Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
Table 6
lntrasector Use of Agricultural Output,
Annual Averages, Selected Years
1950-52 1959-61
Million 1970 rubles
1964-66 1969-71 1977-7_9____
Seed
Grain 2139.7 2478.2 2817.7 2624.4 2738.6
Potatoes 1818.7 1991.6 1841.4 _ 1803.1 1525.8
Total 3958.4 4469.7 4659. l 4428.1 4264.4
Seed as a share of gross crop output 17.0 13.7 12.1 10.1 5-L”
Feed and hatching eggs
Grain 1298.8 3400.0 3852.2 _ 6011.6 9308.6 i
Potatoes 1350.3 2370.9 2251.2 2467.5 we-1>_
Vegetables 25.3 145.7 186.8 ,
117.2 193.2
Milk 908.1 1574.5 1679.1 2221.3 we-2._
Total feed 3582.6 7491.1 7969.3 _ 10377.6 14172.2
_
Hatching eggs 35.3 108.7 94.2 175.0 324.4
Total intrasector use 3617.9 7599.8 8063.5 11052.6 14496.6
lntrasector use as a share 16.8
of gross livestock output
18.8 18.2 20.3 22.2
Shortcomings of the seed estimates center on the 4
seeding rates. We use a constant seeding rate for the
entire 1950-79 period whereas the actual rate prob-
ably has changed over time. Evidence indicates, fur-
thermore, that our seeding rates may be too low. One
Soviet source claims that 20 centners per hectare of
potatoes were seeded during 1962-65 and 25 centners
during 1967-69." We estimate potato seeding at '19
centners per hectare for all years. In the case of grain,‘
a Soviet writer claims that seed use averaged 30.8
million tons per year during 1971-75." Our estimates
show average seed use of 26 million tons during the
period. The grain calculations may understate actual
use because the norms refer to ‘first-class’ seed, which
exceeds the quality of much seed grain.” As of 1
January 1979, for example, only 71 percent of seed
" Zakupki selkkokhozyaystvennykh produktov, no. 3, 1973, p. 18.
" Plan khoz, no. 3, 1979, p. 38. See also, Pravda Ukrainy, 15 July
1979, p. 2, which argues that farms incorrectly increase the norms
for seeding, and notes that increasing the norm does not make up
for poor soil preparation, poor use of fertilizer, and so on. Zakupki
sel'sk0zyaystvennykh produktov, no. 1, 1978, p. 6, implies that
during 1971-75, farms sowed from 22 to 37 million tons annually.
” First-class seed is seed with no more than 1 percent (by weight)
content of broken kernels and admixtures and with viability not less
than 95 percent.
for spring grain and pulse crops met standards for
first or second class seed.“ Presumably, the lower the
seed quality the more seed is required for a given area.
B. Estimates of Livestock Feed and Hatching Eggs
We estimate quantities of grain, potatoes, vegetables,
and whole milk fed to livestock. We do not estimate
quantities of skim milk fed for reasons discussed
below. Finally, although some fruit is fed to livestock
in the USSR—largely because of marketing prob-
lems~—we make no estimates of the quantities because
of data limitations.”
Estimating feed fed to livestock poses many more
problems than deriving estimates of seed use. The
CIA index includes the value of feed produced and
used within agriculture such as hay, corn for silage,
feed roots, and pasture feed in the value of livestock
output. Although it would be more correct to add
their value to crop production and deduct it from
" Ibid.
Q ~
” Statements are limited to “farms every year are forced to send
millions of tons of fruit for feed" (Trud, 8 August 1967, p. 2); “as is
known, the larger the fruit harvest, the bigger the share fed to
cattle" (Plan khoz, no. 8, 1968, p. 59); and “a goodly share of fruit
is fed to livestock" (Literalurnaya gazeta, no. I , I973, p. I 0).
271
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.