Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 25 …and subsidiary systems such as command and control, radioelectronic combat (REC), and reconnais- sance data link…
  • p. 31 …Some of these submarines might alternatively have missions of minelaying near NATO naval bases or patrolling…
  • p. 33 …The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against…
  • p. 42 …The USSR attributes a littoral of Europe have significant capabilities in either broad range of missions…
  • p. 51 …Improved models of the radio-controlled The SA-9 and ZSU-23-4 are probably with…
  • p. 55 …All Pact countries have well-organized mobili- direct control of the VGK to tactical-level missions…
  • p. 58 …These have pervasive control over the soldier's activities and commanders are expected to be closely…
  • p. 59 …Frontal Aviation missions include counterair, ground attack, Warsaw Pact Fixed-Wing Tactical Aircraft reconnaissance, electronic warfare…
  • p. 62 …Pilot Training and Proficienc. 3Y US stand- facilities, hardening command and control facilities, and establishing pipeline…
  • p. 66 …control system which is designed to provide the coordination necessary to conduct close-in missions when…
  • p. 68 major ground formations is used by tactical controllers conventional weapons or to have an operational weap…
  • p. 71 …countries, are tailored primarily for control of guished by missions: antiship strike, reconnaissance those two seas…
  • p. 75 …missions of the Warsaw Pact's general purpose naval forces are to exercise sea control 110…
  • p. 84 …this mission. The combat radii of Soviet ASM-equipped naval Capabilities for Exercising Sea Control in…
  • p. 85 …signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the second view are the Director, Defense…
  • p. 87 …the Soviets, Poles, and East Germans other missions. Most bombers would be required for have the…
  • p. 118 …would be detached from national control. Re- - The Western TVD. This theater would include, sidual forces…
  • p. 122 …and control functions is central to Soviet control and integration of Pact military operations. Such groups…
  • p. 134 …against HEAT ammunition, the Soviets have incorpo- control and combat support communication links. rated composite or…
  • p. 135 …The Air Operation have been ascertained from classified missions assigned to the NSWP forces are intended…
  • p. 141 …Pact air forces to perform their primary missions in poor flying weather. ould be the preferred…
  • p. 143 …Others believe that no judgment with flying combat missions at low altitudes or over long any…
  • p. 158 …The establishment of control of the Norwegian drastically the likelihood of a major, preemptive at- and…
  • p. 163 …aircraft carrier probably would be unable secondary mission of antiship attack. The Kiev prob- to cope…
  • p. 175 …be building a mand and control and electronic warfare missions. force capable of siniultaneously lifting much…
  • p. 176 …The Pact's early warning network is scheduled current roles of sea control in limited areas…
  • p. 178 …We do not know how the Soviets assess the achieving sea control and in providing support…
  • p. 182 …subma- to control Pact forces once they are released from rines with peripheral missions declines, some…
  • p. 186 …Soviet sea control capabilities gravity to require an early Soviet counteraction. The against US carrier and…
(G-I-UK) gap probably would be designated a Maritime TVD, and
would include the Northern Fleet. The forces of the Baltic and Black
Sea Combined Fleets initially would be under the control of the
Western and Southwestern TVD headquarters-often called High
Commands by the Soviets. The senior field command would be the
front, an organization which is similar to a NATO army group in size,
level of command, and function and which consists of three to five
ground armies and an air army of 600 aircraft. (III, 7-10)
16. Our consideration of likely Pact operations in the Western TVD
during the initial phase of a conventional war has resulted in the
following key findings:
- Soviet military strategy calls for a massive and rapid ground
offensive into NATO territory in Central Europe to defeat
NATO forces, disrupt mobilization, and seize or destroy ports
and airfields to prevent reinforcement. (IV, 7)
- Except in extraordinarily urgent circumstances, the Pact would
prefer to prepare at least a three-front force before initiating
hostilities in Central Europe. We believe the Pact would begin to
organize at least five fronts for use in Central Europe from the
time of the decision to go to full readiness. There is virtually no
chance the Soviets would attack from a standing start.' (IV, 10-
22)
- Pact planners regard early attainment of air superiority and
destruction of much of NATO's tactical nuclear forces to be
critical to the Pact's chances for victory in the theater. The Pact
plans to achieve these objectives by conducting a large-scale,
theaterwide conventional air offensive during the first several
days of hostilities. (IV, 43-85)
- The broad objectives of Pact naval operations in the Baltic would
be to gain complete control of the Baltic Sea and access to the
North Sea to sever NATO's lines of communication in the North
Sea, and deprive NATO of potential launch areas for carrier
strikes against Pact air and ground, forces in the Central Region.
Failure to obtain air superiority and sea control probably would
force the Pact to reconsider its planned amphibious operations in
the western Baltic. (IV, 86-111)
17. As for operations in the Southwestern TVD, our conclusions are
as follows:
- The Pact would confine its initial ground operations to the
Turkish Straits area, Austria, and possibly eastern Turkey. In
' NIE 4-1-78, Warsaw Pact Capabilities for Going to War in Europe: Implications for NATO Warning
of War, provides the detailed rationale for these conclusions.
11
Top ~s.a

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.