“Gross”60+ pages
- p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national
product and its components…
- p. 5 …quantified estimates of
the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
- p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based
on gross output rather than value…
- p. 7 …For
example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of
agricultural…
- p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used
by agriculture (seed and…
- p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet
eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
- p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x
I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
- p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80
By…
- p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972
6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
- p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421
Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39
by…
- p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture
B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
- p. 17 …I
Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use,
I if
I970
D-6.
I…
- p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981
Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982
Soviet Economic…
- p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421
Gross National Product
of the USSR, 1950-80
Introduction
This paper presents…
- p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices,
1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
- p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet
Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for
selected OECD countries.” For…
- p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross
National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128.
difference between the growth…
- p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis.
The enterprise is expected to be managed…
- p. 41 …the business sector
and are included in gross private business investment.
The second US account shows…
- p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax
amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
- p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross
outputs of the sugar and other…
- p. 45 …The capital stock data used
in this study are gross of depreciation.
Approved for Release: 2019…
- p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421
Table 8 Billion Rubles
Gross National Product of the Soviet Union '
in…
- p. 48 …The row and column sums are
determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec-
tively…
- p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421
Table 10 Percent
1970 Soviet Gross National Product
by End Use
W…
- p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed
as a residual—the difference between gross output
and current material…
- p. 53 …Therefore, if in-
dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the
gross output…
- p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures
the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the
physical…
- p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable
than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
- p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421
Appendix A '
Soviet Gross National
Product, 1950-80
This appendix presents the…
- p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6
Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
- p. 60 …4
._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5
1.0
Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
- p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
- p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___
Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
- p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0
Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
- p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“
'
Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
- p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4
Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
- p. 66 …9
0.3
2.5
0.3
Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
- p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
- p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
- p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _
Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
- p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1
Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
- p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_;
Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
- p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘
Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
- p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1
Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
- p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
- p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
- p. 78 …g
4.3
0.0 0.0
Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
- p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2
Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
- p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W
Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
- p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8
Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
- p. 82 …3.2
7*
1.4 1.3
Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
- p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5
Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
- p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3
7
17717
Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
- p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9
Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
- p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g
Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
- p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1
Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
- p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8
Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
- p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur-
chases from the deflated gross output produces value
added in constant…
- p. 90 …The
ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to
gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
Table C-7 11/1111161116118
USSR: Potatoes Used for Feed (Crop Year)
Year Available by Officially
Calculation 3 Reported '1
Series in
the Index ¢
Table C-8 Thousand tons
USSR: Derivation of Quantities of Vegetables
Available for Feed
Year Production 3 Imports b Consumption C Available
for Feed *1 W
1950
1951_7
33.0
10.2
23.0
20.2
1950 9,344 47.9 9,185.1 206.8
1951 8,836 NA NA NA
1952 21.1 21.1 1952 9,774 NA NA NA
1953 24.1 24.1 1953 11,389 NA NA NA
1954 26.4 26.4 1954 11,918 NA NA NA
1955
1956
1957
23.0
45.0
36.1
23.0
30.0
36.1
1955 14,100 74.2 13,537.23 ‘636.4_
7
1956 14,298 56.4 l2,980.5 1,373.9
1957 14,766 125.2 13411.2 1,480.0
*7
1958 34.1 34.1 1958 14,865 151.1 14,682.8 _3_33.3
7
1959 35.6 35.6 1959 14,774 225.9 14,103.5 896.4
1960 34.6 38.0 38.0 1960 16,574 240.9 15,001 .0 1,813.9
1_961 34.5 39.3 39.3 1961 16,151 340.2 14,61§._5_ 1,§7_2.7
1962 19.9 36.9 36.9 1962 15,989 350.1 14,s5L_g_ 1,4313. 1_
1963 21.3 32.6 32.6 1963 15,051 418.3 14,214.9 1,254.4
1964 41.3 29.6 29.6 1964 19,467 565.1 16,879.4 :T;1“5i2.7
1965 36.8 36.1 36.1 R65 17,627 432.5 16,624.8 1,_4_34.7
L996 37.9 41.5 41.5
1967_ 45.4 38.8 38.8
1966 17,857 521.2 l7,045.5 1,332.7
1967 20,534 584.5 18,880.0 2,23s;_5
1968 51.7 39.4 39.4 1968 19,011 551.9 18,825.7 737.2
1969 41.5 37.6 37.6
1970 47.1 36.9 36.9
1969 18,745 564.1 18,285.6 1,023.5
8
1970 21,212 612.0 l9,909.6 1,914.4
1971 ___43.7 43 1971 20,840 850.4 20,833.5 03533
1972 29.4 30
1973 59.0
26.1
45
26
1972 19,941 965.8 19,8000 1,106.8
L973 25,927 840.8 21,224.5 343.3
1974 24,81 1 865.8 2l,932.7 3,744.11974
35.3 35 1975 23,351 708.8 22,650.5 1,409.31975
37.4 37 1976 24,991 816.3 22,084.8 3,722.5
A
1976
35.9 36 1977 24,149 888.4 22,792.0 2,24551977
38.3 38 1978 23,902 889.9 24,039.6 752.31978
1979 42.8 42 1979 27,215 891.3 25,023.0 3,083.3
B Based on data in table C-6, calculated as explained in text above
1’ USDA, ERS Foreign 355, Livestock Feed Balancesfor the USSR,
(undated), p. 20, converted to crop year use assuming 2/3 of quantity
fed this year is from last year’s crop and 1 / 3 is from this year’s. The
data are not available for 1950-59 or for 1971-79.
C With the exception of 1950-51, which are arbitrarily smoothed, and
1956, which is arbitrarily reduced in order to be more consistent with
the given data, the residually-derived data for 1950-59 are accepted.
Similarly, with the exception of 1973, which is reduced, the
residually-derived data for 1971-79 are accepted.
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
8 Appendix table A-2.
1’ Appendix table C-9.
C Midyear population times officially reported per capita consump-
tion from Narkhoz I979, p. 432, and earlier editions.
4 Production plus imports less human consumption. Theoretically,
imports and consumption of vegetables should be lagged to balance
with crop year production in order to derive a quantity of vegetables
available for feed. To lag imports and consumption, we arbitrarily
assumed each occurs evenly throughout the year. Quantities
imported and quantities consumed in year t and year t+ 1 were
averaged. Although the resulting quantities available for feed were
somewhat different from those shown above, the difference is so
small in value terms that growth in the index of net value of output
was changed by less than 0.1 percent in any year. Because the effect
is so small, we did not lag imports and consumption.
312