Documents / FOIA release

Warsaw Pact Forces opposite NATO, NIE 11-14-79, Volume II, the Estimate, CIA/NFAC, 31 January 1979

Central Intelligence Agency · 201 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume II of National Intelligence Estimate 11-14-79, Warsaw Pact Forces Opposite NATO, issued by the Director of Central Intelligence and dated January 1979. The National Foreign Intelligence Board concurred with it. It was the first comprehensive estimate of Pact forces facing NATO since 1971. It covers Pact doctrine, the ground, air, naval, nuclear and chemical forces, command and control, and campaign plans for war in Europe. It judges that Central Europe would be the decisive arena, and it lists Pact weaknesses in pilot training and antisubmarine warfare. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 11 …Forces in the Moscow, volga, Ural, and Turkestan Military Districts could be used against NATO or…
  • p. 27 …initiate such use, although the possibility cannot be entirely excluded. DIA, NSA, Army, Navy, and Air…
  • p. 28 …DIA and Navy estimate that six to 10 reserve submarines could be brought to operational status…
  • p. 29 …CIA, State, NSA, and Navy estimate that the performance characteristics, deployment patterns, training programs, and exercise…
  • p. 30 …DIA, NSA, Army, Navy, and Air Force hold that the Soviets might choose to attack with…
  • p. 31 …Likelihood of Soviet Use of Nuclear Weapons at Sea Before Their Use on Land. Navy judges…
  • p. 56 Aviation (VTA) were used simultaneously, only one increasing amount of complex equiprnent entering the fully equipped…
  • p. 70 …but Aeroflot's 160 AN-12s could be used to lift heavy During peacetime, these Cubs…
  • p. 79 designed primarily for use against large-area targets, and speeds and maximum ranges of from 80…
  • p. 82 …The Pact navies must seek out Bear D aircraft. The Kiev can also receive targeting Western…
  • p. 84 …The Pact countries can concentrate ASW forces and use Pact navies maintain the bulk of their…
  • p. 85 …NATO placed on resources by the Soviet Navy's other mis- decision not to deploy carrier…
  • p. 87 …Thus the Pact would German Navies are capable of transporting less than probably commit few bombers…
  • p. 88 …As of 1975, however, weapons are also carried by many of the Soviet Navy's only…
  • p. 90 …that the expanded use of Frontal Aviation is regarded as only a partial solution to the…
  • p. 92 …submarines would be likely to be used to strike targets in NATO Europe, and the 150…
  • p. 96 …long-range bomber with the capability to strike US From Liepaja, G-II class submarines fitted…
  • p. 100 …the Directorof Naval Intelligence, Department of the Navy. The longer range and radius values in the…
  • p. 113 …Aboard ship the Soviets currently use a scheduled inspection 249. The Soviet Navy has the capability…
  • p. 114 …In addition, the Navy has the option of using merchant communications circuits for command and control…
  • p. 115 …In addition, the Soviet Navy could station an there, railroads and poor-quality highways extend to…
  • p. 122 …Some common computer programs are being used for logistics and battle management sup- 13. In wartime…
  • p. 145 Top Table IV-4 Warsaw Pact General Purpose Naval Forces Estimated To Be Available for Use…
  • p. 146 …German some extent by a shuttle using conventional landing Navies, plus mobilized merchant ships. Assault forces…
  • p. 147 …If the amphibious assaults sary to use far larger forces to escort convoys than were canceled…
  • p. 148 …Eastern Europe and the USSR by the US 6th sweeping NATO's mines or of successfully…
  • p. 152 …follow with strikes using air-to-surface missiles (ASMs),- The Bulgarian and Romanian Navies. Does not…
  • p. 154 …Many have air defense missiles which can be used in an antiship 143. Some believe " that…
  • p. 156 …Soviet Northern Fleet would be used to available LRA and Navy bombers. But we do not…
  • p. 158 …forces were optimized for maximum D-day impact, however, the Soviet Navy would give NATO early…
  • p. 159 …They probably Missile Cruisers 6 would attempt to use these submarines to intercept Cruisers ... 1 Missile…
  • p. 164 …mansk area can be covered by the long-range cruise missiles of the Soviet Navy's…
  • p. 165 …and conventionally armed area air defense against US and UK attacking aircraft missiles, thereby reducing the…
  • p. 168 …the Soviets would use aircraft mainly in battlefield strikes in close proximity to Pact forces, presumably…
  • p. 176 …This aircraft, which is optimized for short-haul Soviet Navy will produce a force with improved…
  • p. 177 …titanium hulls are used, the operational depth limit could reach about 600 meters. According to one…
  • p. 179 …Soviet Navy inventory of Polnoeny-class medium landing ships may also be planning to use the…
  • p. 180 …The Soviet Navy needs a long-range SAM mid-1980s. for defense beyond 20 nm, as…
  • p. 186 …Nonetheless, the would view the presence of US carriers operating in Soviets clearly regard the US…
  • p. 187 …The Soviet Navy maintains a small force in the to Middle Eastern oil were to become…
  • p. 188 …Cuban military contribution in support of Navy also uses port facilities in Benin and Angola but…
  • p. 200 …T s copy is for the iormation and use of the recipient and of persons under…
Table II-16 NATO maintains a cohesive defense. Ammunition
expenditures would probably be greater than in a
Calculations of Warsaw Pact Ammunition Stocks successful Warsaw Pact attack, at least initially, and
Based on Depot Capacities could surge to 50,000 tons a day during periods of
January 1979 high-intensity combat or reach a daily average of
Ammunition 35,000 to 40,000 tons over a more prolonged period.
(rnetric tons) At this daily average rate of expenditure, and assum-
Czechoslovakia 420,000 ing no destruction of stocks, we calculate that there
East Germany ........ 435,000 would be sufficient ammunition in the Central Region
Poland 460,000 and the three western military districts of the USSR to
Total ...................................... 1,315,000 sustain Pact forces for 40 to 50 days. It should be noted
Baltic Military District .. 100,000 that this period could be lengthened considerably by
Belorussian Military District ....................... 140,000 drawing ammunition from the strategic reserve stocks
Carpathian Military District ....................... 115000 in the USSR, particularly those located west of the
Total 355,000 Urals. Portions of these stocks, which total approxi-
Hungary 220,000 mately 2.2 million tons, could be moved forward
Bulgaria 130,000 either in a buildup phase prior to the initiation of
Romania 300,000 hostilities or during a subsequent reinforcement phase
Total ........ ... .... 650,000 after hostilities had begun.
Opposite NATO Flanks a ... . ......... 810,000 216. POL. Our calculations of the levels of Pact
Strategic eserves b (West of Urals) . . 2,200,000 POL stocks for military use are less critical to judg-
a Includes stocks in the Leningrad, Odessa, Kiev, North Caucasus, ments of Pact sustainability than ammunition because
and Transcaucasus Military Districts the margin of supply over, requirements appears to be
b Includes stocks in the Moscow, Ural, and Volga Military greater than that for ammunition, and POL produc-
Districts.
,;Ec ... tion more closely approaches projected consumption.
In addition, the use of supplemental civilian POL
stocks would almost double available military supplies.
213. The Soviets estimate that a front would re- Calculated Pact POL stocks opposite Central Europe,
quire 120,000 to 150,000 metric tons of ammunition in based on an assumed 80 percent of estimated capacity,
a nonnuclear offensive operation lasting 12 to 15 are shown in table II-17.
days."a These amounts are intended to allow not only
for expenditures, but also for' reestablishing the -217. On the basis of Soviet POL consumption fac-
required reserves and replacing combat losses in prep- tors, we have calculated that five fronts opposite
aration for subsequent operations. In such a 12- to 15- Central Europe consisting of 87 divisions would con-
day operation, for example, ammunition requirements sume approximately 400,000 tons of POL in an offen-
for a three-front operation against NATO's Central sive operation lasting 12 to 15 days, well below the
Region would range from 360,000 to 450,000 tons. estimate of available supplies. Calculated POL stocks
214. Calculated ammunition stocks in the forward
area exceed the requirements for a single three-front
operation and thus would support subsequent oper- Calculations of Warsaw Pact POL Stocks Opposite
ations. The stocks in the three western military dis- Central Europe Based on Depot Capacities
tricts are probably sufficient to support the reinforcing January 1979
effort of two second-echelon fronts, consisting of as __- -
many as 29 divisions. Additional ammunition for POL
operations against NATO could be made available (netric tons)
from strategic reserves located west of the Ural Czechoslovakia ........... .................... 426,000
Mountains. East Germany ................. ....... .......... 555,000
Poland ... . . .............. ............ :..... 5 14,000
215. There is little information on W arsaw Pact Total . ... .................... ...... 1,495,000
ammunition estimates for a protracted conflict in Baltic, Belorussian, and Carpathian Military
w hich the Pact fails to m ake a breakthrough and Districts ..................-. ......................................... 2,200,000
All tonnages in this section are in metric tons.
11-64
Top ec rei

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 201 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.