Documents / FOIA release

Re: Declaration in Bryant V CIA

Central Intelligence Agency · 2010-01-15 · 58 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency filing is a declaration by Delores M. Nelson, the CIA's Information and Privacy Coordinator, in Bryant v. CIA, Civil Action No. 09-0940 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It supports the CIA's motion for summary judgment. It traces Larry W. Bryant's 2008 FOIA request for records of a 1987 FAA meeting on the November 17, 1986 Japanese 747 encounter over Alaska and records of similar airborne UFO encounters. It also describes the fee dispute and the searches the CIA ran. No records of the meeting were found, and three documents from other agencies were referred to them.

  • p. 5 …for and review of all Agency files on UFOs. The letter also enclosed a copy of…
  • p. 14 …search for and reviewed all CIA files relating to UFOs. This effort, conducted under the direction…
  • p. 27 …Woolsey ordered another review of all Agency files on UFOs. Using CIA records compiled From that…
  • p. 32 …reference file of the activities of the Air Force and other agencies on UFOs. Neither the…
  • p. 33 …central file on the subject of UFOs. CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs in…
  • p. 35 …in 1958, Major Kcyhoe charged that the Agency was deliber- ately asking eyewitnesses of UFOs not…
  • p. 37 …to UFOs.“ a Spaulding was convinced that the Agency was withholding major files on UFOs. Agency…
  • p. 38 …They even turned up an old UFO file under a secretary's desk. The search finally…
  • p. 39 …9 April I947. _ Jacobs, The UFO Canmavmy, p. 156 and Quintanilla, "The investigation of UFOs,’ p…
  • p. 43 …Patrick-l-iuyghe. “UFO Files: The Untold Story.” The New Yarlr Timer Magazine, 14 October 1979…
Approved for Release: 2025/06/11 C07083374
Declassification Review programs in the CLA. These responsibilities include
directing searches of CIA records systems pursuant to public requests for records
under these programs and coordinating the reviews of any records retrieved in
such searches. These review processes include undertaking any intra-agency and
inter-agency coordination and referrals necessary in light of the information found
in responsive records. In addition, my responsibilities include fee category and
fee waiver determinations.
4. As part of my official duties I ensure that the CIA administratively processes
F OIA and Privacy Act requests including the search, retrieval, analysis, review,
redaction and release of documents in accordance with the law and as efficiently
as possible with the persormel and resources available.
5. Through the exercise of my official duties, I have become familiar with Plaintiffs
F OIA request for information that is the subject of this civil action. I make the
following statements based upon my personal knowledge, and information made
available to me in the course of performing my official duties.
I. PLAINTIFF’S FOIA REQUEST AND THE CIA’s RESPONSE
6. By “letter”l dated August 23, 2008 (received in the office of the Information and
Privacy Coordinator on August 28, 2008), Plaintiff submitted a FOIA request to
the CIA for the following “CIA-received and CIA-generated” records:
I
The “letter” is actually a print-out of email correspondence between the Office of the
Director of National hitelligence and Plaintiff with handwritten annotations addressed to
“Scott Koch [former CIA Information and Privacy Coordinator], changing date to “23”
August, and containing signature of Plaintiff. The text states in part “By snail- mail, I’m
sending to you a signed printout of this e-formatted letter.”
l
E
Y
I
2 I
Approved for Release: 2025/06/11 C07083374

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 58 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.