Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
Table 11
Comparison of CIA and FAO Indexes of Soviet
Agricultural Production, 1966-79 8
FAO
1969-71
Prices
CIA
1970
Prices
CIA Less
Livestock
Inventory Change
1970 Prices
1966 91.2 86.6 89.2
1967 93.1 86.6 92.6
1968 97.1 91.7 97.7
1 969 92.2 89.0 92.9
1970 100.0 100.0 100.0
1971 102.0 99.6 102.1
1972 97.1 94.0 99.3
1973 113.7 107.8 111.3
1974 108.8 106.5 111.0
1975 106.9 98.2 106.2
1976 111.8 106.1 110.9
1977 113.7 111.0 113.6
1978 122.5 114.6 119.0
1979 115.7 107.-9 113.0
Average annual
rates of growth
(percent)
1967-70 2.3 3.7 2.9
1971-76 1.9 1.0 1.7
1967-79 1.8 1.7 1.8
Average absolute
percentage
difference
.044 .012
'1 1970=l00
deduction is applied to the value of livestock output to
account for use of domestic and imported feed. The
feed share is estimated according to the relationship
between the value of feeds (excluding forage) and the
value of livestock products in 1969-71.“‘ No deduc-
tions are made for seed use; grain and sunflower seed
are not reduced by a waste allowance.
"‘ The USDA 38~percent share is higher than the share of crop-
sector feed in livestock output as shown in the 1972 input-output
table in current prices. Even when purchases by animal husbandry
from the food industry are added, the share of feed in livestock
output is still under 30 percent. Crop-sector feed as a share of
livestock output in the CIA index is about 20 percent in the 1969-
71 period; it includes only feeds counted elsewhere in the index. In
subtracting 38 percent of livestock output for feed, the USDA
appears to be deducting more feed than is counted in the output
index.
Sample coverage in the USDA index resembles that
of the CIA index with some minor exceptions. The
USDA index includes only sunflower seed in,oilcrop
production. In livestock production, the USDA index
omits production of honey, silk cocoons, other meat,
and livestock inventory change.
Table 12 compares growth in the CIA and USDA
indexes for the years 1950-79. For the period as a
whole and for 11971-79 the USDA index shows faster
growth in all categories. The USDA crop index places
more weight on output of fruits and vegetables than
on grain and potatoes. During 1951-79 fruit and
vegetable production grew at an average annual rate
of 5.1 percent while grain and potatoes grew by only
1.4 percent. The CIA crop index weights output of
grain and potatoes more heavily than fruits and
vegetables and therefore grows more slowly. The
average absolute percentage difference for crops is
only two percent, however, while the difference for
livestock is almost 7 percent.
To assess the effect of the differing methodologies, a
variant of the CIA index was constructed using gross
crop production, eliminating livestock inventory
change, and applying a 38-percent feed allowance to
the value of livestock output‘. This procedure reduced
the difference for livestock significantly, but the
difference for the crop series increased. By eliminat-
ing grain discounts and seed deductions to create a
variant of the CIA crop index definitionally com-
parable to that of USDA, we increased the weight of
grain and potatoes. The effect of this change was to
widen the gap in growth between the two crop
indexes.
Table 13 compares the indexes in terms of crop and
livestock shares of net agricultural output. Since 1960
the USDA index shows livestock as representing only
about one third of total agricultural output whereas in
the CIA index livestock has accounted for more than
half of the total value of output since 1960. The CIA
index constructed with USDA methodology increases
the relative share of crops but this share is still below
that in the USDA index.
282
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.