Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
expenditure weights. Despite reservations concerning
both the sub-indexes and weights, the composite index
probably reflects real outlays on recreation reasonably
well. Its relatively slow growth is consistent with the
traditional reluctance of the Soviet government to
invest in the provision of recreational facilities and
with the impact of rapidly growing availability of
television on attendance at movies and similar
activities.
Weights. The derivation of the 1970 expenditure
weights for the three sub-indexes is explained in CIA,
GNP 1970, p. 42.
Indexes. Entertainment. The index is based on the
sum of the numbers of paid admissions to movies and
admissions to theaters. These are the only series of
data on entertainment that are regularly published.
The data are to be found in two tables regularly
published in annual handbooks, e.g., Narkhoz 1972,
p. 669.
Vacation resorts. The index is based on the number of
persons staying at “sanatoria, resort polyclinics, rest
homes and pensions" in each year; the series excludes
visitors to “rest bases" and “tourist bases,” which are
essentially campgrounds and shelters. There are no
other data available to reflect such forms of recrea-
~tion. Data for 1950, l958, 1960-80 are given in tables
regularly published in Narkhozy, e.g. Narkhoz 1972,
p. 569. Growth rates for other years are interpolated.
Leisure. The index is based on manhour employment
in hotels. There are no other data available on this
form of travel and recreation, which is greatly under-
developed in the Soviet Union. Employment in hotels
was estimated for 1950-69 in Stephen Rapawy, Com-
parison of US and USSR Civilian Employment in
Government, I950-1969, US Bureau of the Census,
International Population Reports, P-95, No. 69, April
I972, p. 17. Estimates for subsequent years are based
on the assumption that employment in hotels in-
creased at the same rate as employment in the
housing—communal economy, regularly reported in
Narkhoz, e.g., Narkhoz I977, p. 378. The annual
number of manhours worked in hotels is assumed to
be the same as that in housing-communal economy.
Manhours for 1950-74 are estimated in Stephen
Rapawy, Estimates and Projections of Civilian Em-
ployment in the USSR, 1950-1990, US Bureau of the
Census, Foreign Economic Report No. 10, September
1976, p. 60, and extended to 1980 by him.
Communal Services
The index of communal services is a weighted aggre-
gate of separate indexes for education and for health.
The coverage of these services, nearly all state-pro-
vided, is virtually complete. The 1970 weights used to
combine the indexes are total current expenditures on
these services by the population and by the govern-
ment. The data underlying the two sub-indexes are
shown in Appendix F.
Education. Scope and Coverage. The definition of the
sector follows Soviet statistical practice and includes
(1) kindergartens and all types of general education
schools concerned with the education and rearing of
children, (2) trade schools (vocational-technical
schools), and (3) higher and secondary specialized
educational institutions of all kinds (Melodicheskiye
ukazaniya, I974, pp. 755-56). The coverage coincides,
mostly, with “private education and research,“ a
component of personal consumption expenditures in
the US national accounts, plus government expendi-
tures on education. Expenditures on nursery schools
and on public libraries in the US are included in
education; in the USSR, the former are included in
“health” and the latter in “culture.”
The index of education services is a weighted compos-
itc of two sub-indexes personnel services and other
current purchases, mainly food, utilities and supplies.
The index for personnel is a measure of manhour
employment and is used to move wage expenditures in
I970. The result is equivalent to the procedure used
by Bergson and Becker and also to that in the US.
where total wage expenditures are deflated by an
index of average wages. The index for other expendi-
tures is a deflated value series, as are similar indexes
constructed by Bergson for the USSR for I928-55
and by the Department of Commerce for the US.
Use of manhours as a measure of personnel services
makes no allowance either for productivity change or
fo:r improvement in the quality of education in general
that may have resulted from changing skill mixes and
an upgrading of the level of qualification of teaching
staffs. Because a suitable measure of productivity in
education has yet to be devised _and agreed upon, the
practice in the US and elsewhere is to measure
education services in real terms on the basis of inputs,
as is done here for the USSR. ln its measure, the US
does make some allowance for changes in the quality
of labor inputs (skill mixes). The data required for an
adjustment for rising qualifications and changes in
skill mixes are not available for the USSR.
349
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.