Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
increased slightly since 1965. Total defense expendi-
tures are not presented as a separate end-use category
because we believe that some defense expenditures are
contained in several other components of GNP. In-
vestment probably includes the procurement of com-
mon use durables, such as trucks and transport air-
craft, and the construction of military facilities.
Science probably is very heavily weighted toward
defense expenditures. Other defense expenditures
could well be contained in administration, education,
and health expenditures. Because of many uncertain-
ties, no estimate is made here of the values of defense
expenditures included in the other end-use categories.
Estimates of total defense expenditures have been
made by the CIA independent of the GNP accounts.
These data are presented for reference in appendix C.
Consumption has declined as a share of GNP from 60
percent in 1950 to 54 percent in 1980. Consumption
consists of two principal components, goods and serv-
ices, which have shown similar growth rates. The
consumption of goods has grown at an annual rate of
4.3 percent per year since 1950, and services at 4.2
percent compared with 4.7 percent for GNP. As a
result, the consumer goods share of GNP has declined
from 38 percent in 1950 to 34 percent in 1980, while
the consumer services share has declined from 22 to
20 percent. Within consumption, there have been
sizable structural changes. The consumption of food
has declined sharply as a share of GNP, from 32
percent in 1950 to 23 percent in 1980, while the
consumption of soft goods and durables has risen as a
share of GNP from 6 percent in 1950 to 11 percent in
1980.
Trends in per capita consumption are more useful
indicators of the impact on living standards of re-
sources allocated to consumption than are trends in
total consumption. Measured at factor cost, Soviet per
capita consumption has grown at an average annual
rate of 2.9 percent since 1950, but only 2.2 percent
since 1970——reflecting both the overall slowdown in
GNP growth and the falling share of consumption in
GNP.
Soviet Growth in International Perspective
Without doubt the Soviet economy has achieved rapid
growth since 1950. This performance, however, can
best be interpreted and understood when compared
19
with growth trends in other countries during the same
period. These trends can be measured in terms of
GNP growth, priorities in output use, and growth in
per capita consumption.
Comparisons of GNP Growth. Table 1 compares the
average annual rates of growth of GNP for the Soviet
Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for
selected OECD countries.” For the entire 1951-79
period, the figure for the Soviet Union is roughly in
the middle of the OECD range. Japan, West Germa-
ny, Spain, and Turkey clearly achieved faster growth
than the Soviet Union, and several other nations
achieved rates close to the Soviet figure. In compari-
son with the United States, the Soviet Union consis-
tently enjoyed a higher growth rate until the late
1970s. The average annual growth rate of Soviet
GNP is a full percentage point higher than that of the
United States for the entire 1951-79 period. Since
1970, however, the growth rate of Soviet GNP has
declined steadily, while the US growth rate has
continued at roughly an unchanged tempo. As a
result, the US and Soviet economies grew by almost
the same average rates in the 1970s.
Priorities in Output Use. Another way of comparing
the performance of the Soviet and OECD economies
is to examine the patterns of output use. Table 2
shows the percentage distribution of the GDP of
several OECD countries and of the GNP of the Soviet
Union among consumption, investment, and all other
expenditures. The data for the Soviet Union are not
strictly comparable with those for the OECD coun-
tries because Soviet Government expenditures for
health, education, and physical culture are included in
consumption. These expenditures were equal to 5.5
percent of Soviet GNP in 1970 and serve to inflate
Soviet consumption data relative to the OECD data.“
The share of Soviet GNP allocated to investment,
measured in 1970 prices, has steadily increased—
from 14 percent in 1950 to 32 percent in l979—while
” The difference between GNP and GDP for the Soviet Union is
negligible and can be ignored for these comparisons.
1‘ JEC, Consumption Comparison, makes careful adjustments for
these definitional differences and obtains similar changes in the
consumption shares to those shown in table 2. The absolute levels of
the adjusted consumption shares, as expected, are higher.
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.