Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 184 …Metalwares, metal structurals, light industry and processed food industry machinery and equipment, and mineral chemicals are…
  • p. 271 …meals, fish meal, and vitamin and mineral supplements as well as ground hay and other materials…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
period immediately preceding and during harvest.“
Wet harvesting conditions tend to raise moisture
content of harvested grain to levels above internation-
ally accepted standards. Excess moisture inflates
bunker weight output statistics and increases chances
of subsequent losses from spoilage. Although Soviet
postharvest cleaning and drying is intended to restore_
wet grain to full value, the wetter the harvesting
conditions, the more difficult this becomes. Mishan-
dled wet grain may be grossly damaged or entirely
‘s£>2>i1¢a‘ for one or more of its intended Buses. F0? the
fall-sown winter grains, the months are June and July,
and for spring grain, August and September. For each
year in the index, the periods are categorized by
degree of “wetness”: very dry, dry, normal, wet, and
very wet according to the average number of millime-
ters of rainfall received, as follows: °'
___~* _ _ Spring Wheat Winter Wheat f_
E1wit ?_ Over 45.8 Over 76.3
Wet 40.5 45.7 965.3 - 76.2
Emma... ._.__-__35-3 -.4°~4 53.8 - 65.2 _
Dry 29.6 - 35.2 __ 42.3 - 53.7
Very dry Below 29.5 Below 42.2
Each moisture category, in turn, is assigned a percent-
age grain discount; a discount of 11 percent is adopted
for years of normal precipitation.“ We arbitrarily
"° The theory that variation from average precipitation during
harvesting is the main determinant of moisture and foreign matter
in harvested grain was set forth in U.S. Department of Agriculture,
ERS, Methodology for Estimating Variations in Soviet Bunker
Weight Grain Crops, 1975, (unpublished). Although the grain
discount also includes extraneous matter and unripe and damaged
kernels, no systematic separate methodology has been devised to
measure them. Excess moisture is believed to be the largest and
most variable component of waste with the greatest impact on
trends in output. Amounts of damaged kernels also fluctuate
widely, but they probably have a smaller impact on trends.
"‘
Precipitation data are compiled by the US Air Force. Mean
monthly precipitation data by oblast for each two-month period are
weighted by the respective sown area ofispring and winter wheat. _
"2 The average discount of 11 percent was derived indirectly from a
rough calculation based on quality (feed unit or nutritive value) of
concentrates fed on state and collective farms. (See_A (ER) 75-68,
'pp. 13-15.) Because of the way the official series on concentrated
feed is constructed, much of the exaggeration in Soviet grain
production statistics resulting from excessive moisture, dirt, da-
maged kernels, weed seeds, and the like, (waste), appears in the data
on quantities of concentrates fed. Grain makes up roughly 85
‘percent of the total tonnage of concentrates fed (see ibid., p. 33).
Our hypothesis is based on the difference between a) the average
feed unit value of concentrates fed as derived from published Soviet
raise this figure to 13 percent for wet years and to 15
percent for very wet years. In the other direction, 11
percent is lowered to 9 percent for dry years and to 7
percent for very dry conditions. The discounts for
winter and spring grains are weighted together using
30 percent for winter grains and 70 percent for spring
grains. These weights reflect the approximate per-
centage of spring and winter grains in total output. °’
For 1950-59, weather related discounts must take into
account the fact that 1950-54 official output statistics
probably understate the actual crop. For 1950-54,
therefore, the weather-related discount is not ap-
plied.“ For 1955-59, the necessary monthly precipita-
tion data are not available. For this period, the 1960
weather-related discount is moved back using an
statistics (Selkhoz 1971, pp. 332-333) and b) an average feed unit
value derived from the quantities of grain by type available for feed
(from the grain balances) over the same years, 1961-70 pp. 25-29).
We assume the assortment of grain actually fed is the same as that
of estimated grain available for feed. When these tonnage flgures
are converted to feed units using standard Soviet norms (sec G. V.
Kulik, Spravochnik ekonomista kolkhoza i sovkhoza, Moscow,
1970, p. 538), the resulting average feed unit value is substantially
higher than the average derived from the published series. The ,
discrepancy~which we attribute to waste including higher mois-
ture~ranged from 12 percent to 21 percent over the 10-year period
for which the data were available. Because we assume the waste
level to be uniform for the entire crop on the supply side, the overall
discount rate must be smaller. In crop year 1967/68, for example,
the estimated waste in feed is 20 percent. The tonnage represents
about 8 percent of grain produced in that year. Quantities of waste
as shares of output ranged from 4.3 to 11.6 percent over the 10-year
period; the average was 8 percent which we adopted as an average
discount. To this we add a 3-percent allowance for losses in
transportation and handling (A (ER) 75-68, p. 18). Although in
theory subsequent losses of grain need not be applied for purposes
of estimating net output, they are included in order to be consistent
with our estimates of grain balances and grain fed.
°’ We recognize that equating these moisture categories with
specific waste levels implies a more precise and consistent relation-
ship between precipitation and grain waste than actually exists in
fact. To date, however, this is the most satisfactory, consistent
methodology developed to measure fluctuations in grain waste.
“ Despite the presumed understatement in offlcial Soviet grain
output statistics in those years, excess moisture and waste existed.
See, for example, the statement that waste, shrinkage in drying,
and postharvest losses amounted to 5.1 percent of 1953 gross grain
output in kolkhozes. (A.I. Gozulov, Statistika sel'skogo kh0-
zyaystva, Moscow, 1959, p. 450.) See also Nancy Nimitz, RM-
4l27-PR, Soviet Government Grain Procurements, Dispositions,
and Stocks, I940, 1945-63. Rand Corporation, November, 1964, p.
4. We omit the weather-related discount for these years in our
estimates of net grain output only to compensate for the understate-
ment in offlcial statistics. We do not imply that these losses did not
exist or that farm statistical reports did not contain bunker weight
output data.
268
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.