Documents / FOIA release

Re: Declaration in Bryant V CIA

Central Intelligence Agency · 2010-01-15 · 58 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency filing is a declaration by Delores M. Nelson, the CIA's Information and Privacy Coordinator, in Bryant v. CIA, Civil Action No. 09-0940 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It supports the CIA's motion for summary judgment. It traces Larry W. Bryant's 2008 FOIA request for records of a 1987 FAA meeting on the November 17, 1986 Japanese 747 encounter over Alaska and records of similar airborne UFO encounters. It also describes the fee dispute and the searches the CIA ran. No records of the meeting were found, and three documents from other agencies were referred to them.

  • p. 5 …for and review of all Agency files on UFOs. The letter also enclosed a copy of…
  • p. 14 …search for and reviewed all CIA files relating to UFOs. This effort, conducted under the direction…
  • p. 27 …Woolsey ordered another review of all Agency files on UFOs. Using CIA records compiled From that…
  • p. 32 …reference file of the activities of the Air Force and other agencies on UFOs. Neither the…
  • p. 33 …central file on the subject of UFOs. CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs in…
  • p. 35 …in 1958, Major Kcyhoe charged that the Agency was deliber- ately asking eyewitnesses of UFOs not…
  • p. 37 …to UFOs.“ a Spaulding was convinced that the Agency was withholding major files on UFOs. Agency…
  • p. 38 …They even turned up an old UFO file under a secretary's desk. The search finally…
  • p. 39 …9 April I947. _ Jacobs, The UFO Canmavmy, p. 156 and Quintanilla, "The investigation of UFOs,’ p…
  • p. 43 …Patrick-l-iuyghe. “UFO Files: The Untold Story.” The New Yarlr Timer Magazine, 14 October 1979…
Approved for Release: 2025/06/11 C07083374 .
and correct copy of CIA’s September 30, 2008 letter and enclosures is attached
hereto as Exhibit B.)
8. By letter dated October 3, 20084, Plaintiff appealed the CIA’s decision “to deny
my FOIA request status as a representative of the news media” regardin request
F-2008-01781. Plaintiff went on to state “[b]y this appeal, I hereby characterize
my records-search-fee-waiver.‘request’ as a DEMAND” and cited 5 U.S.C. § 522
“a(4)(A)(ii)(II), namely, ‘fees shall be limited to reasonable standard charges for
document duplication when...the request is made by...a representative of the news
media.”’ (A true and correct copy of Plaintiffs appeal request is attached hereto
as Exhibit C.)
9. By letter dated October 28, 2008, the CIA acknowledged Plaintiffs letter in
which he appealed our determination to deny him “status as a representative of
the news media” and to deny his “request for a fee waiver.”
10. The CIA explained to Plaintiff that since records responsive to his FOIA request
had been previously released and no additional searches were conducted, he
would be responsible “for copying costs associated with this request regardless of
fee category determination.” That is, the copying fees would apply even if he
were placed into the news media fee category. With respect to his appeal of the
denial of a fee waiver, the CIA reiterated that “if processing has been initiated, the
requester must agree to be responsible for costs in the event of an adverse
4 The “letter” composed as email on October 3, 2008, is actually dated “6 Oct 2008” in a
handwritten annotation next to Plaintiffs signature. The text states in part: “By snail-
mail, I’m sending to you a signed printout of this e-fonnatted letter.” The appeal was
received in my office on October 14, 2008 (see date stamp).
5
Approved for Release: 2025/06/11 C07083374

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 58 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.