Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
sector which produces substantial quantities of vege-
tables and may well feed some of the surplus. Vegeta-
bles, however, are a small component of feed; error
here does not have a significant impact on the overall
index movement.”
Whole milk fed to livestock can be estimated with a
greater degree of confidence. Data for’ whole milk fed
on state and collective farms were published for a
number of years. An occasional source has noted how
much whole milk is fed by the private sector, usually
in percentage terms. Finally, two sources have pro-
vided benchmark data on total quantities of whole
milk fed.” Although estimates of whole milk fed can
be made with acceptable confidence, the problem of
accounting for skim milk fed remains. Roughly 60
percent of total milk production is purchased by the
state; about one-half of that is used for manufacture
of butter. While some of the resulting fluid skim milk
is dried, much of it is returned to farms for use as
feed.“ In a sense, this can be considered intrasector
use since the chief criterion determining prices paid to
farms for milk is butterfat content, not fluid quanti-
ties, and the prices paid by farms for the returned
skim milk are negligible.” At any rate, we do not
include an estimate of skim milk fed, although an
average of 27.5 million tons of skim milk were
reported fed during 1961-70.“ Any resulting bias is
small; an arbitrary calculation incorporating an esti-
mate of skim milk fed had almost no effect on the
total estimated value of feed fed.
Hatching eggs. In addition to estimating feed used in
the production of livestock output, we also deduct for
hatching eggs. These eggs, which amount to about 5
percent of all eggs produced, are required for hatching
to produce poultry for meat and to increase poultry
flocks. Few official Soviet data are available on the
” To test the sensitivity of the index, the quantities of estimated
vegetables fed were arbitrarily doubled. The change in value of all
feed fed was negligible.
" See Appendix Table C-10.
" State farms, collective farms, and other state agricultural enter-
prises, selling milk to the state, have the right to receive skim milk
according to norms set by the Councils of Ministers of the union
republics. These norms differ according to republic and to type of
farm. A.F. Bochalin and G.M. Rogozin, Spravochnik pa zakupkam
produktov zhivotnovodstva, Moscow, 1974, pp. 179-183.
” Farms are charged 10 rubles per ton. Ibid., p. 179.
°‘ USDA, ERS Foreign 355, Feed Balances for the USSR,
(undated), p. 20.
number of eggs used for hatching. The most recent
Soviet statement, however, is consistent with our
estimates.” Our estimate is based on the increase in
poultry flocks from year to year and the relationship
between poultry meat output and the number of birds
necessary to produce that quantity of meat. An
allowance is made for mortality in young chicks and
for eggs that fail to hatch. Hatching and mortality
rates can be estimated from Soviet sources.” Al-
though the level of losses from both sources is higher
than in the United States,” we assume it is reasonable
since the literature contains frequent references to
problems in poultry management.‘°° Hatching eggs
are a relatively minor item in the index and errors
here are not significant. No attempt is made to
construct an egg balance to test the validity of the
estimates.
C. Testing the Estimates of Seed and Feed
We tested our estimates of seed and feed against the
Soviet input-output tables for 1966 and 1972. We
compared the shares of gross output going to seed and
feed use in our index with the shares shown by the
input-output tables.“" Because the Soviet tables meas-
ure gross output and value commodities produced and
used within the sector at cost ‘°’ some adjustments had
to be made to our index to achieve comparability. For
the years 1966 and 1972, we valued all seed and feed
produced in the crop sector at cost.“" Values at cost
are included in output and in totals for feed use. We
converted the CIA index of net crop production to a
” In May 1979, an official of the Ministry of Procurement stated
that the number of eggs used for incubation amounts to about 3
billion eggs for the USSR as a whole (ZhurnaIist, no. 5, 1979, pp.
41-43). Our estimate for 1978 is 3.2 billion.
" See I.N. Zamyslov, Ekonomicheskaya otsenka otrasley zhiv0tno-
yodstva, Moscow, 1973, p. 91; also, Spravochnik: promyshlennoye
ptitsevodstvo, Moscow, 1971, pp. 48-116.
” USDA, Agricultural Statistics 1978, Washington D.C., 1978, pp.
403, 414.
'°° See, for example, Finansy SSSR, no. 11, 1973, p. 28. -
'°' Data in the 1966 and 1972 input-output tables were converted to
1970 prices using indexes developed by Vladimir Treml. (See V.G.
Treml, ed., Studies in Soviet Input-Output Analysis, Praeger
Publishers, New York, 1972, pp. 218, 219, 272.)
"" Yu. E. Gaabe et al., Statistika seI'skogo khozyaystva, Moscow,
1971, p. 228.
‘°’ This calculation does not include milk used for feed or eggs for
hatching.
274
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.