Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 24 in NIE 11-4-78, Soviet Goals and Expectations in the Global Power Arena. We proceed…
  • p. 25 …We foresee no development over the next several years which would appreciably alter the basic Pact…
  • p. 26 …advances and ensure that combat potentials are fully realized. We expect a modest decline in the…
  • p. 28 …where the outcome is in serious doubt, the attractiveness of SLOC interdiction in advance of a…
  • p. 37 …qualitative and numerical advances in their forward- 12. Despite the Soviets' having adopted a policy for…
  • p. 40 …permit the high rates of appreciation of the risks and rewards of introducing advance which they…
  • p. 46 …The holders sion system, a more advanced and more powerful of this view are the Director…
  • p. 57 …The Soviets are attempting to provide quick difficulties in recruiting personnel for these programs. advancement and…
  • p. 63 combat capability of these units continues to be and 40 percent of the force is equipped…
  • p. 68 …reconnaissance erated by new, advanced air munitions are justified to units. The Soviets believe that a…
  • p. 69 …The Soviets have made some advances in irnproved infrared seeker, improved motors, and possi- streamlining their…
  • p. 85 …advance of a conflict goes up. signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the…
  • p. 103 …the immediate path of a Soviet advance probably They would be used against personnel in the…
  • p. 106 …judge the soundness of these Pact planning but representative models of this more advanced factors in…
  • p. 108 …the ability to sustain the momentum of an advance is determined not only by the availability…
  • p. 112 Top e ammunition, bombs, and rockets and some 23,700 tons duration, but could affect the…
  • p. 114 …emergency without the necessity of advanced notices and prior coordination. Thus, before the begin- ning of…
  • p. 119 …The Pact has made advance preparations to activated, their signal support units establish the con- man…
  • p. 126 …advance, Pact planners hope to overrun, penetrate, or bypass NATO 9. Pact planning for the Western…
  • p. 132 …Circumstances permitting, the Pact would build of advance. Depending on the importance of the axis up…
  • p. 133 …then disperse, continuing the barrage, the assaulting infantry and tank units, using advance or exploitation along…
  • p. 134 …Respites from combat would be used to Germany, and advance toward crossings over the restore the…
  • p. 147 …surface ships into the important for maintaining a high rate of advance North Sea prior to…
  • p. 149 …would use force to advance through Yugoslavia to 119. Against the Dardanelles and the Bosporus. attack…
  • p. 150 …overcome Turkish dlefenses and secure the and to advance to the Aegean Sea and from there…
  • p. 151 …In Initial Naval Operations in the Black Sea these exercises six Soviet divisions notionally advance 126…
  • p. 153 …Backfire strike aircraft can cover virtually the several hours in advance of the attack. Soviet ships…
  • p. 157 doubtful ability of ground forces advancing across land-based NATO air defense forces in northern and…
  • p. 172 …The changes will improve radiation weapons and advanced cruise missiles-may the combined-arms capabilities of…
  • p. 173 …The number of SP guns in the East German, Soviets are likely to continue the advances…
  • p. 174 …technology is believed to be more advanced speeds than the other Pact fighter-bombers. for these…
  • p. 175 …Soviet Military Trans- survivability of the helicopter in an advanced air port Aviation (VTA) will continue…
  • p. 176 …ships, submarines, and aircraft replace less capable units and the technology of cruise missiles is advanced…
  • p. 179 …the new LPDs and about six Ropuchas by the mid- Given the effort placed on advanced…
  • p. 180 …for defense beyond 20 nm, as well as more advanced 82. Tactical ASW Missiles. The SS…
  • p. 183 …support the developing centralized command struc- and the acquisition of some advanced electronic ture. The VAKSS…
  • p. 185 …The Soviets probably would consider that advances into Soviet territory during the early stages the risks…
Topeee
along with the Kyndas, can receive target data from extremely difficult. The Pact navies must seek out
Bear D aircraft. The Kiev can also receive targeting Western ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) and
data directly from radar and electronic intelligence counter Western attack submarines. Attacks on West-
satellites and possibly could use its V/STOL aircraft ern SSBNs would have to be undertaken in their
for targeting assistance. The remaining eight missile- worldwide patrol and base areas. The task of counter-
equipped ships are destroyers, each armed with four ing attack submarines would be markedly different for
missiles that can be fired to a maximum range of about protecting Pact forces in the approaches to the USSR,
45 nm (80 km). on the one hand, and for the protection of Soviet naval
operations in more distant waters, on the other.
1.24. Other Soviet surface combatants opposite
NATO which are equipped with antiship cruise mis-
ses lude 14 Nanuchka-class and about 75 Osa-classcapabilities on the whole ar extremely limited. The crucial Soviet shortcomings are
missile patrol boats. The former are fitted with six 60- lack of long-range submarine detection devices, the
nm (110-km) SS-N-9 missiles, while the Osa units have high radiated noise levels of Soviet submarines relative
four 19-nm (35-km) SS-N-2b or 45-nm (83-km) to those of the West, and the lack of seaborne tactical
SS-N-2c missiles each. Except for the SS-N-2 series, all air cover to protect deployed surface ship ASW forces.
current Soviet antiship cruise missiles are believed Nonetheless, virtually all modern Soviet surface com-
capable of carrying a nuclear or a conventional batants carry ASW weapons and sensors, and large
warhead. numbers of Soviet aircraft and helicopters are fitted
125. Although the Soviets have a large inventory of for ASW operations.
ships, submarines, and aircraft capable of conducting
attacks on NATO ships, the successful accomplishment 129. The forces opposite NATO which are most
of such strikes under wartime situations depends on a capable of ASW operations beyond coastal waters
variety of factors. Among the most significant are: the include about 50 Soviet principal surface combatants,"
effectiveness of Soviet ocean surveillance and elec- 30 nuclear-powered torpedo attack submarines, and
tronic warfare, the number of launch platforms avail- about 45 fixed-wing ASW aircraft. The 16 ships with
able for antiship use, the achievement of strategic or helicopters (those of the Kiev, Moskva, Kara, and
tactical surprise, and whether nuclear weapons are Kresta-II classes) and the Krivak frigates are equipped
used by the Soviets or NATO. With accurate targeting with long-range (15 to 30 nm, or 28 to 56 km) ASW
and the use of nuclear weapons in surprise attacks, the weapons. Only the Kiev- and Moskva-class units com-
Soviet naval forces normally deployed in peacetime bine these features with a long-range (typically less
would constitute a severe threat to NATO carriers and than 10 nm) active sonar and more than one helicop-
amphibious task groups in European waters. Timely ter. Soviet ASW helicopters, however, are limited in
warning of a Soviet attack, however, would allow their ASW operations at night and in bad weather.
NATO task forces to take action which could enhance
their survivability. 130. The V-class nuclear-powered attack subma-
rines, of which 19 are in the Northern Fleet, are the
126. The surface-to-air missile systems aboard some most capable Soviet submarines for ASW.
75 Soviet principal surface combatants can also be
used against surface ships. The most capable of these
systems is the SA-N-3, which has an operational range
of 10 to 20 nm (18 to 37 kin) in an antiship mode and
may have a nuclear as well as a conventional warhead.
This system is installed in the Soviet western fleets' 16
units of the Kiev, Moskva, Kara, and Kresta-II classes,
probably with magazine capacities of either 48 or 72
missiles. In addition, the ASW homing torpedo pay-
load of the SS-N-14 cruise missile could be used
against surface ships, but we consider this unlikely. 131. The Soviet medium- and long-range airborne
ASW capability consists of IL-38 May and TU-142
Antisubmarine Warfare Capabilities Bear F aircraft, which are equipped with sonobuoys
127. In a NATO-Warsaw Pact conflict, the Pact's " Ships of the Kiev, Moskva, Kresta-II, Kara, Kashin, Mod-
antisubmarine warfare tasks would be varied and Kashin, and Krivak classes.
11-39
o _~~e

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.