Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 115 …science and administration in 1970 published by V. M. Rutgayzer, Resursy razvi- tiya neproizvodstvenno sfery, Moscow…
  • p. 116 …8 .000 37.2 Sources: Column 1: V. M. Rutgayzer, Resursy razvitiya neproiz- growth rates published…
  • p. 127 …as man-hour employment during 1960-72 (V. M. Rut- gayzer, Resursy razvitiya neproizvodstvennoy sfery, pp…
  • p. 304 …N©_ N§%@_ Wo§§_ _@@@_ OOOVN NO©w_ O®%©_ §V©m_ U “NUS; “BE; NOHN C30m __80'F…
  • p. 305 …N CQM _@m@ §X@_ m%QN Qm®V m%§N @§©N §@mN W SM 32 ~2hM…
  • p. 339 …0 Scfhool thread V f 3.6’ V M g V r A W .010 i10ffiC6Sl5…
  • p. 351 …gs Q9% N? G2“ Q2 QNM _v_M fig 5 OUQNLOF 52“ Q8 gm A Q…
  • p. 367 …as ‘Q1 A28 E_flm=OF:V m__8§_U:__m Q3“ gs Q: W: QM…
  • p. 368 …O___E_ Ea 28> ‘ _NN ‘_NN _mN _v_ _: _m_ _m_ _N_ _: _$ _:_ ‘ ‘S do do AG a…
  • p. 371 …wag g_§ Q? Bony“ 5 is__o____EV__°€E_m__°&U__|v__m_M_ Maw £5…
  • p. 372 …Am__2=8_U“ CBEEV :o§_E__28‘0E3 v__ v__ M; N__ N; ___ Q; H…
  • p. 377 …fig =~_o__|8_€uH _83 W8; 4:; .;v__ _M§__ 62; _:_m__ _§___ $2: 6%; _n:___ A83____ 22…
  • p. 378 …m _§ A832 22 __°==EV “Ba ___§__ 8__eU__v|%°m _u_O__3:°= :2 ©_8_ 502 ©_8…
  • p. 380 …m __2°__|h_N8 Eosuga: _ovqN N _v“m& ~fiJmMMm: A“m€N 62: _§&__ _$M: _§__ _og…
  • p. 385 …656 {£6 :3 2? £3 22 _°g_Q _N°__v _;M: $2 €__g___o_3 2…
  • p. 386 …sgg __2___EV B__UEuE3_ v__ M: _d QN 06 66 on V6 M:_ :‘v_u8m…
  • p. 387 …A__o__=EV £8 3__§£v M__o_|U__o€U_QP v_ :_o_CN m…
  • p. 391 …8__o__Qm_3 _~__J__|2_amaU_U'__ Am_H_MW__O_ym__‘_a__“_“v_“§m…
  • p. 392 …56: __NQ A35_____ =°____EV Eu_E8>___ Mo Hg E530 m__8__wM_D_u___v_ _ m…
  • p. 393 …9% :02 o_£N__ c_8N>_ v_\_m@__ ‘ 28 5% QQMW _o:__N _NmN_N 2…
  • p. 394 …NS; Q02 Q02 W go A335 __2_=____V m_€_=_° _=__U___:__O 55° {Q Q? :_m Q…
  • p. 396 …WQMNH fig 28 Q2“ ©_g_ fiN2 A832 _§__E_V m_€_§° _=__O____=o :50 °_h:___ ix: :02…
  • p. 397 …H:__ :2; Mw_§__ Q8” T63 E3: __°____EV £v__&__m w Qgqww go; o_:\_§ Q:m§ 3…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
increased slightly since 1965. Total defense expendi-
tures are not presented as a separate end-use category
because we believe that some defense expenditures are
contained in several other components of GNP. In-
vestment probably includes the procurement of com-
mon use durables, such as trucks and transport air-
craft, and the construction of military facilities.
Science probably is very heavily weighted toward
defense expenditures. Other defense expenditures
could well be contained in administration, education,
and health expenditures. Because of many uncertain-
ties, no estimate is made here of the values of defense
expenditures included in the other end-use categories.
Estimates of total defense expenditures have been
made by the CIA independent of the GNP accounts.
These data are presented for reference in appendix C.
Consumption has declined as a share of GNP from 60
percent in 1950 to 54 percent in 1980. Consumption
consists of two principal components, goods and serv-
ices, which have shown similar growth rates. The
consumption of goods has grown at an annual rate of
4.3 percent per year since 1950, and services at 4.2
percent compared with 4.7 percent for GNP. As a
result, the consumer goods share of GNP has declined
from 38 percent in 1950 to 34 percent in 1980, while
the consumer services share has declined from 22 to
20 percent. Within consumption, there have been
sizable structural changes. The consumption of food
has declined sharply as a share of GNP, from 32
percent in 1950 to 23 percent in 1980, while the
consumption of soft goods and durables has risen as a
share of GNP from 6 percent in 1950 to 11 percent in
1980.
Trends in per capita consumption are more useful
indicators of the impact on living standards of re-
sources allocated to consumption than are trends in
total consumption. Measured at factor cost, Soviet per
capita consumption has grown at an average annual
rate of 2.9 percent since 1950, but only 2.2 percent
since 1970——reflecting both the overall slowdown in
GNP growth and the falling share of consumption in
GNP.
Soviet Growth in International Perspective
Without doubt the Soviet economy has achieved rapid
growth since 1950. This performance, however, can
best be interpreted and understood when compared
19
with growth trends in other countries during the same
period. These trends can be measured in terms of
GNP growth, priorities in output use, and growth in
per capita consumption.
Comparisons of GNP Growth. Table 1 compares the
average annual rates of growth of GNP for the Soviet
Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for
selected OECD countries.” For the entire 1951-79
period, the figure for the Soviet Union is roughly in
the middle of the OECD range. Japan, West Germa-
ny, Spain, and Turkey clearly achieved faster growth
than the Soviet Union, and several other nations
achieved rates close to the Soviet figure. In compari-
son with the United States, the Soviet Union consis-
tently enjoyed a higher growth rate until the late
1970s. The average annual growth rate of Soviet
GNP is a full percentage point higher than that of the
United States for the entire 1951-79 period. Since
1970, however, the growth rate of Soviet GNP has
declined steadily, while the US growth rate has
continued at roughly an unchanged tempo. As a
result, the US and Soviet economies grew by almost
the same average rates in the 1970s.
Priorities in Output Use. Another way of comparing
the performance of the Soviet and OECD economies
is to examine the patterns of output use. Table 2
shows the percentage distribution of the GDP of
several OECD countries and of the GNP of the Soviet
Union among consumption, investment, and all other
expenditures. The data for the Soviet Union are not
strictly comparable with those for the OECD coun-
tries because Soviet Government expenditures for
health, education, and physical culture are included in
consumption. These expenditures were equal to 5.5
percent of Soviet GNP in 1970 and serve to inflate
Soviet consumption data relative to the OECD data.“
The share of Soviet GNP allocated to investment,
measured in 1970 prices, has steadily increased—
from 14 percent in 1950 to 32 percent in l979—while
” The difference between GNP and GDP for the Soviet Union is
negligible and can be ignored for these comparisons.
1‘ JEC, Consumption Comparison, makes careful adjustments for
these definitional differences and obtains similar changes in the
consumption shares to those shown in table 2. The absolute levels of
the adjusted consumption shares, as expected, are higher.
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.