Documents / FOIA release

/specialCollection/SovietandWarsawPact/1961/1961-12-18.pdf

Central Intelligence Agency · 28 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency memorandum to the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated December 1961, sends a verbatim translation of a Soviet article from the TOP SECRET version of the journal Military Thought. The article, "The Theory of Military Art Needs Review" by Colonel-General A. Gastilovich, appeared in the first 1960 issue. It argues that nuclear missiles call for short "blitz" wars, smaller ground forces and missile troops as the main arm. It has no UFO content.

  • p. 15 …Doreover, the inclinational each advancing large unit to lend assistance to its neighbor, to Wheel rapidly…
  • p. 16 …or positions with the aim of slowing the tempo of the enes7 advance along axes 'which…
  • p. 17 …Slowirmithe to of the advancing mairby mass at defense is based on cannterattacks and counterstrikes carried…
  • p. 21 …advancing reserves of the enemy. In this connection, however, it is inadvisable to distribute the WO…
  • p. 27 …arid terrain slowing the enemy advance. Defense in the flea analysis is decided by the maneuver…
ir connection with this it is necessary, evidently, to re-
examine our views on the nature of so-called counterpreparation
(kontrpodgotovka) in defense and on organisation of counterstrikes.
In these questions ye continue to proceed from the concept of the
solid and relatively stable front.
It appears to us that a limited quantity of nuclear weapons in
the defense will not permit • breakup of the enemy offensive with
one or two maesive nuclear strikes, especially since he will not
form compact groupings for his offensive. Axarently, instead of
counterpreparation, it will be necessary to restrict oneself to
daily and rapid annihilation of disclosed enemy amens of nuclear
attack and to individual (to the extent possible) nuclear strikes
at various times on the most dangerous of his tank divisions which
here broken through. If, however, the availability of nuclear
Weapons permits the delivery of a massive strike capable of breaking
up the enemy offensive ccmpletely„ then this is already not counter-
preparation but going over tc! the offensive.
I% is more expedient to carry out eounterstrikes in operational
defense, by means of meeting engagements, not with a convect grouping
especially created for this purpose and deployed on a definite line,
but with several divisions operating simultaneously, though from
different directions.
Anti-debarkatica defense along the coast by ground troops can
4150 have no defensive zones either on the cast or in the zone of
interior. In ports and in vulnerable landing sectors along the coast
there can be separate tank subunits andumits designated basically
for combat against airoosne landings and for initial repulsions of
debarkations of the enemy in landing-debarkation craft.
/he tests of anti-debarkation defense must be the maneuvering
activities of large units which move %worms the interior of coastal
zones andl in asetingengagements, pound the enemy utilizing nuclear
wmpons.
Of the now generally accepted mesa of anti-debarkation defense,
only the ecnstruction at obstacles, both in the wetC7 as well as on
the land, can achieve much sigrifloanee.
Sway amphibious leullog operetices, while =roots at ea, do
not it expensi.e and cumbersome operations ageinst them by the
navy andldngsange aviation. The basis of their annihilation can
45-
IlIksEdgq.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 28 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.