers…
  • p. 88 …As of 1975, however, weapons are also carried by many of the Soviet Navy's only…
  • p. 90 …that the expanded use of Frontal Aviation is regarded as only a partial solution to the…
  • p. 92 …submarines would be likely to be used to strike targets in NATO Europe, and the 150…
  • p. 96 …long-range bomber with the capability to strike US From Liepaja, G-II class submarines fitted…
  • p. 100 …the Directorof Naval Intelligence, Department of the Navy. The longer range and radius values in the…
  • p. 113 …Aboard ship the Soviets currently use a scheduled inspection 249. The Soviet Navy has the capability…
  • p. 114 …In addition, the Navy has the option of using merchant communications circuits for command and control…
  • p. 115 …In addition, the Soviet Navy could station an there, railroads and poor-quality highways extend to…
  • p. 122 …Some common computer programs are being used for logistics and battle management sup- 13. In wartime…
  • p. 145 Top Table IV-4 Warsaw Pact General Purpose Naval Forces Estimated To Be Available for Use…
  • p. 146 …German some extent by a shuttle using conventional landing Navies, plus mobilized merchant ships. Assault forces…
  • p. 147 …If the amphibious assaults sary to use far larger forces to escort convoys than were canceled…
  • p. 148 …Eastern Europe and the USSR by the US 6th sweeping NATO's mines or of successfully…
  • p. 152 …follow with strikes using air-to-surface missiles (ASMs),- The Bulgarian and Romanian Navies. Does not…
  • p. 154 …Many have air defense missiles which can be used in an antiship 143. Some believe " that…
  • p. 156 …Soviet Northern Fleet would be used to available LRA and Navy bombers. But we do not…
  • p. 158 …forces were optimized for maximum D-day impact, however, the Soviet Navy would give NATO early…
  • p. 159 …They probably Missile Cruisers 6 would attempt to use these submarines to intercept Cruisers ... 1 Missile…
  • p. 164 …mansk area can be covered by the long-range cruise missiles of the Soviet Navy's…
  • p. 165 …and conventionally armed area air defense against US and UK attacking aircraft missiles, thereby reducing the…
  • p. 168 …the Soviets would use aircraft mainly in battlefield strikes in close proximity to Pact forces, presumably…
  • p. 176 …This aircraft, which is optimized for short-haul Soviet Navy will produce a force with improved…
  • p. 177 …titanium hulls are used, the operational depth limit could reach about 600 meters. According to one…
  • p. 179 …Soviet Navy inventory of Polnoeny-class medium landing ships may also be planning to use the…
  • p. 180 …The Soviet Navy needs a long-range SAM mid-1980s. for defense beyond 20 nm, as…
  • p. 186 …Nonetheless, the would view the presence of US carriers operating in Soviets clearly regard the US…
  • p. 187 …The Soviet Navy maintains a small force in the to Middle Eastern oil were to become…
  • p. 188 …Cuban military contribution in support of Navy also uses port facilities in Benin and Angola but…
  • p. 200 …T s copy is for the iormation and use of the recipient and of persons under…
Table II-9 Northern Fleet submarine bases and the North
Atlantic sea lanes. They point out that if NATO
Estimated Torpedo Capacity for Soviet convoys were routed southward to reduce the
Attack Submarines _ danger from Pact aircraft, Soviet submarines
Long-Range Submarine Class Number of Torpedoes b would have to travel 2,500 to 3,500 nm; nuclear-
V 16-18 powered submarines traveling at 12 knots would
C 12 spend about 22 days in a round trip (6,000 nm) to
N 18-20 the sea lanes, while diesels averaging 5 knots
E-11 8 would spend 54 days in transit. The others note
J 6
r 22 that despite the long transit distances, Soviet
1 22 long-range attack submarines have the range to
z 22 undertake patrols in the North Atlantic sea lanes
Medium-Range Submarine Class of sufficient duration to have ample opportunity
W 12 to attack a number of Western ships.
R 14
- - - - ----- __- - - Combat Attrition. All agree that Soviet subma-
aAssumes each submarine carries a full load of 53-centimeter (7.8 rinesmbas in e Nor eet wouldthavbmao
meters long) antishipping torpedoes. rmes based m the Northern Fleet would have to
b The Director,Defense Intelligence Agency, points out that the travel through the Norwegian Sea and the G-I-
"full wartime load" of these submarinesis unknown and that these UK gap, areas which favor N ATO ASW efforts,
estimates are predicated on a loading under peacetime operating and that even on station, operating areas would
conditions of weapons of 53-cm diameter (7.8 meters long). His be continuously within range of NATO's land-
agency estimates that two 40-cm torpedoes (4.5 meters long)
probably could be substituted for each of up to six 53-cm.torpedoes based ASW aircraft, as well as other ASW plat-
in most classes. The Director of DIA notes, therefore, that the forms. The first view is that the resultant combat
wartime torpedo loads of these classes could be substantially attrition would be prohibitive. The second is that,
greater than shown although Soviet submarines would be particu-
larly open to attack by Western ASW forces at
S- Replenishment Opr e Tseveral points, this threat would be reduced by
holds that Soviet submarines would have to attacks against NATO ASW aircraft and bases,
on SIGINT facilities, and on facilities of the USreturn to home waters for resupply, that Soviet sound surveillance system (SOSUS).
naval support ships probably would not operate
outside Soviet-controlled waters because they - Target Information. The first group believes
would be vulnerable to attack, and that any that it would be difficult for attack submarines to
Soviet merchant ships at sea when war began identify high-value ships in ocean traffic contain-
probably would not be available by the time the ing many ships of low value. They note that
submarines exhausted their torpedoes. According under North Atlantic combat and weather condi-
to the second view, Soviet long-range attack tions, attacks on merchant ships would be likely
submarines can operate for periods of weeks to result in little more than random success at
without having to refuel and, conceivably, could destroying ships loaded with military cargoes
take on fuel from Pact merchant ships, and an instead of ships loaded with civilian industrial or
individual submarine would probably have suffi- other goods. The second group judges that the
cient time to attack its targets before having to Soviets probably would have clandestine report-
return to base for torpedo reloading. ing, including detailed information on cargoes
- Turnaround Time. All agree that Soviet subma- and ship departure times, as well as locating data
rines would have to spend some time in port from technical collection, including radar and
between patrols. The first group believes it might ELINT ocean reconnaissance satellites and long-
be as long as 25 days, which was the German range HF/DF. According to this view, the com-
experience in World War Ii. The second believes bination of these assets would likely provide the
the time could be compressed to less than 25 intelligence necessary to direct attacks on the
days, especially in a period of intense conflict. more valuable convoys and-with greater
difficulty-individual ships.
- Transit Distance. Holders of the first view be-
lieve that the effectiveness of Soviet submarines 148. All agree that, in a conventional war, the
would be impaired by the distance between the Soviets could attempt to disrupt port operations in
11-43

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.