Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 11 …Forces in the Moscow, volga, Ural, and Turkestan Military Districts could be used against NATO or…
  • p. 27 …initiate such use, although the possibility cannot be entirely excluded. DIA, NSA, Army, Navy, and Air…
  • p. 28 …DIA and Navy estimate that six to 10 reserve submarines could be brought to operational status…
  • p. 29 …CIA, State, NSA, and Navy estimate that the performance characteristics, deployment patterns, training programs, and exercise…
  • p. 30 …DIA, NSA, Army, Navy, and Air Force hold that the Soviets might choose to attack with…
  • p. 31 …Likelihood of Soviet Use of Nuclear Weapons at Sea Before Their Use on Land. Navy judges…
  • p. 56 Aviation (VTA) were used simultaneously, only one increasing amount of complex equiprnent entering the fully equipped…
  • p. 70 …but Aeroflot's 160 AN-12s could be used to lift heavy During peacetime, these Cubs…
  • p. 79 designed primarily for use against large-area targets, and speeds and maximum ranges of from 80…
  • p. 82 …The Pact navies must seek out Bear D aircraft. The Kiev can also receive targeting Western…
  • p. 84 …The Pact countries can concentrate ASW forces and use Pact navies maintain the bulk of their…
  • p. 85 …NATO placed on resources by the Soviet Navy's other mis- decision not to deploy carrier…
  • p. 87 …Thus the Pact would German Navies are capable of transporting less than probably commit few bombers…
  • p. 88 …As of 1975, however, weapons are also carried by many of the Soviet Navy's only…
  • p. 90 …that the expanded use of Frontal Aviation is regarded as only a partial solution to the…
  • p. 92 …submarines would be likely to be used to strike targets in NATO Europe, and the 150…
  • p. 96 …long-range bomber with the capability to strike US From Liepaja, G-II class submarines fitted…
  • p. 100 …the Directorof Naval Intelligence, Department of the Navy. The longer range and radius values in the…
  • p. 113 …Aboard ship the Soviets currently use a scheduled inspection 249. The Soviet Navy has the capability…
  • p. 114 …In addition, the Navy has the option of using merchant communications circuits for command and control…
  • p. 115 …In addition, the Soviet Navy could station an there, railroads and poor-quality highways extend to…
  • p. 122 …Some common computer programs are being used for logistics and battle management sup- 13. In wartime…
  • p. 145 Top Table IV-4 Warsaw Pact General Purpose Naval Forces Estimated To Be Available for Use…
  • p. 146 …German some extent by a shuttle using conventional landing Navies, plus mobilized merchant ships. Assault forces…
  • p. 147 …If the amphibious assaults sary to use far larger forces to escort convoys than were canceled…
  • p. 148 …Eastern Europe and the USSR by the US 6th sweeping NATO's mines or of successfully…
  • p. 152 …follow with strikes using air-to-surface missiles (ASMs),- The Bulgarian and Romanian Navies. Does not…
  • p. 154 …Many have air defense missiles which can be used in an antiship 143. Some believe " that…
  • p. 156 …Soviet Northern Fleet would be used to available LRA and Navy bombers. But we do not…
  • p. 158 …forces were optimized for maximum D-day impact, however, the Soviet Navy would give NATO early…
  • p. 159 …They probably Missile Cruisers 6 would attempt to use these submarines to intercept Cruisers ... 1 Missile…
  • p. 164 …mansk area can be covered by the long-range cruise missiles of the Soviet Navy's…
  • p. 165 …and conventionally armed area air defense against US and UK attacking aircraft missiles, thereby reducing the…
  • p. 168 …the Soviets would use aircraft mainly in battlefield strikes in close proximity to Pact forces, presumably…
  • p. 176 …This aircraft, which is optimized for short-haul Soviet Navy will produce a force with improved…
  • p. 177 …titanium hulls are used, the operational depth limit could reach about 600 meters. According to one…
  • p. 179 …Soviet Navy inventory of Polnoeny-class medium landing ships may also be planning to use the…
  • p. 180 …The Soviet Navy needs a long-range SAM mid-1980s. for defense beyond 20 nm, as…
  • p. 186 …Nonetheless, the would view the presence of US carriers operating in Soviets clearly regard the US…
  • p. 187 …The Soviet Navy maintains a small force in the to Middle Eastern oil were to become…
  • p. 188 …Cuban military contribution in support of Navy also uses port facilities in Benin and Angola but…
  • p. 200 …T s copy is for the iormation and use of the recipient and of persons under…
that the Soviets could have these 29 divisions available tion that, during an operation, large numbers of active
for combat in Central Europe in 14 days. units will be deployed forward from rear echelons as
227. Maintenance. Pact maintenance support in unit replacements. Individual equipment replacement
wartime would be heavily concentrated in front and will be limited principally to out-of-action situations
army units. Although maintenance units exist at divi- for divisional units.
sion and below, they are austere by Western standards 231. Personnel Replacement and War Reserves.
and divisions would be dependent on army and front As with equipment, some in the Intelligence Commu-
organizations for much of their maintenance support. nity believe that unit replacement represents the
Field maintenance units at front and army levels are preferred replacement system within the Warsaw Pact
capable of making extensive repairs. Soviet drivers, for combat personnel."0 Based on initial strength, Pact
especially those assigned to armored vehicles, receive estimates of daily casualty rates during a conventional
mechanical training and mobile repair teams are offensive operation are about 1 percent for the front,
available to frontline units. While these resources 0.6 to 1.2 percent for an army, 3 to 6 percent for
would enable combat units to make minor repairs in committed divisions, and 10 to 16 percent for
wartime, the concentration of maintenance support
above division level would require that most heavily regiments.
damaged equipment be evacuated to the rear for 232. An alternative view" holds that the Soviets
repair. would use both an individual and a unit replacement
system, depending on the situation. The- holders of this
228. The Soviets plan their maintenance require- view believe that the Soviets would implement an
ments in wartime according to their assumed combat individual replacement system to feed ongoing re,,
attrition rates. These rates are calculated on a daily placements into Warsaw Pact units to replace relatively
basis for an army engaged in a conventional offensive small, steady attrition-type losses that would result
in which a breakthrough is achieved. Thereafter, the primarily from the use of conventional weapons. Unit
attrition rates are expected to fall sharply. According replacement would be used to supplement this system
to classified Soviet writings, the daily rates for an army in situations where large sudden losses, caused primar-
are approximately as follows: ily-by nuclear weapons, occurred or in instances where
Artillery and missile launchers......... 2-3 percent the individual replacement system proved unable to
Tanks .............................. ............. 12-15 percent replace cum ulative losses.
Armored combat vehicles ................ 6-8 percent
Motor transport vehicles ................ 5-6 percent
229. Within these projected combat losses, the So-.
viets believe 40 to 50 percent would require light
repair, 20 to 25 percent medium repair, and 10 to 15
percent major repair; 20 to 25 percent would be total
losses. The Soviets plan to make only light repairs in
combat at unit levels below division. Division main-
tenance facilities would make both light and medium
repairs but the bulk of the medium repair work would
be accomplished at front-level repair facilities. Major
repair work would not be done in the field during 233. A pool of men and equipment which would be
combat but would probably be assigned to rear repair immediately available for replacement purposes is
facilities in the USSR. present in training units in the Groups of Forces. In
230. Thus, for a tank army in the GSFG with the GSFG, there are approximately 500 tanks and
approximately 1,300 medium tanks, the Soviets would 7,000 men in one motorized rifle and five tank
expect to lose some 700 tanks in the initial four days of
a breakthrough operation. Of this number, they would $0 The holders of this view are the Central Intelligence Agency;
expect about 370 tanks to be repaired and eventually the Director, Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Department of
restored to service. We. are unable to judge whether State; and the Director, National Security Agency.
these Soviet estimates reflect a realistic picture of Pact "The holders of this view are the Director, Defense Intelli-
maintenance capabilities. The Pact concept for replac- gence Agency, and the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence,
ing major items of equipment is based on the assump- Department of the Army.
1-67
Tdir-Secraet

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.