Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release:
Weights. The derivation of the 1970 weights for the
sub-indexes is shown in Table 8. Essentially, the task
was to disaggregate the components of the total
weight—retail sales for consumption, collective farm
market sales for consumption, military subsistence,
and consumption in kind. The distribution of retail
sales (the bulk of the total) could be made with
considerable confidence, using published retail sales
data and the assumption that the distribution of sales
to enterprises and institutions was the same in 1970 as
in 1968-69. Lack of data precluded allocation of the
public catering markup, amounting to 2.4 percent of
total retail sales of food and beverages. The distribu-
tions of CFM sales and military consumption are far
less certain, but probably not grossly wrong. The
distribution of consumption in kind is given by the
methodology for estimating its total value and is
thought to be reasonably accurate.
Indexes. The primary data underlying all of the sub-
indexes are given in Appendix B. Ten sub-indexes are
based on officially published data for per capita
consumption expressed in kilograms or units; these
data are converted to total consumption using mid-
year population data. These sub-indexes are: meat,
fish, vegetable oil, milk, eggs, sugar, flour and groats,
potatoes, vegetables, and fruit. Consumption so ob-
tained for milk was reduced by milk used to produce
cheese and butter: consumption of sugar was reduced
to remove sugar used to produce confectionery pro-
ducts: consumption of flour and groats was reduced to
remove flour used in the production of confectioneries
and macaroni. The basic data on per capita consump-
tion are given for 1950, 1958, 1960, and 1964-65 in
Narkhoz I965, p. 597; for 1966-67 in Narkhoz I967,
p. 697; for each year 1968-80 similar data are pub-
lished in the respective year’s Narkhoz in similar
tables. Data for the years 1951-57 and 1959 were
interpolated on the basis of growth rates for produc-
tion of each product over the intervening periods.
While the results for the period as a whole are
reasonably consistent with production data, the rates
of growth for 1951-55 and 1956-58 shown by the
physical consumption data are subject to considerable
and probably varying margins of error. Values for
1961-63 also were obtained by interpolation, by use of
production data, or with data on the value of con-
sumption in current rubles given in Narkhoz 1964,
pp. 580-81. The data required to remove the milk,
2019/07/19 C05210421
sugar, and flour used in making those products for
which separate sub-indexes are calculated are found
in various statistical handbooks and a variety of other
Soviet sources, as are the data used to calculate
indexes of quality change for confectionery products
and for flour and groats.
Six of the component indexes are based on production
in physical units: margarine, butter, cheese, confec-
tioneries, tea, and alcoholic beverages and soft drinks.
Where necessary and possible, the production data
were adjusted to allow for net imports and net
inventory change. The index for beverages is the sum
of production in dekaliters of 7 products, combined
with 1970 average price weights. Data on imports and
exports are regularly published in the annual trade
handbooks (Vneshnaya torgovlya SSS R). Data on
wholesale and retail inventories were regularly pub-
lished in two tables in the annual Narkhozy (e.g.
Narkhoz 1972, pp. 591, 593) until 1976; the tables
were dropped from the handbooks after 1975, thus
introducing some inaccuracies in the indexes for
subsequent years. The indexes for confectioneries and
flour and groats incorporate indexes ofquality to
reflect changes in product mix. The indexes for
tobacco and macaroni are based on deflated retail
sales, using official Soviet retail price indexes.
Soft Goods
Scope and Coverage. The “soft goods" category com-
prises (1) household purchases of 16 categories of
consumer nondurable goods that are explicitly listed
in Soviet retail trade data, plus an estimated share of
an unidentified residual in those data; (2) household
purchases of similar goods in collective farm mar-
kets-~a minor item; (3) military consumption of such
goods; and (4) consumption in kind of wool. Over four-
fifths of the weight for the category consists of
clothing and footwear and related items. Although the
index for soft goods is based on a sample, it covers 94
percent of the total estimated consumption of these
goods in 1970. The only items separately listed in
Soviet retail trade data that are not specifically
included are fur products and matches. A variety of
odds and ends that are included in residual (unidenti-
fied) retail sales are also excluded, however; the most
important of these are medicines and gasoline.
The index for soft goods is a weighted aggregate of 16
sub-indexes. All but 5 of the 16 pertain to clothing_
and footwear (including fabrics). The weights for the
sub-indexes were derived in a manner consistent with
the derivation of the weight for the category as a
339
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.