Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
allowance of 10 percent was made for processing and
distribution costs of state procured products, and the
average retail prices so estimated were then raised by
30 percent to bring them to the assumed “equilibri-
um” price. The final result is to reduce consumption
in kind by 5.6 billion rubles (12.7 compared with
18.3). Military subsistence is assumed to be correctly
valued in terms of the consumers utility standard,
since the original prices are a combination of retail
and CFM prices, more or less. The effects of the two
hypothetical adjustments to 1970 valuations cancel
out, leaving the value of the goods component of
consumption unchanged.
Relative prices for housing and some household ser-
vices in 1970 clearly did not correspond to the result
that would have obtained in an open market. Urban
housing was rationed and rents heavily‘ subsidized; the
basic rental rate was the same as in 1928. Prices for
utilities, public transport, communications and other
services also had remained fixed for many years.
Following Bergson’s approach, we revalue housing
and household services in 1970, so that their price is
related to that for goods in the ratio that prevailed in
the United States in 1976. We use the ruble/dollar
ratios given in the paper by Schroeder and Edwards."
The result is to more than treble the value of these
services, raising it from 21.6 billion rubles to 68.4
billion rubles. Education and health services, mainly
government provided and valued at current cost, are
re-valued at factor cost, thus increasing their level
from 23.0 billion rubles to 27.2 billion rubles.
The impact of all these revaluations is shown below:
A‘1.l“5E‘E‘1l’I'°_°5 ._--_
Percent Billion Percent
Rubles
Billion
Rubles
l?§!a.l’“S11°9lTFi°°$
Good? . . _
Household 21.6
S(?l'Y1C€S
7'8.9__m 166.5 63.5
10.2 68.4 26.1
Education & 23.0 10.9 27.2 10.4
health
Total 211.1 ""*T06.i1 "*76&.o"**i0B.0 T
When the indexes are reweighted with adjusted price
weights, the average annual growth of consumption
during 1951-80 is 5.2 percent instead of 4.9 percent.
The index is speeded up a little because of the much
2'
Gertrude E. Schroeder and Imogene Edwards, op. cit., p. 73.
larger weights given to the most rapidly expanding
categories—household services, most notably trans-
portation, communications and utilities. The structure
of Soviet consumption in adjusted prices more closely
resembles that of developed market economies, such as
Italy, than does the structure in established prices; in
those prices, the ratio of goods to all services resembles
that of India. It could be argued that in 1970 excess de-
mand for housing was relatively much greater than
that for household services; indeed, excess demand for
such services as public transportation, communications
and utilities was not especially evident (i.e., by queues
and waiting lists). To consider the effect of this
possibility, the above calculation was carried out with a
revaluation only for housing among the household
services. The result was to slow the index of total
consumption somewhat—from an average annual
growth of 4.9 percent to 4.5 percent during 1951-80.
Comparison With Other Indexes
Official Soviet Measures
As already noted, the Soviet government does not
publish an index of real per capita consumption that
can properly be compared with measures available for
Western countries. For a number of years before
1976, the government published periodic data on total
“personal consumption” and “material expenditures
of institutions serving the population” in current
rubles. The only published deflator related to final
consumption is an index of retail prices in state and
cooperative outlets. The index which shows almost no
change in the price level since 1955, has been judged
seriously unreliable.“ Indexes of collective farm mar-
ket prices in the USSR as a whole have not been
published since 1968, although an aggregate index
can be calculated indirectly from regularly published
data.
The Soviet consumption data refer to consumption as
a component of national income (net material prod-
uct), omitting labor in all services but including some
depreciation on housing and on the capital stock in the
services sector. For 1961-1975, the only period for
which a comparable series in available, the Soviet
measure of total consumption per capita deflated by
“ See articles by Gertrude E. Schroeder and Morris Bornstein in
Treml and Hardt, pp. 307-312, 370-376.
333
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.