Documents / FOIA release
This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.
“Anderson”1 page
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 6 Billion Rubles Subsidies on Agricultural Products Sold to the Light and Food Industries Year Light Industry Food Industry 1966 0.3 3.3 Table 7 Profits as a Percent of Productive Fixed and Working Capital in 1972 19.3 10.2 26.0 Industry Electric power Oil extraction 1967 0.3 5.0 Oil refining 21.8 1968 0.3 7.3 1969 0.3 8.2 1970 1.7 13.0 Gas Goal Ferrous metals 46.0 6.3 16.0 1971 1.8 14.1 Chemicals 19.8 1972 2.0 15.2 Machinery 20.2 1973 0.6 15.8 Wood, pulp, and paper 17.7 1974 0.2 17.3 Construction materials 11.8 1975 0.5 19.0 Source: Vladimir G. Treml, Agricultural Subsidies in the Soviet Union, US Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1978, p. 9. order to stimulate production and improve the quality of the Soviet diet. At the same time, the government has held retail prices constant. Therefore, it has had to subsidize the light and food industries increasingly to cover their higher costs. The agricultural subsidy has grown rapidly and now amounts to more than 20 billion rubles per year. Selected data relating to the light and food industries make it clear that the food industry receives most of the subsidy (table 6). The price distortions resulting from the combined effects of turnover taxes and subsidies are most striking at a disaggregated level. Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other food branches in 1972, while subsidies represented a negative 48 and 22 percent of the gross outputs of the meat and dairy sectors. Thus the subsidies tend to reinforce rather than offset price distortions caused by turnover taxes. Variations in Profit Rates Profits of a khozraschet enterprise~as noted earli- er—are not intended to serve the same purpose as profits in a Western business. Instead, they are a mechanism to obtain sufficient funds for centralized public expenditures, to provide material incentives to 27.0 24.5 5.5 59.3 12.7 12.2 31.5 13.9 Light industry Food industry Sugar Meat Transportation River transport Automobile transport Communications Source: Narkhoz I 975, pp. 728-29. enterprise management, to measure performance of enterprise management, and to exercise fiscal and administrative control. _ After the management reforms of 1965, the role of profits increased significantly. Reflecting this, total profits increased rapidly, from 37 billion rubles in 1965 to 87 billion rubles in 1970. Profits, however, are distributed quite unevenly among sectors, and the profit rate on fixed and working capital varies enor- mously (table 7). For this reason, profits do not appear to be a reliable indicator of the contribution of capital to production, a precondition for the use of established prices as a measure of production potential. Moreover, much of the service sector does not earn profits because the enterprises are financed from the state budget. The lack of any charge for the use of capital stock in the service sphere undervalues the resources used to produce those services. 36 Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.