Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 25 …and subsidiary systems such as command and control, radioelectronic combat (REC), and reconnais- sance data link…
  • p. 31 …Some of these submarines might alternatively have missions of minelaying near NATO naval bases or patrolling…
  • p. 33 …The Soviet Union views control of its East Euro- preparerd for any mission, froni defending against…
  • p. 42 …The USSR attributes a littoral of Europe have significant capabilities in either broad range of missions…
  • p. 51 …Improved models of the radio-controlled The SA-9 and ZSU-23-4 are probably with…
  • p. 55 …All Pact countries have well-organized mobili- direct control of the VGK to tactical-level missions…
  • p. 58 …These have pervasive control over the soldier's activities and commanders are expected to be closely…
  • p. 59 …Frontal Aviation missions include counterair, ground attack, Warsaw Pact Fixed-Wing Tactical Aircraft reconnaissance, electronic warfare…
  • p. 62 …Pilot Training and Proficienc. 3Y US stand- facilities, hardening command and control facilities, and establishing pipeline…
  • p. 66 …control system which is designed to provide the coordination necessary to conduct close-in missions when…
  • p. 68 major ground formations is used by tactical controllers conventional weapons or to have an operational weap…
  • p. 71 …countries, are tailored primarily for control of guished by missions: antiship strike, reconnaissance those two seas…
  • p. 75 …missions of the Warsaw Pact's general purpose naval forces are to exercise sea control 110…
  • p. 84 …this mission. The combat radii of Soviet ASM-equipped naval Capabilities for Exercising Sea Control in…
  • p. 85 …signed missions; submarines would not neces-" The holders of the second view are the Director, Defense…
  • p. 87 …the Soviets, Poles, and East Germans other missions. Most bombers would be required for have the…
  • p. 118 …would be detached from national control. Re- - The Western TVD. This theater would include, sidual forces…
  • p. 122 …and control functions is central to Soviet control and integration of Pact military operations. Such groups…
  • p. 134 …against HEAT ammunition, the Soviets have incorpo- control and combat support communication links. rated composite or…
  • p. 135 …The Air Operation have been ascertained from classified missions assigned to the NSWP forces are intended…
  • p. 141 …Pact air forces to perform their primary missions in poor flying weather. ould be the preferred…
  • p. 143 …Others believe that no judgment with flying combat missions at low altitudes or over long any…
  • p. 158 …The establishment of control of the Norwegian drastically the likelihood of a major, preemptive at- and…
  • p. 163 …aircraft carrier probably would be unable secondary mission of antiship attack. The Kiev prob- to cope…
  • p. 175 …be building a mand and control and electronic warfare missions. force capable of siniultaneously lifting much…
  • p. 176 …The Pact's early warning network is scheduled current roles of sea control in limited areas…
  • p. 178 …We do not know how the Soviets assess the achieving sea control and in providing support…
  • p. 182 …subma- to control Pact forces once they are released from rines with peripheral missions declines, some…
  • p. 186 …Soviet sea control capabilities gravity to require an early Soviet counteraction. The against US carrier and…
Top e
CHAPTER III
WARSAW PACT COMMAND AND CONTROL
1. The Pact's success in achieving its wartime objec- A. The Wartime Command Structure
tives would depend on its ability to control and 4. The ultimate authority for the direction of the
coordinate multinational, joint-service operations of Soviet military rests with the Politburo of the Cornmu-
great complexity. individual member na- nist Party of the Soviet Union. The wartime role of the
tions have the command and control elements neces- Politburo is unclear, but its involvement as a group
sary to form the Pact's wartime control structure, C would probably be limited to only the most crucial
decisions. A subset of the Politburo, the Defense
Council, establishes military policy and makes funda-
mental decisions regarding the employment of mili-
tary forces. We believe that the Defense Council
would form the nucleus of a largely civilian national
2. In peacetime, the Warsaw Pact headduirters defense command organ. This body
does not control the armed forces of member states would consider all defense issues and provide broad
Each state controls its armed forces through its national guidelines for the conduct of military operations.
command authority, which is made up of key party,
government, and military leaders. (See figure 1II-1.) 5. Brezhnev, predesignated as Supreme Commander
Operational control of national forces is exercised by in Chief, would lead a Supreme High Command
each country's general staff. Overall Pact defense (Verkhovnoye Glavnokomandovaniye-VGK) drawn
planning is coordinated among Pact members, but the from elements of the Ministry of Defense. (See figure
process is clearly Soviet dominated. III-3.) This command would constitute the military-
strategic leadership over all Pact military operations
3. Establishment of the Pact wartime command against NATO. The VGK probably includes at least
system is not automatic. It entails authoritative release the three first deputy ministers of defense and the
of forces from national control and their subordination commanders in chief of the five components of the
to the Pact's high command.' Political and military Soviet armed forces. One of the Soviet first deputy
consultations between senior Pact leaders would be ministers of defense (currently, Marshal Kulikov) is
necessary to coordinate preparations for war. These the commander in chief of the combined armed forces
consultations could be made in person or by telephone. of the Warsaw Pact member states. The Soviet Gener-
There are telecommunication systems connecting East al Staff is the executive agent of the VGK and, as such,
European capitals and Moscow which can provide is the focal point for operational control of Soviet
Euroeancapi~lsandMoscw wichcatmproide armed forces and those of the Pact in wartime.
secure communications for telephone consultations.
East European and Soviet national command authori- 6. We believe that, should a war occur between the
ties also have special secure communications at their Warsaw Pact and NATO, theater commands (see
disposal. inset) would be established and exercise direct oper-
ational control over fronts and fleets and at least some
' For a detailed treatment of the alert and mobilization Proce- degree of control over those strategic assets allocated to
dures and the peacetime readiness and Pact forces, see NIE 4-1-78, support theater operations. The Soviets refer to these
Warsaw Pact Concepts and Capabilities for Coing to War in commands as High Commands of troops in a Theater
Europe: Implications for NATO Warning of War. -of War (TV) or Theater of Military Operations (TVD).
II-i

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.