Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 25 …and subsidiary systems such as command and control, radioelectronic combat (REC), and reconnais- sance data link…
  • p. 31 …Some of these submarines might alternatively have missions of minelaying near NATO naval bases or patrolling…
  • p. 33 …The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against…
  • p. 42 …The USSR attributes a littoral of Europe have significant capabilities in either broad range of missions…
  • p. 51 …Improved models of the radio-controlled The SA-9 and ZSU-23-4 are probably with…
  • p. 55 …All Pact countries have well-organized mobili- direct control of the VGK to tactical-level missions…
  • p. 58 …These have pervasive control over the soldier's activities and commanders are expected to be closely…
  • p. 59 …Frontal Aviation missions include counterair, ground attack, Warsaw Pact Fixed-Wing Tactical Aircraft reconnaissance, electronic warfare…
  • p. 62 …Pilot Training and Proficienc. 3Y US stand- facilities, hardening command and control facilities, and establishing pipeline…
  • p. 66 …control system which is designed to provide the coordination necessary to conduct close-in missions when…
  • p. 68 major ground formations is used by tactical controllers conventional weapons or to have an operational weap…
  • p. 71 …countries, are tailored primarily for control of guished by missions: antiship strike, reconnaissance those two seas…
  • p. 75 …missions of the Warsaw Pact's general purpose naval forces are to exercise sea control 110…
  • p. 84 …this mission. The combat radii of Soviet ASM-equipped naval Capabilities for Exercising Sea Control in…
  • p. 85 …signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the second view are the Director, Defense…
  • p. 87 …the Soviets, Poles, and East Germans other missions. Most bombers would be required for have the…
  • p. 118 …would be detached from national control. Re- - The Western TVD. This theater would include, sidual forces…
  • p. 122 …and control functions is central to Soviet control and integration of Pact military operations. Such groups…
  • p. 134 …against HEAT ammunition, the Soviets have incorpo- control and combat support communication links. rated composite or…
  • p. 135 …The Air Operation have been ascertained from classified missions assigned to the NSWP forces are intended…
  • p. 141 …Pact air forces to perform their primary missions in poor flying weather. ould be the preferred…
  • p. 143 …Others believe that no judgment with flying combat missions at low altitudes or over long any…
  • p. 158 …The establishment of control of the Norwegian drastically the likelihood of a major, preemptive at- and…
  • p. 163 …aircraft carrier probably would be unable secondary mission of antiship attack. The Kiev prob- to cope…
  • p. 175 …be building a mand and control and electronic warfare missions. force capable of siniultaneously lifting much…
  • p. 176 …The Pact's early warning network is scheduled current roles of sea control in limited areas…
  • p. 178 …We do not know how the Soviets assess the achieving sea control and in providing support…
  • p. 182 …subma- to control Pact forces once they are released from rines with peripheral missions declines, some…
  • p. 186 …Soviet sea control capabilities gravity to require an early Soviet counteraction. The against US carrier and…
Top t
however, to be greater in areas closer to the Soviet purpose submarine output will increase to at least
homeland than in the open ocean. Although there are eight and possibly 10 units annually over the next few
gaps in our knowledge of Soviet ASW developments, years as newly identified construction programs pro-
we have no evidence of any major breakthrough that ceed and some ballistic missile units are converted to
would give the Soviets confidence in their ability to attack submarines.
neutralize Western submarines in the open ocean. 63. These new programs probably will include fol-
59. The Soviets are also committed to protecting low-ons to the C-II nuclear-powered guided-missile
their own submarines from NATO naval forces, par- submarine (SSGN), the V-II nuclear-powered attack
ticularly their D-class SSBNs operating in the Barents submarine (SSN), and possibly the A-class SSN. If
and Norwegian Seas and other areas. pressure hulls are fabricated from HY-130 equivalent
steel, the operational depth limit for the new SSNs
probably will be to as much as 470 meters, as com-
We expect the Soviets to continue working to improve pared with about 360 meters for present classes. If
their capabilities to support and protect their SSBNs. titanium hulls are used, the operational depth limit
could reach about 600 meters. According to one
60. Support for ground forces in the context of a intelligence estimate,' the maximum speeds for some
general European war will continue to be an impor- of the new SSN and SSGN classes could reach 37 knots.
tant mission of the Soviet Navy's general purpose Another view l holds that these submarines will be
forces. In addition to protecting the seaward flanks of capable of speeds of up to 33 knots. We believe the
the ground forces from attack by enemy sea-based air classes projected for the late 1970s or early 1980s will
or naval forces or by enemy amphibious assaults, the ntbesgicalyqeerhncuetsbmie.not be significantly quieter than current submarines.
Navy has the role of providing gunfire support for
ground forces and launching amphibious operations 64. Many operational diesel torpedo and cruise
against enemy flanks. This role will have some influ- missile units will be reaching the end of their useful
ence, albeit limited, on the future composition and age by about 1980. We believe the T-class diesel
force levels of the fleets. Some older units will be submarines will remain in production for several
retained and some new systems, including air-cushion years, gradually replacing the F-class in open-ocean
vehicles and hydrofoils, will be allocated to these flank operations.
support missions. 65. During the next decade we estimate that the
61. Soviet capabilities to interdict NATO's sea lines number of diesel submarines will decrease from about
of communication (SLOG) by attacking ships at sea 170 to about 85 as older units are replaced on a less
and by mining and airstrikes against European port than one-for-one basis; nuclear attack submarines will
facilities probably also will improve. This will result increase from 43 to about-75; nuclear cruise missile
from the increased capabilities that will likely exist in submarines will increase from 44 to about 55. Thus,
future Soviet general purpose submarines, mine war- the total number of general purpose submarines will
fare ships, and naval aircraft. Some agencies believe, decrease by about 15 percent-from 257 to about 215.
however, that Soviet capabilities to perform this mis- Because a greater proportion of the force will be
sion will nonetheless remain limited. Other agencies nuclear, however, there will be a significant increase
believe that Soviet capabilities for SLOC interdiction in overall capabilities.
currently are and will continue to be significant6C 66. Principal Surface Combatants. The Soviets
62. General Purpose Submarines. During the past currently have at least six construction programs under
few years, Soviet construction programs for torpedo way for principal surface combatants, including air-
attack and cruise missile submarines have produced an craft carriers. The principal surface combatants are
average of about five units per year, which is below expected to decrease in number over the next decade
estimated shipyard capacity. Because older subma- but to grow in firepower and in capability for pro-
rines have been retired at a greater rate than new ones longed deployment and combat. While most warships
have been produced, overall force levels have been produced in the USSR to date appear to be optimized
declining. We estimate, however, that overall general
This estimate was made by the Director, Defense Intelligence
For a discussion of differing views on Soviet intentions and Agency, and the Directorof Naval Intelligence, Department of the
capabilities to interdict NATO's sea lines of communications, see Navy.
paragraphs 142-149 of chapter if and 168 and 169 of chapter IV. . The holder of this view is the Central Intelligence Agency.
Vl-8
o ret

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.