Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 25 …and subsidiary systems such as command and control, radioelectronic combat (REC), and reconnais- sance data link…
  • p. 31 …Some of these submarines might alternatively have missions of minelaying near NATO naval bases or patrolling…
  • p. 33 …The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against…
  • p. 42 …The USSR attributes a littoral of Europe have significant capabilities in either broad range of missions…
  • p. 51 …Improved models of the radio-controlled The SA-9 and ZSU-23-4 are probably with…
  • p. 55 …All Pact countries have well-organized mobili- direct control of the VGK to tactical-level missions…
  • p. 58 …These have pervasive control over the soldier's activities and commanders are expected to be closely…
  • p. 59 …Frontal Aviation missions include counterair, ground attack, Warsaw Pact Fixed-Wing Tactical Aircraft reconnaissance, electronic warfare…
  • p. 62 …Pilot Training and Proficienc. 3Y US stand- facilities, hardening command and control facilities, and establishing pipeline…
  • p. 66 …control system which is designed to provide the coordination necessary to conduct close-in missions when…
  • p. 68 major ground formations is used by tactical controllers conventional weapons or to have an operational weap…
  • p. 71 …countries, are tailored primarily for control of guished by missions: antiship strike, reconnaissance those two seas…
  • p. 75 …missions of the Warsaw Pact's general purpose naval forces are to exercise sea control 110…
  • p. 84 …this mission. The combat radii of Soviet ASM-equipped naval Capabilities for Exercising Sea Control in…
  • p. 85 …signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the second view are the Director, Defense…
  • p. 87 …the Soviets, Poles, and East Germans other missions. Most bombers would be required for have the…
  • p. 118 …would be detached from national control. Re- - The Western TVD. This theater would include, sidual forces…
  • p. 122 …and control functions is central to Soviet control and integration of Pact military operations. Such groups…
  • p. 134 …against HEAT ammunition, the Soviets have incorpo- control and combat support communication links. rated composite or…
  • p. 135 …The Air Operation have been ascertained from classified missions assigned to the NSWP forces are intended…
  • p. 141 …Pact air forces to perform their primary missions in poor flying weather. ould be the preferred…
  • p. 143 …Others believe that no judgment with flying combat missions at low altitudes or over long any…
  • p. 158 …The establishment of control of the Norwegian drastically the likelihood of a major, preemptive at- and…
  • p. 163 …aircraft carrier probably would be unable secondary mission of antiship attack. The Kiev prob- to cope…
  • p. 175 …be building a mand and control and electronic warfare missions. force capable of siniultaneously lifting much…
  • p. 176 …The Pact's early warning network is scheduled current roles of sea control in limited areas…
  • p. 178 …We do not know how the Soviets assess the achieving sea control and in providing support…
  • p. 182 …subma- to control Pact forces once they are released from rines with peripheral missions declines, some…
  • p. 186 …Soviet sea control capabilities gravity to require an early Soviet counteraction. The against US carrier and…
0
attack on China could develop into a long-term, large- 1.0. The Soviets could elect to provide combat forces
scale commitment of manpower and materiel which to support an attack on South Korea by North Korea.
could degrade their European war effort, especially in If the Soviets adopted this strategy, they would have to
a prolonged conflict. consider whether it would provoke a US attack on
Soviet port facilities and the Pacific Fleet; and
7. A two-front war with China andl NATO would whether a military action against South Korea would
represent the worst case situation for the Soviets. It provoke the Japanese into a more active role in the
would involve major ground and tactical air units in area. They would also have to consider whether
Asia arid, depending on military developments, could supporting a North Korean attack on the South would
require the Soviets to draw upon their strategic reserve precipitate Chinese military action along the Sino-
force. Soviet reinforcements would be required to Soviet border. At the same time, the Soviets know that
defeat a large Chinese conventional attack or to US nuclear weapons are located in South Korea and
permit the Soviets any chance of overrunning all of would have to weigh the risk that a North Korean
northern China. If the Soviets were able to maintain attack would provoke an escalatory response there
their forward or defensive positions against China, the from the United States and perhaps the eventual
leadership probably would continue to give priority introduction of nuclear weapons into the conflict
consideration to t Western theater. Major Chinese worldwide. The Soviets probably would consider that
advances into Soviet territory during the early stages the risks attending direct military support of a North
of a European war, as the Soviets have simulated in Korean attack would far outweigh the possible benefits
exercises, would be likely to cause Moscow to send of tying up the US forces committed to defending
some reserves to Asia. South Korea.
8. We have little evidence of Soviet strategy in the
event of prolonged conflict with either NATO or Operations in the Pacific
China. Although the Soviets have sufficient resources
to fight major conventional battles in both theaters 11. The Soviet Pacific Fleet is a large force primar-
concurrently, they could hardly count on being able to ily made up of submarines, surface ships, and aircraft.
mount the massive offensive campaigns against the The submarine force consists of 106 submarines, of
various NATO theaters which we describe in chapter which 32 are ballistic missile and 78 cruise missile or
IV, while at the same time prosecuting a war aimed at torpedo attack units. The surface fleet is made up of
the defeat of China. We are unable to predict, how- 35 cruisers, destroyers, and Krivak-class missile frig-
ever, the circumstances in which the Soviets would ates in addition to numerous smaller combatants,
shift forces from one theater to the other during a Nearly all of the fleet is based either in Vladivostok or
prolonged two-front war. Petropavlovsk. Soviet naval airpower in the area in-
cludes about 175 strike, reconnaissance, and tanker
aircraft, about 65 fixed-wing and about 55 helicopter
Operations Against South Korea antisubmarine warfare (ASW) aircraft. Most aircraft
are based in the vicinity of Vladivostok, some strike
9. The Soviets probably would regard Korea as a aircraft are based farther north, and some reconnais-
potential problem during a NATO-Warsaw Pact war. sance and ASW aircraft are based in Petropavlovsk. A
Although they recognize that the South Koreans pose naval infantry force of about 6,000 men is based near
no direct threat to the USSR, they no doubt realize Vladivostok. (See tables B-4, B-5, and B-6 of annex B
that the US facilities and some forces in the Republic for a detailed order of battle of the Soviet Pacific
of Korea (South Korea) could be used to support a war Fleet.)
against them. Whether hostilities are initiated against
South Korea would be primarily a North Korean 12. The Pacific Fleet conducts routine operations
decision, although the Soviets could encourage the and the great majority of its training in the Sea of
North Koreans to attack the South. In any event, Japan, along the Kuril Islands, and off the Kamchatka
Moscow would probably provide logistic support to Peninsula. Except for Indian Ocean deployments and
North Korea if war broke out on the Korean Peninsula annual ASW exercises in the Philippine Sea, surface
in the hope that a major conventional war on the combatants do not normally operate in the open ocean
Korean Peninsula would pin down US forces there and areas of the Pacific. Intelligence collection patrols are
reduce the US ability to reinforce Europe or strike routinely maintained off some US naval facilities in
targets in the Soviet Far East. the Pacific and periodically conducted in the
A-2
T~Scet

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.