Documents / FOIA release
This CIA Oral History Program transcript records former Director of Central Intelligence Richard Helms interviewed by R. Jack Smith on 21 April 1982, approved for release in March 2008. Helms disputes criticism in the Rockefeller Commission Report and discusses the Oxcart aircraft, Watergate and the Plumbers, the war in Laos, and allegations about National Estimates. He also recalls warning President Johnson before the 1968 Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia and passing on warnings of the 1973 Yom Kippur war. It contains no UFO material.
“Anderson”1 page
s h y / / 2 03 008 09 N R H : Well, you know, it was a great aircraft. And I just would not like to have those flights over North Vietnam, the speed in which they were made, the excellence of the photography - all the rest of the stuff, to just get lost. . . . . ? I l ( : I l . . (U/F madebyto ntelligence is the extraordinary ideas and technical achievements that have come out of the Agency. Really has been absolutely first class. And even though I realize as it’s the conscious policy to say that it’s the Intelligence Community and give all due credit to the Defense Department because they have been putting up the money and so forth. The fact remains that all the ideas came from the Agency or from various people in the Agency. Not one sillgle fellow, just several people responsible for these things. Well, I think it’s absolutely extraordinary how good it was over the years and somewhere in the . historical record out there that point should be pretty clearly made. So that as we go to our Maker,and other generations have a good look at what went on, that the credit doesn’t suddenly get shifted to a bunch of people at the Pentagon that couldn’t have done it if they’d had to. 0)Because I truly believe that one of the great contributionsthat the CIA, over the years, has (U) JS: Right. started, during the Helms administration when [Deputy Director for Scienceand Technology] Les Dirks came up with this idea that maybe this kind of a thing could be worked out with the use of, well I don’t know what the technical terms are anymore, it’s been so long since I’ve discussed them with anyone. b)RH:Yes. That was the basic thrust of it, but in order to achieve this we were going to have to demonstrate that you could actually use some kind of chips that they had in mind to perform this function. And it was a way-out scheme at the time, there was no doubt about it. And I remember vividly, the sessions I had with Dave Packard, who was then Deputy Secretary of Defense, as you also remember he was also Chairman of NRO [National Reconnaissance Office] in those days and also the fellow that had the money in the Pentagon. So he was the one that really helped to get the seed money to get this thing started. Because with his background in electronics in Hewlett-Packard and having spent his life in this general area, although he was no expert on this particular thing, at least he knew the state of the art and so forth; he’d made the personal calculation that maybe it was do-able and if it was do-able it was certainly worth doing. So he was the one who provided the support and the seed money to get this whole thing rolling. And so it was really rolling by the time I left. 1remember that was just the last thing I OK’d in connection with the project was setting up this, whatever they called the i n s t a l l a t i o n n 7 1 And after that I left the Agency, so obviously had been perfected and so forth. And I can only assume there’s been a great success. Because you know you can’t avoid getting that impression. I simply wanted to give that little bit of history as to why it was r l f i n a l l y came on-stream because various people tried to kill it over time as being way out. S RET//20300809 \
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 15 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.