Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
are based on deflated retail sales or value of produc-
tion in “constant” prices may impart an upward bias
to the index, because of the dubious reliability of the
official price indexes used as deflators. These two
sources of bias tend to offset each other. Judging from
a mass of anecdotal evidence from the Soviet press
concerning the poor quality of consumer goods and
hidden price inflation, however, one might conclude
that the upward biases are predominant. There is no
good way to assess the matter.
Category Weights
The expenditure weights used to aggregate the 1 l
major categories of goods and services are those for
1970 estimated in the calculations of GNP by end use
in established prices. A full description of the sources
and methods of their derivation is given in CIA, GNP
I970. The weights shown there have been revised
considerably to take into account additional or more
recent information and an improved understanding of
Soviet data; the revisions are described in Appendix D
of JEC, GNP, 1950-80. The revisions reduced total
consumption by 4 percent and raised the share of
goods as opposed to services. A summary description
of the revised weights follows:
\
Goods. The weights for food and soft goods are the
sum of (1) retail sales reduced to reflect only house-
hold purchases for consumption, (2) consumption in
kind estimated in physical units valued at average
prices realized by producers (“farm gate” prices) and
(3) military subsistence estimated by valuing rations
in 1970 prices. The weight for durables and miscella-
neous goods represents retail sales reduced to reflect
only household purchases for consumption.
Household services. The weights represent estimated
household expenditures on these services based on a
wide variety of Soviet sources, mainly studies by
individual researchers published in books and journal
articles.
Communal services. The weights are the sums of
estimated expenditures for education and health (1) by
households based on a variety of Soviet and other
sources and (2) by the government, derived from
official data on wages and employment and on budget
expenditures for other items, net of investment outlays
and stipends. -
On the whole, the expenditure weights are considered
to be quite reliable. Although nominal consumption
may be overstated because of inability to remove some
non-consumption expenditures from retail sales of
goods and services, the total can be reconciled fairly
well with official Soviet values for consumption. The
total, of course, does not take into account black
market prices and other activities carried on in the
illegal “second” economy. Such activities are not
included in GNP in other countries either. In the
Soviet case, moreover, they probably generate mainly
price increases and income transfers rather than
additions to the supply of real goods and services." As
for individual category weights, which are based on
specific Soviet sources and assumptions, their magni-
tudes generally are supported by other information
that is available. Also, the revealed expenditure pat-
tern agrees well with that given by official statistics
based on family budget surveys (Narkhoz I977, pp.
409-410), and, in general, with what one would expect
on the basis of international comparisons for a coun-
try at the USSR’s level of development as measured
by per capita GNP and consumption.“ Data from
surveys of the family budgets of urban Jewish emi-
grees also support the relationshipsfwhen allowance is
made for the unrepresentative composition of the
sample."
The 1970 weights used to aggregate the component
indexes, both for major categories and for their sub-
categories, are probably about as accurate as can be
obtained with the data base and understanding of its
meaning that are available at present. Although a
number of estimates and assumptions had to be made
in the process of constructing these weights, the
impact of any errors cannot be large. If anything, the
values for consumption as a whole and for some
categories" are probably overstated, a tentative conclu-
sion stemming from the fact that successive revisions
in the weights, based on new information invariably
produced lower values. The data underlying the
weights for individual sub-categories are of uneven
quality, a matter that will be considered in the
following section.
" Many personal services are provided privately, both legally and
illegally. The expenditure weights for repair and personal care and
health and education services include a substantial allowance for
such services, based on a variety of information.
“ Data on comparative expenditure patterns are given in Schroeder
and Edwards, 0p. cit.; International Labour Office, Household
Income and Expenditure Statistics, N0. 3, I968-I976, Geneva,
1979; V. Cao-Pinna and S. S. Shatalin, Comparison Patterns in
Eastern and Western Europe. New York, Pergamon Press, 1979.
" Gur Ofer and Aaron Vinokur, Private Sources of Income ofthe
Soviet Urban Household, RAND, R-2359-NA, August I980, pp.
53-69. -
330
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.