Documents / FOIA release

CIA/CSI/ History Staff Monograph, The Central Intelligence Agency and Overhead Reconnaissance: The U-2 and Oxcart Programs, 16 July 2002.

Central Intelligence Agency · 406 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a CIA History Staff monograph by Gregory W. Pedlow and Donald E. Welzenbach, written in 1992 and approved for release in 2011. It covers the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program from 1954 to 1974 and its two aircraft, the U-2 and the A-12 OXCART. It follows their development, the overflights of the Soviet Union, the downing of Francis Gary Powers in 1960, and later operations. One section is titled "U-2s, UFOs, and Operation BLUE BOOK."

  • p. 22 …Bell was still being developed.'' Air Force headquarters soon approved Martin's proposal to mod- ify…
  • p. 55 CO5653421 UNCLASSIFIED E0129581.6(dlill>10<25Yrs ISI personnel divided among project headquarters, a US test…
  • p. 73 …On 3 August 1955, Dulles and Twining met at SAC headquarters in Omaha to sign the…
  • p. 74 …Speech given by Richard Bissell at CIA Headquarters, 12 October 1965 (TS Codeword). " Brig. Gen. Leo…
  • p. 102 …U-2 project officer, the Air Force Headquarters project officer, and NACA's top official, Dr…
  • p. 107 …did not have to report to higher headquarters. WRSP-1, known within the Agency as Detachment…
  • p. 117 …Late on the evening of 3 July, Bissell went to project headquarters in the Matomic Building…
  • p. 127 …The PARAMOUNT Committee worked inside PID headquarters in the Steuart Building. Composed of members from CIA…
  • p. 138 …and prom tly reported the conversation to headquarters. When details of close call reached Washington, James…
  • p. 153 …of Detachment A achieved excellent results, project headquarters had already decided that Western Europe was not…
  • p. 194 …Because the new government had not been briefed on the U-2, Project Headquarters refused to…
  • p. 205 …its own building to the new CIA Headquarters at Langley. Soon afterward, Col. Stanley W. Beerli…
  • p. 312 …that the performance of an A-12 with 175 engines (as suggested by project headquarters for…
  • p. 319 …12958 1.61111111>1010<25Yrs (Si Project Headquarters in Langley_planned and directed all operational BLACK…
  • p. 323 …Project headquarters informed Deputy Defense Secretary Vance on 10 January 1967 that the A- 12s would…
  • p. 324 …President Johnson con- firmed this decision on 21 May.'" - - Project headquarters selected 8 June 1968 as…
  • p. 334 …Air Force personnel served at all levels of the recon- naissance program, from project headquarters to…
  • p. 365 …Speech given by Richard Bissell at CIA Headquarters, 12 October 1965 (Top Secret Codeword). Interview with…
SecrefTSQRN
Chapter 6
285
005653421 UNCLASSIFIED
to reduce expenditures. After much refiguring, project officials de-
cided to decrease the number of deliverable aircraft. Amendment No.
11 to the contract reduced from 12 to 10 the number of A- 12s, for a
total cost of $161.2 million:7
The cancellation of these two A- 12s was offset by an Air Force
order for the development of a supersonic interceptor variant of the
A-12 to serve as a replacement for the North American F- 108A Rapier
interceptor project, which had been canceled in late 1960. With the
assistance of the the Air Force
entered into an agreement with Lockneed to proauce uiree AF-12 air-
craft, based on the A-12 design but modified to carry a second crew-
man and three air-to-air missiles. This effort was called Project
KEDLOCK. The AF-12 (later redesignated the YF-12A) was de-
signed to intercept enemy bombers long before they reached the
United States, and initial Air Force plans envisioned a force of up to
100 of these supersonic interceptors. In fact, only three of these planes
were built and delivered during the 1963-64 time frame because
Secretary of Defense McNamara canceled the program as a cost-cut-
ting measure. The Air Force bore all of the costs of the YF-I2A pro-
ject.; CIA was only involved in helping to write -black" contracts.4
Lockheed was not the only OXCART contractor having trouble
containing costs: Pratt & Whitney was fighting an even bigger battle.
In mid-I961, Pratt & Whitney overruns threatened to halt the entire
OXCART project. At the suggestion of Cdr. William Holcomb in the
office of the Chief of Naval Materiel, Richard Bissell asked the Navy
to assist in funding the 158's development. After hearing Bissell and
Holcomb's suggestion that the J58 might be used in future Navy air-
craft, VAdm. William A. Schoech, Chief of the Navy Materiel
Command that had originally financed the J58 engine, authorized the
transfer of $38 million in end-of-year funds to the project, thus keep-
ing the OXCART's head above water."9 As it turned out, the J58 was
never used in a Navy aircraft.
OSA History. chap. 20. pp. 46-47, 51-55 (TS Codewordi r OXCART Story.-
p. 10 (S).
OSA History, chap. 20, pp. 46-47 (TS Codeword).
Parangosky interview (S): OSA History. chap. 20. P. 55 (TS Codeword). During this
period, Kelly Johnson was very disappointed with Pratt & Whitney'i work on the 158,
particularly when they shocked him in September 1961 with the news that the engine
would be overweight. underpowered, and late. Johnson, "Archangel log," II September
1961.
ED 129581.6hili1l>1010<25Yrs
IS1
UNCLASSIFIED

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 406 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.