Documents / FOIA release

/specialCollection/SovietandWarsawPact/1961/1961-12-18.pdf

Central Intelligence Agency · 28 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency memorandum to the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated December 1961, sends a verbatim translation of a Soviet article from the TOP SECRET version of the journal Military Thought. The article, "The Theory of Military Art Needs Review" by Colonel-General A. Gastilovich, appeared in the first 1960 issue. It argues that nuclear missiles call for short "blitz" wars, smaller ground forces and missile troops as the main arm. It has no UFO content.

-20-
1111111S RET
••••
•
especially massive, organised according to territorial character-
let ice and trained without being pulled out of production. V.
have something similxr nov in the form of civilian formations of the
antiaircraft defews (*'V0). But these formetions exiat mostly
an payer, are not supported from. material-techmical standpoint,
are sani■valuntery organisations, and ars not properly directed by
anyone. In addition, organs of the WO are concerned with a very
large number of problems *Joh, in essence are the prerogatives of
governmental authority, such as communications, supplying the popu-
lation with iced, evacuation, etc.
It appears to us that such very important undertakings as medical
assistance to the suffering pcpulace and rehabilitative work., i.e.,
measures permitting the people to withstand enemy nuclear attack,
must be implemented by special troops. Their cadres and necessary
equipment must be maintained in peacetime and they must be assured
mobilisstionel buildup under the leaderstir of aliens of military
control with the initiation of military activities.
ions nomof Control. the standpoint of the nature of
control operations, the new forms of armed comflIct do not
introduce any basic changes. As in the past there will be need for
intelligence and collation of its informatice, an appraisal of the
sitnation, • decision and its transmittal to executors supervision
of execution, infloenCe on the course of events by, chaniing the
tasks of subordinate troops, or through the influence of the senior
commander's means smarted on the enemy, the Seaming of the commander
and of adjacent units. &waver, the methods of control and the means
by whinh they are implestented evanesce sienificant changes.
The method of direct persooal contact in operations is of little
value today. It can lead only to a mate of the senior commander's
time and yrcecte incorrect decisions based upon impressions of OW
center of combat operations. This method is admissible mow only in
combat an a subunit level, but not in operations.
The need to see the field of combat along the decisive direction
also has little admissibility now. This need arose from crushing
the eneny with masses of troops which were in direct content With his.
Ibis vill not usually happen, soy.
The met important thing in control is quick reaction to a change
in the situstion, • rapid to of control, and, consequently, the
veil-known need. for its mechanisatiou, automation, and reductien of

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 28 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.