Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 25 …and subsidiary systems such as command and control, radioelectronic combat (REC), and reconnais- sance data link…
  • p. 31 …Some of these submarines might alternatively have missions of minelaying near NATO naval bases or patrolling…
  • p. 33 …The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against…
  • p. 42 …The USSR attributes a littoral of Europe have significant capabilities in either broad range of missions…
  • p. 51 …Improved models of the radio-controlled The SA-9 and ZSU-23-4 are probably with…
  • p. 55 …All Pact countries have well-organized mobili- direct control of the VGK to tactical-level missions…
  • p. 58 …These have pervasive control over the soldier's activities and commanders are expected to be closely…
  • p. 59 …Frontal Aviation missions include counterair, ground attack, Warsaw Pact Fixed-Wing Tactical Aircraft reconnaissance, electronic warfare…
  • p. 62 …Pilot Training and Proficienc. 3Y US stand- facilities, hardening command and control facilities, and establishing pipeline…
  • p. 66 …control system which is designed to provide the coordination necessary to conduct close-in missions when…
  • p. 68 major ground formations is used by tactical controllers conventional weapons or to have an operational weap…
  • p. 71 …countries, are tailored primarily for control of guished by missions: antiship strike, reconnaissance those two seas…
  • p. 75 …missions of the Warsaw Pact's general purpose naval forces are to exercise sea control 110…
  • p. 84 …this mission. The combat radii of Soviet ASM-equipped naval Capabilities for Exercising Sea Control in…
  • p. 85 …signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the second view are the Director, Defense…
  • p. 87 …the Soviets, Poles, and East Germans other missions. Most bombers would be required for have the…
  • p. 118 …would be detached from national control. Re- - The Western TVD. This theater would include, sidual forces…
  • p. 122 …and control functions is central to Soviet control and integration of Pact military operations. Such groups…
  • p. 134 …against HEAT ammunition, the Soviets have incorpo- control and combat support communication links. rated composite or…
  • p. 135 …The Air Operation have been ascertained from classified missions assigned to the NSWP forces are intended…
  • p. 141 …Pact air forces to perform their primary missions in poor flying weather. ould be the preferred…
  • p. 143 …Others believe that no judgment with flying combat missions at low altitudes or over long any…
  • p. 158 …The establishment of control of the Norwegian drastically the likelihood of a major, preemptive at- and…
  • p. 163 …aircraft carrier probably would be unable secondary mission of antiship attack. The Kiev prob- to cope…
  • p. 175 …be building a mand and control and electronic warfare missions. force capable of siniultaneously lifting much…
  • p. 176 …The Pact's early warning network is scheduled current roles of sea control in limited areas…
  • p. 178 …We do not know how the Soviets assess the achieving sea control and in providing support…
  • p. 182 …subma- to control Pact forces once they are released from rines with peripheral missions declines, some…
  • p. 186 …Soviet sea control capabilities gravity to require an early Soviet counteraction. The against US carrier and…
lop cret _ J
Naval Operations in the Baltic reinforced by the naval forces of East Germany and
Poland (see table IV-4), the Soviet Baltic Fleet Air
86. Warsaw Pact naval operations in the Baltic
woul be ondctedinhe cntex ofthe verl orce, Long Range Aviation, and elements of the
woctld natcondlctidinfthe codntactiofltheroforces
campaign in the Western Theater of Military Oper- Pact's national air defense and tactical air forces.
ations in Central Europe, and would conform with the 88. Antiship and Antisubmarine Warfare. A
timing and objectives of the Pact's ground and air main objective of the Pact's initial naval operations in
forces, in particular those of the Polish, or Northern, the Baltic would be to destroy NATO submarines, fast
Front of that TVD. 'This front, composed primarily of patrol boats, and mine warfare units because they
Polish forces, but with the support of the Combined could interfere with Pact ship movements, especially
Baltic Fleet, would be initially responsible for captur- west of Bornholm Island, and amphibious operations.
ing northern West Germany and Denmark. Pact planners recognize that the elimination of these
forces in the Baltic would be a difficult task.
87. The broad objectives of Pact naval operations into_qperational availability information reported to
would be to gain complete control of the Baltic Sea the Danes and West Germans probably would
and access to the North Sea to sever NATO's lines of have 23 diesel-powered submarines and 40 fast patrol
communication in the North Sea, and deprive NATO boats, 23 of the latter missile armed, after two to four
of potential launch areas for carrier strikes against Pact days of preparation. Obviously, it would be preferable
air and ground forces in the Central Region. (See for the Pact to destroy these ships at their bases, but a
figure IV-4.) Control of the Baltic Sea would also period of tension would provide time for them to
facilitate subsequent amphibious operations against deploy and disperse, requiring the Pact to locate and
Denmark and West Germany, act as a defensive destroy them at sea or in concealed anchorages. This
buffer for Pact territory, and defend Pact sea lines of would require effective coordination of all Pact forces,
communication from NATO attack. The major Pact V
forces involved would consist of the Soviet Baltic Fleet
Illustrative Warsaw Pact Naval and Amphibious Operations Figure IV-4
in the Western TVD
"Sea SWEDEN { 1
Nrhdenial f L
North operations Baltic
Sea N / Sea
i DEt ARS -
Sea denial Nb enh enBr mphibous. U.S.S.R
G G ,* i assaults
operations -ea/ a
Polish (Northern)
S'Front
A St rdam v Berlin Warsaw
NEHERLANPOLAND
EAST
Brussel WEST GERMANY
*
BELGIUM Bonn* GERMANY
LUXEMBOURG f Prague 0 200 kilometers
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
577639 1-79 CIA
TopIV-20 et

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.