Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 25 …and subsidiary systems such as command and control, radioelectronic combat (REC), and reconnais- sance data link…
  • p. 31 …Some of these submarines might alternatively have missions of minelaying near NATO naval bases or patrolling…
  • p. 33 …The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against…
  • p. 42 …The USSR attributes a littoral of Europe have significant capabilities in either broad range of missions…
  • p. 51 …Improved models of the radio-controlled The SA-9 and ZSU-23-4 are probably with…
  • p. 55 …All Pact countries have well-organized mobili- direct control of the VGK to tactical-level missions…
  • p. 58 …These have pervasive control over the soldier's activities and commanders are expected to be closely…
  • p. 59 …Frontal Aviation missions include counterair, ground attack, Warsaw Pact Fixed-Wing Tactical Aircraft reconnaissance, electronic warfare…
  • p. 62 …Pilot Training and Proficienc. 3Y US stand- facilities, hardening command and control facilities, and establishing pipeline…
  • p. 66 …control system which is designed to provide the coordination necessary to conduct close-in missions when…
  • p. 68 major ground formations is used by tactical controllers conventional weapons or to have an operational weap…
  • p. 71 …countries, are tailored primarily for control of guished by missions: antiship strike, reconnaissance those two seas…
  • p. 75 …missions of the Warsaw Pact's general purpose naval forces are to exercise sea control 110…
  • p. 84 …this mission. The combat radii of Soviet ASM-equipped naval Capabilities for Exercising Sea Control in…
  • p. 85 …signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the second view are the Director, Defense…
  • p. 87 …the Soviets, Poles, and East Germans other missions. Most bombers would be required for have the…
  • p. 118 …would be detached from national control. Re- - The Western TVD. This theater would include, sidual forces…
  • p. 122 …and control functions is central to Soviet control and integration of Pact military operations. Such groups…
  • p. 134 …against HEAT ammunition, the Soviets have incorpo- control and combat support communication links. rated composite or…
  • p. 135 …The Air Operation have been ascertained from classified missions assigned to the NSWP forces are intended…
  • p. 141 …Pact air forces to perform their primary missions in poor flying weather. ould be the preferred…
  • p. 143 …Others believe that no judgment with flying combat missions at low altitudes or over long any…
  • p. 158 …The establishment of control of the Norwegian drastically the likelihood of a major, preemptive at- and…
  • p. 163 …aircraft carrier probably would be unable secondary mission of antiship attack. The Kiev prob- to cope…
  • p. 175 …be building a mand and control and electronic warfare missions. force capable of siniultaneously lifting much…
  • p. 176 …The Pact's early warning network is scheduled current roles of sea control in limited areas…
  • p. 178 …We do not know how the Soviets assess the achieving sea control and in providing support…
  • p. 182 …subma- to control Pact forces once they are released from rines with peripheral missions declines, some…
  • p. 186 …Soviet sea control capabilities gravity to require an early Soviet counteraction. The against US carrier and…
Table IV-3
Illustrative Allocation of Pact Combat Aircraft for Initial Use in the Western
Theater of Military Operations
January 1979
Illustrative Deployment Postures
Forces Limited Full
in Place Reinforcement- Reinforcement b
Total Aircraft Available ..... ........................ 2,995 3,505 4,295
Of Which for:
Air Operationsd Including . ....................... 1,565 1,890 2,450
LRA ........ .............. ....................... 350 350 350
Tactical Com bat ............. ....................... 970 1,210 1,740
Tactical Reconnaissance/Electronic Warfare .... 245 330 360
Ground Support,d Including ........... ..... .... 300 385 515
Tactical Combat ................................ 240 305 425
Tactical Reconnaissance/Electronic Warfare 60 80 90
National Air Defense....... ...... .. ............. 775 775 775
Nuclear Rescrver Including ..... 355 455 555
L RA ........................ .... - 175 175 175
Tactical ................ ..... ...... ......... . 180 280 380
Includes aircraft in place plus the deployment forward of an East German wing (35 aircraft), one
Czechoslovak regiment (35 aircraft), seven Polish regiments (335 aircraft), and three Soviet fighter/light-
bomber regiments (.105 aircraft) from the USSR.
b Includes aircraft in "limited reinforcement" categri plus about-800 additional aifcraft fromnthe
USSR.
Normally only about 85 percent of these totals would be available for sustained operations.
d Allocation of tactical combat aircraft between ground forces support and the Air Operation is based
on a 20-80 split after nuclear alert forces are withheld, This allocation is based on documentary evidence.
Although we have no direct evidence, a 20-80 allocation between ground support and the Air Operation was
also applied to tactical reconnaissance and electronic warfare aircraft.
Allocation is based on national air defense subordination.
r A nuclear reserve in LRA of one-third of its forces is estimated from documentary evidence. The
number of tactical aircraft withheld in the "forces in place" option is based on exercise evidence, while each
of the reinforcement options assumes an additional allocation of 100 and 200 aircraft.
tactical aircraft based in the western USSR are East Germany from the Baltic Military District
not included in this illustrative posture.A of the USSR.
- Limited Reinforcement. Forces allocated to the - Full Reinforcement. Aircraft allocated to the
Air Operation in this posture-some 1,890 air- Air Operation in this posture would total about
craft-would include those described above and 2,450. They would include all those noted in the
an additional 220 NSWP aircraft belonging to "limited reinforcement" illustration and addi-
units which would be moved to within range of tional tactical aircraft that would be moved
NATO targets and about 105 aircraft moved into forward from the western USSR.
The Director, Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Assistant 49. The Pact probably has contingency plans for
Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Department of the Air Force, believe initiating the Air Operation from any of the postures
that, this illustrative posture notwithstanding, some tactical air- described above. Such plans probably involve various
craft based in the USSR-for example, SU-24 Fencers-could be
launched directly from their hione bases in an Air Operation. See schemes for timing the movement of additional air-
figures 11-13 and 11-14 of chapter II for detailed information on the craft to bases within striking range of NATO targets.
combat performance of Soviet tactical aircraft. For example, the Pact could undertake such move-
IV-13
T6--Sret --

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.