Documents / FOIA release

/specialCollection/MissileGap/1961/1961-04-25.pdf

Central Intelligence Agency · 101 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is National Intelligence Estimate 11-5-61, Soviet Technical Capabilities in Guided Missiles and Space Vehicles. It was submitted by the Director of Central Intelligence and concurred in by the United States Intelligence Board on 25 April 1961. The estimate assesses Soviet surface-to-air, antimissile, air-to-air, air-to-surface, ballistic, ICBM, naval and space programs. It concludes that the first Soviet ICBM unit was probably operational around 1 January 1960. It also says there is no evidence the Soviets are developing offensive space weapons. It contains no UFO material.

  • p. 79 …The first attempt to launch a Venus probe succeeded in orbiting the earth satellite, Sputnik VII…
  • p. 81 …Unmanned Earth Satellites. Earth satellite vehicles offer significant advances over conventional techniques for acquiring information on…
  • p. 83 …Unmanned Earth Orbiting Flight: 15,000-20,000 pounds, low orbit Military satellites Communications Weather surveillance…
C00278407
30
struct ion of launch sites in northwestern
USSR in 1957-1959 are sufficient to support
an estimate that as of about 1 January 1960,
the first operational Soviet ICBM unit was
trained and equipped with a few missiles and
launchers. This is referred to as IOC date.
We believe that since that time, the USSR has
had at least some capability to launch ICBMs
with good accuracy and reliability against
targets in the US.IG IG
130. Beyond this point, however, any estimate
of Soviet operational ICBM strength is e ri ti-
ca ly dependent upon interpretation of ele-
ments in the evidence which permit differing
judgments. The question of the probable
magnitude of current and future Soviet op-
erational ICBM strength will be examined in
the forthcoming NIE 11-8-61, "Soviet Capa-
bilities for Long Range Attack."
Follow-on ICBM Development
131. As we have indicated, the current ICBM
is already reasonably accurate and reliable,
rugged, and capable of delivering high-yield
'The Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, De-
partment of the Army, believes that by early 1960,
the Soviets had developed a 5,000 n.m. missile satis-
factory for emergency deployment to interim ICBM
launch facilities and that a few missiles possibly
were deployed to such facilities. He believes that
an IOC with fully developed, deployed, operational
missile launch facilities did not occur in 1960.
"The Assistant Chief of Naval Operations (Intel-
ligence), Department of the Navy, believes the So-
viets probably had an emergency capability to
launch a few missiles from test facilities (as opposed
to operational launch sites) starting early in 1960.
Factors which bear against a deployed operational
ICBM capability and which are mentioned in the
estimate weigh heavil y in his judgment. These in-
clude4
the lack of ICBM troop training activity, and
the lac of firm, evidence on operational ICBM sites.
In addition, the first appearance of what appears to
be an operational type site at Area C at Tyuratam
which was estimated to be completed in late 1960
or early 1961 leads him to judge that operational
launch sites were not available before that time.
warheads against targets anywhere in the US.
It will probably continue to be modified and its
performance characteristics Unproved over the
next few years. Decoys and nosecones with
reduced radar reflectivity may be developed
for it. Somewhat greater flexibility will prob-
ably be achieved in the deployment concept,
and much effort will be directed towards per-
fecting the logistic support, maintenance, and
communications facilities necessary to the
most effective employment of an ICBM force.
But the present ICBM is extremely bulky and
must be fairly (i nf.:i l lt cri handle, it has the
relatively slow reaction time of a very large
nonstorable liquid-fueled system with the at-
tendant problem of holding the missile for
periods of time, and it does not readily lend
itself to deployment in hardened sites.
132. It is probable, therefore, that the Soviets
would find it desirable to develop a new ICBM
system which would incorporate some of the
improvements mentioned above and would
overcome disadvantages inherent in the pres-
ent system. For example, while we do not
exclude the possibility that the present sys-
tem could be adapted to use missiles with
storable liquid propellants, the better course
for the USSR would almost certainly be to
develop a new system using either storable
liquid or solid fuels, and to ' build into it other
elements compatible with such fuels. Greater
flexibility and less vulnerability in deployment
would be desirable characteristics for a follow-
on ICBM system, even though rail service will
probably continue to be an essential element
in the preferred Soviet deployment concept.
133. A follow-on ICBM system may already
be under development without our knowledge.
We would expect. detectable flight tests to
begin some 18 months to two years prior to
first operational availability. Such tests could
begin at any time, and we therefore believe
that a follow-on ICBM system could become
operational in about 1963 or after.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 101 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.