Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 25 …and subsidiary systems such as command and control, radioelectronic combat (REC), and reconnais- sance data link…
  • p. 31 …Some of these submarines might alternatively have missions of minelaying near NATO naval bases or patrolling…
  • p. 33 …The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against…
  • p. 42 …The USSR attributes a littoral of Europe have significant capabilities in either broad range of missions…
  • p. 51 …Improved models of the radio-controlled The SA-9 and ZSU-23-4 are probably with…
  • p. 55 …All Pact countries have well-organized mobili- direct control of the VGK to tactical-level missions…
  • p. 58 …These have pervasive control over the soldier's activities and commanders are expected to be closely…
  • p. 59 …Frontal Aviation missions include counterair, ground attack, Warsaw Pact Fixed-Wing Tactical Aircraft reconnaissance, electronic warfare…
  • p. 62 …Pilot Training and Proficienc. 3Y US stand- facilities, hardening command and control facilities, and establishing pipeline…
  • p. 66 …control system which is designed to provide the coordination necessary to conduct close-in missions when…
  • p. 68 major ground formations is used by tactical controllers conventional weapons or to have an operational weap…
  • p. 71 …countries, are tailored primarily for control of guished by missions: antiship strike, reconnaissance those two seas…
  • p. 75 …missions of the Warsaw Pact's general purpose naval forces are to exercise sea control 110…
  • p. 84 …this mission. The combat radii of Soviet ASM-equipped naval Capabilities for Exercising Sea Control in…
  • p. 85 …signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the second view are the Director, Defense…
  • p. 87 …the Soviets, Poles, and East Germans other missions. Most bombers would be required for have the…
  • p. 118 …would be detached from national control. Re- - The Western TVD. This theater would include, sidual forces…
  • p. 122 …and control functions is central to Soviet control and integration of Pact military operations. Such groups…
  • p. 134 …against HEAT ammunition, the Soviets have incorpo- control and combat support communication links. rated composite or…
  • p. 135 …The Air Operation have been ascertained from classified missions assigned to the NSWP forces are intended…
  • p. 141 …Pact air forces to perform their primary missions in poor flying weather. ould be the preferred…
  • p. 143 …Others believe that no judgment with flying combat missions at low altitudes or over long any…
  • p. 158 …The establishment of control of the Norwegian drastically the likelihood of a major, preemptive at- and…
  • p. 163 …aircraft carrier probably would be unable secondary mission of antiship attack. The Kiev prob- to cope…
  • p. 175 …be building a mand and control and electronic warfare missions. force capable of siniultaneously lifting much…
  • p. 176 …The Pact's early warning network is scheduled current roles of sea control in limited areas…
  • p. 178 …We do not know how the Soviets assess the achieving sea control and in providing support…
  • p. 182 …subma- to control Pact forces once they are released from rines with peripheral missions declines, some…
  • p. 186 …Soviet sea control capabilities gravity to require an early Soviet counteraction. The against US carrier and…
attack at the outset of hostilities. In wartime the other gence evidence and other considerations which bear
submarines probably could monitor Western naval on this question include the following:
movements near major choke points and possibly near - We have no evidenceL
some of the main NATO naval bases, of plans to augment the surface force in the
139. By itself, however, the submarine force nor- Mediterranean during a period of tension before
mally deployed in the Mediterranean is not large the outbreak of hostilities
enough to attack all Western aircraft carriers and
other potential NATO naval targets there at one time.
Reinforcement from the Northern Fleet would take
almost two weeks for nuclear-powered submarines-
over three weeks for diesels-and provide NATO with
warning indications if conducted before war broke
out. Because of competing tasks elsewhere, limitations
on the availability of submarines, and logistical con-
straints, we estimate that the submarine formation in - Of some 60 principal surface combatants typi-
the Mediterranean probably would not be reinforced cally available in the Black Sea Fleet, seven to
before the outbreak of hostilities. nine are normally deployed to the Medi-
terranean.
140. There is evidence that Soviet submarines in
the Mediterranean would expend torpedoes only in - The Soviets have sortied major surface warships
self-defense or against high-value targets, especially from the Black Sea to augment the Mediterra-
aircraft carrier task groups, amphibious task groups, nean Squadron during major fleet exercises and
and US nuclear-powered submarines. Soviet subma- in times of crisis. Following the 1973 Arab-Israeli
rines, because of their lack of survivable replenish- war, for example, the Soviets almost doubled the
ment points, would probably not, as a matter of size of the Mediterranean force and demon-
course, fire their torpedoes against merchant ships in strated the capability to augment the force
the Mediterranean until they had succeeded in their quickly.
attacks on high-value targets or were returning to base. -Such an act would be a clear warning indicator,
141. Operations by Surface Ships in the Medi- and it could be counterproductive, depending on
terranean. Soviet surface forces normally in the Medi- NATO's reaction. On the other hand, it might be
terranean consist of seven to nine combatants and 25 viewed by the Soviets as a way to demonstrate
auxiliaries. These forces would conduct ASW oper- their resolve during a crisis.
ations and serve as target spotters and trackers for - The Soviets recognize NATO's capability to
strikes by submarines, aircraft, and other surface ships. block the Turkish Straits, and must consider that
They would also provide command and control sup- such operations could occur early in a war.
port for Soviet submarines and aircraft. Typically, the Consequently, Soviet planners could not count on
forces include one or two ships armed with cruise unobstructed passage to or from the Mediterra-
missiles. The remaining ships are armed with guns of nean after the oubreak of hostilities.
76-mm to 152-mm caliber and torpedoes. Many have
air defense missiles which can be used in an antiship 143. Some believe " that the Mediterranean Squad-
mode. In addition, all are equipped with a variety of ron probably would be augmented by at least a few,
ASW sensors and weapons. These ships almost cer- and possibly up to 12, of the large surface combatants
tainly would be operating in an environment in which in the Black Sea-such as Moskvas, Karas, Kyndas, and
NATO had air superiority, however, and, together Kashins-before the outbreak of hostilities. Others
with Soviet submarines, would be the targets for some believe ' that the Soviets wr"ld deploy no more than a
30 NATO submarines.
" The holders of this view are the Director, Defense Intelligence
142. There are divergent views within the Intelli- Agency; the Director, National Security Agency; and the Director
gence Community on whether or the extent to which of Naval Intelligence, Department of the Navy.
the Soviets would augment their surface forces in the 2 The holders of this view are the Central Intelligence Agency
Mediterranean during a period of tension preceding and the Director, Bureau of Intelligence and llesearch, Depart-
the outbreak of hostilities. All agree that the intelli- mnent of State.
IV-30
Th-et

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.