Documents / FOIA release

/specialCollection/MissileGap/1992/1992-04-01.pdf

Central Intelligence Agency · 406 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a CIA History Staff monograph by Gregory W. Pedlow and Donald E. Welzenbach, published in Washington in 1992 and approved for release in 2011. It covers the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program from 1954 to 1974, which developed and flew the U-2 and the A-12 OXCART. It traces the U-2's development, the overflights of the Soviet Union, the downing of Francis Gary Powers on 1 May 1960, and later operations. One section is titled U-2s, UFOs, and Operation BLUE BOOK.

  • p. 13 …Without their help a good deal of this story could never have become known. The assistance…
  • p. 44 …the CL-282; in fact, there may never have been a formal decision as such. In…
  • p. 74 …fly, Lockheed engineers had to solve problems never before encountered. Among these problems was the need…
  • p. 84 …Flight tests continued, with the U-2 ascending to alti- tudes never before attained in sustained…
  • p. 102 …put aside for further thought (which it never received), and Bissell's weather research cover re…
  • p. 138 …Then in January 1960, the commander of Detachment B, raised an important question that had never…
  • p. 147 …Peninsula, because of bad weather and, therefore, never entered Soviet airspace. A second attempt to photograph…
  • p. 159 …Six of the men on board were killed and the remaining 11 were never heard from…
  • p. 160 …Although this new Berlin crisis never became as threatening as the blockade of 1948-49, President…
  • p. 165 …The Air Force never equipped its orig- inal U-2s with the J75 engines." Detachment C…
  • p. 189 …Powers never made it past Sverdlovsk. Four and a half hours into the mission, an SA…
  • p. 208 …very good reason, and such a situation never developed, in part because satellite photography gradually began…
  • p. 210 …Since this never happened, Francis Gary Powers' flight on I May 1960 proved to be the…
  • p. 223 …Responsibility for photo- graphic coverage of Cuba remained with the Air Force; Agency pilots never flew…
  • p. 264 Sratrt.11/Qt2.1....31■1 Chapter 5 251 005653421 UNCLASSIFIED There was never another Agency…
  • p. 290 …the OXCART aircraft for its own use. never adopted the laminated vertical stabilizers.'4 THE OXCART…
  • p. 294 …Scott employed concepts never be- fore used in camera systems. These included the use of a…
  • p. 298 …As it turned out, the J58 was never used in a Navy aircraft. OSA History. chap…
  • p. 299 …This new delay was caused by leaking fuel tanks, a problem that would never be solved…
  • p. 313 …even though the SKYLARK contingency plan was never put into effect. Since U-2s continued to…
  • p. 316 …Moreover, the Soviets never operated the radars in the tracking and locktin modes, a fact that…
  • p. 326 …collector of strategic intelligence, the OXCART was never used for this purpose. Its brief deployment was…
  • p. 328 …Yet, the President never went so far as to eliminate the overflight program. As Commander in…
  • p. 333 …its speed and altitude have never been equaled. The development of this aircraft also led to…
005653421 UNCLASSIFIED
"'Strere4.111QESQ1
Chapter 3
109
SOVIET PROTEST NOTE
The 4 and 5 July overflights brought a strong protest from the Soviet
Union on 10 July in the form of a note handed to the US Embassy in
Moscow. The note said that the overflights had been made by a
"twin-engine medium bomber of the United States Air Force" and
gave details of the routes flown by the first two missions. The note
did not mention Moscow or Leningrad, however, because the Soviets
had not been able to track these portions of the overflights. The
Soviet note stated that the flights could only be evaluated as "inten-
tional and conducted for the purposes of intelligence." As soon as the
note arrived at the White House on the evening of 10 July 1956,
Colonel Goodpaster called Bissell and told him to stop all U-2 over-
flights until further notice. The next morning Goodpaster met with
Bissell to review the U-2 situation. Bissell said three additional flights
had taken place since the missions mentioned in the Soviet note but
added that no more were planned.35
- Later Eisenhower told Goodpaster that he "didn't like a thing"
about the Soviet note and was going to discuss the matter with
Secretary of State Dulles. With the strong approval of President
Eisenhower, Goodpaster informed DCI Dulles that "there is to be no
mention of the existence of this project or of operations incident to it,
outside the Executive Branch, and no mention within the Executive
Branch to others than those who directly need to know of the opera-
tion, as distinguished from output deriving from it."36
During these initial overflights, the U-2 flew above 69,000 feet
and could be seen only fleetingly by pilots of the Soviet interceptor
aircraft. Thus, it appears that the Soviet claim that the intruder was a
twin-engine bomber was probably based on the assumption that this
was another overflight by a reconnaissance version of the twin-engine
Canberra bomber, similar to the RAF overflight of Kapustin Yar in
1953. The US reply, sent to the Soviets on 19 July, truthfully denied
that any US "military planes" had overflown the Soviet Union on the
days in question. Meanwhile, on 16 July the Polish Ambassador to
" "Alleged Violations of Soviet Territory: Soviet Note of July 10, 1956 with U.S. Reply,"
US Department of State Bulletin. 30 July 1956, pp. 191-192: Andrew J. Goodpaster.
Memorandum for the Record, 11 July 1956, WHOSS, Alpha, DDEL (TS).
" Andrew J. Goodpaster. Memorandum for the Record, 11 July 1956. WHOSS, Alpha,
DDEL (TS).
Set
UNCLASSIFIED

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 406 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.