Documents / FOIA release
This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.
“Mission Control”29 pages
Top CHAPTER I WARSAW PACT POLICY AND DOCTRINE FOR THEATER WARFARE A. General Considerations larger, global balance and, accordingly, are inclined to L. It is Soviet policy to acquireand maintain forces be very cautious in the use of military force in Europe. capable of successfully fighting either a nuclear or 4. Soviet expenditures for general purpose ground, conventional war in Europe.' The Soviets take a air, and naval forces, as well as for those strategic conservative view of NATO's military capabilities and attack forces directed primarily at Eurasian targets, of the risks of instability in Eastern Europe. These are an important indicator of the USSR's emphasis on concerns and their evident conviction that military developing and maintaining its theater force capabili- power is a key element of a successful foreign policy ties. The Central Intelligence Agency estimates that of have led the Soviets, together with their Warsaw Pact total Soviet defense spending during the period 1967- allies, to keep a clear numerical edge over NATO, 77, almost 40 percent was devoted to procurement and especially in Central Europe, in important military operation of theater forces. (See figure 1-2.) Roughly assets such as tanks, artillery, and combat aircraft, and three-fourths of these outlays can in turn be directly to strive continually to close the technological gap. attributed to those theater forces arrayed opposite NATO. During this period, procurement of weapons, 2. The Soviets intend any future European conflict equipment, and spare parts accounted for more than to take place on Western, not Eastern, territory and three quarters of the USSR's outlays for theater forces. stress the need for large, combat-ready forces to be in ' Warsaw Pact military policy is synonymous with place at the outset of hostilities. The Soviets also Soviet policy. Soviet military policy is formulated at conclude that the initial stages of a conflict probably the highest military and political levels and derives would be fought with conventional weapons and that from Moscow's policies ith regard to its national even in the event of massive nuclear exchanges, large security requirements, its conception of the nature of a general purpose ground, air, and naval forces would be possible future war in Europe, and a desire to be the needed to defeat surviving NATO forces and occupy predominant military force on the Eurasian continent. Western Europe. In the Soviet view, Pact forces must be organized and 3. The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against a pean allies as vital to its national interests. The East NATO attack to launching a theater offensive. European members of the Pact provide sizable forces and a territorial buffer between NATO and the Soviet 6. A1strong, in-depth defense of the homeland is Union. (See figure 1-1.) The presence of or proximity basic to Soviet military doctrine. Moscow's war-fight- of large, well-equipped Soviet forces gives the Soviets ing strategy also dictates that Warsaw Pact forces considerable leverage in exerting control over these protect the Soviet homeland and lines of communica- countries, thus safeguarding the integrity of the Pact. tion so that an offensive or counteroffensive could be The Soviets also value their military strength as a successfully carried out. We find no evidence of an means of influencing European domestic and foreign intent on the part of the Soviets merely to defend policy decisions and deterring political or military territory. On the contrary, the hallmark of Soviet developments which might alter the balance of power military doctrine is offensive action. It provides the to hei diadvntge.Thedonot hwevr, easre motive force behind the Soviet emphasis on highto their dhisadlvantage. They (10 not, however, measurc oiefrebhn h oitepai nhg the military balance in Europe in isolation from the combat readiness, the desire to seize the initiative, and the requirement for substantial numerical superiority For an expanded discussion of Soviet military policy in Europe, in the main battle areas, backed by strong reserves, to see NIE 11-4-78, Soviet Goals and Expectations in the Global ensure the momentuin of the attack. Pact theater force Power Arena. developments over the past decade reflect a systematic I-1 Top au~
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.