Documents / FOIA release

/specialCollection/MissileGap/1992/1992-04-01.pdf

Central Intelligence Agency · 406 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a CIA History Staff monograph by Gregory W. Pedlow and Donald E. Welzenbach, published in Washington in 1992 and approved for release in 2011. It covers the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program from 1954 to 1974, which developed and flew the U-2 and the A-12 OXCART. It traces the U-2's development, the overflights of the Soviet Union, the downing of Francis Gary Powers on 1 May 1960, and later operations. One section is titled U-2s, UFOs, and Operation BLUE BOOK.

  • p. 114 …Led by Air Force Chief of Staff Nathan F. Twining, the delegation would be in the…
  • p. 364 …Twining, Nathan F. Neither Liberty nor Safety. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966. United States Air…
CO5653421 UNCLASSIFIED
Chapter 2
76
(0129581.13[111[1]>10<25Yrs
[S]
and could not survive the stresses of loops and barrel rolls. Moreover,
the original U-2s were placarded, which meant that they could not be
flown at sea level faster than 190 knots in smooth air or 150 knots in
rough air. At operational altitude, where the air was much less dense,
they could not exceed Mach 0.8 (394 knots). Speeds in excess of
these limits could cause the wings or tail section to fall off.
Airspeed was a very critical factor for the U-2. At maximum alti-
tude only 6 knots separated the speeds at which low-speed stall and
hi g h-speed buffet occurred. Pilots called this narrow range of accept-
able airspeeds at maximum altitude the "coffin corner" because at
this point the U-2 was always on the brink of falling out of the sky. If
the aircraft slowed beyond the low-speed stall limit, it would lose lift
and begin to fall, causing stresses that would tear the win g s and tail
off. A little too much speed would lead to buffeting, which would
also cause the loss of the wings or tail. Flying conditions such as
these required a U-2 pilot's full attention when he was not usin g the
autopilot. Airspeed was such a critical factor that Kelly Johnson
added a vernier adjustment to the throttle to allow the pilot to make
minute alterations to the fuel supply.'4
Amon g the unique devices developed for the U-2 was a small
sextant for making celestial "fixes" during the long overflights.
Because cloud cover often prevented U-2 pilots from locatin g navi g a-
tional points on the earth through the periscope, the sextant turned out
to be the pilots' principal navigational instrument during the first
three years of deployment. When clouds were not a factor, however.
the periscope proved highly accurate for navigation. During the final
tests before the aircraft became operational. U-2 pilots found they
could navigate by dead reckoning with an error of less than 1 nautical
mile over a 1,000-nm course."
FINAL TESTS OF THE U-2
Flight-testing of the U-2 continued throughout the fall and winter of
1955-56 in order to test all the various systems. By mid-January
1956. SAC officials were so impressed that they also wanted to pur-
chase a fleet of these planes. On 30 January. DCI Dulles agreed to
" Cunningham interview (TS Codeword): John Parangosky. interview by Donald E.
Welzenbach. tape recording. 6 March 1986 (S): inrormation supplied by
o Donald E. Welzenbach (S).
" Cunningham interview (TS Codeword).
UNCLASSIFIED

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 406 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.